A major aspect of the debate over abortion
concerns the use of terminology. In keeping with
Just Facts'
Standards of Credibility, this research
uses language that is clear and
precise. Thus,
phrases such as "pro-life" and
"pro-choice" are replaced by words that
articulate specific positions.
Perhaps the largest point of contention
involving terminology is the label applied
to what or who is being aborted. Those
who
think abortion should be generally illegal
often use the terms "unborn child" and
"unborn baby." According to Webster's
College Dictionary and Black's Medical
Dictionary, the word "child" can apply prior
to birth,[1][2] but both of these sources
employ the word "baby" only from the point
of birth onwards.[3][4]
In contrast, those who think
abortion should be generally legal often use
the word "fetus," a clinical term derived
from a Latin word meaning "offspring" or
"newly delivered."[5]
As explained by Dorland's Illustrated
Medical Dictionary, afetus is
the unborn offspring in the postembryonic
period, after major structures have been
outlined, in humans from nine weeks after
fertilization until birth.[6]
Hence, when referring to humans, the words
"fetus" and "fetal" are applicable from nine
weeks after fertilization until birth.[7][8] Yet, numerous major news organizations
have misapplied these terms to both before
and after this period.[9][10][11][12][13][14]
Although journalism guidelines disparage
the use of medical jargon,[15][16][17]
journalists selectively employ it in their
coverage of this issue. For instance, despite
the widespread
usage of "fetus," journalists commonly employ
the term "mother" to refer to a pregnant
woman, and rarely, if ever, the more
specific and clinical term "gravida."[18][19] Conversely, when the topic is not
abortion, press outlets sometimes shun the
term "fetus" and use "baby" or "child" in
its place.[20][21][22]
In accord with the common journalism
standard to "never use a scientific word
or a jargon word if you can think of an
everyday English equivalent,"[23] the term
utilized by Just Facts to describe the
object of an abortion is "preborn human."
This conveys reality in everyday language
and is consistent with medical usage. For
example, the embryology textbook Before We
Are Born: Essentials of Embryology and Birth
Defects states:
The zygote and early embryo are living human
organisms.[24]
Likewise, another embryology textbook bears
the title Human Life Before Birth, and
phrases such as "human in utero" and "human
females ... in utero" appear in creditable
medical texts.[25][26][27]
Also, it would
be scientifically inconsistent to assert
that a child born at
24 weeks
after fertilization is a human while one in
the womb
at
32 weeks is not.
Note that unless otherwise stated, the word
"abortion" is used here in the sense of an
induced abortion; not a spontaneous one,
which is also called a miscarriage.[28]
* The average length of a full-term
pregnancy is 38 weeks. Obstetricians
normally use a figure of 40 weeks, but this
is actually the time between the first day
of the last menstrual period and childbirth.
On average, the first day of the last
menstrual period occurs 2 weeks before
fertilization.[29][30][31]
* Following are facts about human
development. They are organized according to
the number of weeks since fertilization.
Weeks after the first day of the last
menstrual period (LMP) are shown in
parentheses.
Fertilization (2 weeks after LMP):
Fertilization normally takes place within
one day of intercourse but can occur up to
six days later.[32][33] At fertilization,
the genetic composition of a preborn human
is formed.[34] This genetic information
determines gender, eye color, hair color,
facial features, and influences
characteristics such as intelligence and
personality.[35]
Genetically speaking, with the exception of
identical twins,[36][37] once a woman
conceives a preborn human, the odds against
her conceiving the same one again are
greater than 10600 to one.[38][39] (For
comparison, there are roughly 1080 atoms in
the known universe.[40])
3 Weeks after Fertilization (5 weeks after LMP):
The eyes and spinal cord are visible and the
developing brain has two lobes.[41][42]
4 Weeks after Fertilization (6 weeks after LMP):
The heart is beating and a circulatory
system is in place.[43] The portion of the
brain associated with consciousness (the
cerebrum) and internal organs such as the
lungs are beginning to develop and can be
identified.[44]
7 Weeks after Fertilization (9 weeks after LMP):
Muscles and nerves begin working together.
When the upper lip is tickled, the arms move
backwards.[45] The cerebrum has divided into
hemispheres.[46]
More than 90% of the body structures found
in a full-grown human are present. The
medical classification changes from an
embryo to a fetus. This dividing line was
chosen by embryologists because from this
point forward, most development involves
growth in existing body structures instead
of the formation of new ones.[48][49] The
preborn human moves body parts without any
outside stimulation.[50]
10 Weeks after Fertilization (12 weeks after LMP):
All parts of the brain and spinal cord are
formed. The heart pumps blood to every part
of the body.[51] The whole body is sensitive
to touch except for portions of the head.
The preborn human makes facial
expressions.[52]
11 Weeks after Fertilization (13 weeks after LMP):
18 Weeks after Fertilization (20 weeks after LMP):
The portion of the brain responsible for
functions such as reasoning and memory (the
cerebral cortex) has the same number of
nerve cells as a full-grown adult.[60][61]
Up through approximately this point in time,
according to the Supreme Court's rulings in
Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey,
a pregnant woman can abort at will. (More
details in the section on
Constitution and Law.)
24 Weeks after Fertilization (26 weeks after LMP):
The blink-startle reflex and taste buds are
functional. The preborn human will swallow
more amniotic fluid if a sweetener is added
to it.[66][67] The grip is strong enough to
hold onto an object that is moving up and
down.[68] If born and given specialized
care, the survival rate is more than
80%.[69]
28 Weeks after Fertilization (30 weeks after LMP):
If exposed to an 85 decibel noise while
sleeping (about as loud as a blender),
preborn humans exhibit the "motor behaviors
that accompany the crying state."[70][71]
Premature infants born at this time are more
sensitive to pain than infants who are born
at 38 weeks, and infants who are born at 38
weeks are more sensitive to pain than
infants at 3-12 months after birth.[72][73]
If born and given specialized care, the
survival rate is more than 95%.[74]
38 Weeks after Fertilization (40 weeks after LMP):
Average point in time when humans are born.
At birth, the medical classification changes
from a fetus to a neonate.[75][76]
At any point prior to birth, according to
the Supreme Court's rulings in Roe v. Wade,
Doe v. Bolton, and Planned Parenthood v.
Casey, a pregnant woman can abort to
preserve her "health." One example from
Roe
v. Wade of what may be considered harmful to
a mother's health is the work of caring for
a child. (More details in the section on
Constitution and
Law.)
* The Democratic Party platform states that
abortion should be generally legal, supports
the Supreme Court ruling in Roe v. Wade, and
supports the use of taxpayer funding to
perform abortions. The platform also states
that the Democratic Party
strongly supports a woman's decision to have
a child by ensuring access to and
availability of programs for pre- and
post-natal health care, parenting skills,
income support, and caring adoption
programs.[77]
* The Republican Party platform states that
abortion should be generally illegal and
supports a Constitutional Amendment that
would assure preborn humans the right to
life. It opposes "using public revenues to
promote or perform abortion" and states:
We all have a moral obligation to assist,
not to penalize, women struggling with the
challenges of an unplanned pregnancy.
Every effort should be made to work with
women considering abortion to enable and
empower them to choose life.[78]
* Since 1989, several Democrats including
Jim Oberstar of Minnesota have sponsored at
least 11 resolutions proposing a
Constitutional Amendment that would
guarantee preborn humans the right to life,
all of them containing an exception to
protect the life of the mother.[79]
* Since 1989, several Republicans including
Ann Emerson of Missouri have sponsored at
least 23 resolutions proposing a
Constitutional Amendment that would
guarantee preborn humans the right to life,
all of them containing an exception to
protect the life of the mother. Six of these
resolutions also include exceptions for
cases of rape and incest.[80]
* The National Right to Life Political
Action Committee has endorsed Mitt Romney
for President and stated that Barack Obama
has an "abysmal record on life."[81]
* The Political Action Committee of NARAL
Pro-Choice America (formerly the National
Abortion Rights Action League) has endorsed
Barack Obama for President and stated that
"a Mitt Romney victory in November would be
disastrous for women."[82]
* At a Democratic Candidates "Compassion
Forum" held in April 2008, Barack Obama was
asked, "Do you personally believe that life
begins at conception, and if not, when does
it begin?" Obama replied in part:
This is something that I have not come to a
firm resolution on. I think it's very hard
to know what that means, when life begins.
Is it when a cell separates? Is it when the
soul stirs? So I don't presume to know the
answer to that question. What I know, as
I've said before, is there is something
extraordinarily powerful about potential
life that has a moral weight to it that we
take into consideration when we're having
these debates.[83]
* Several months later in an interview,
Obama was asked, "At what point does a baby
get human rights?" He responded in part:
I think that whether you are looking at it
from a theological perspective or a
scientific perspective, answering that
question with specificity, you know, is
above my pay grade.[84]
* Barack Obama has voiced support for Roe v.
Wade and stated that this would be reflected
in his appointments to the Supreme
Court.[85][86][87] He has also stated that
he supports a ban on late term abortions
but only with an exception for the "health"
of the mother.[88]
* In a July 2008 interview, Obama was asked
to clarify his position on late-term
abortions, and he stated:
I think it's entirely appropriate for states
to restrict or even prohibit late-term
abortions as long as there is a strict,
well-defined exception for the health of the
mother. Now, I don't think that mental
distress qualifies as the health of the
mother. I think it has to be a serious
physical issue that arises in pregnancy,
where there are real, significant problems
to the mother carrying that child to
term.[89]
* A few days later, a reporter asked for
clarification of these remarks, and Obama
responded that late-term abortion bans must
have an exception for "serious clinical
mental health diseases," but this does not
mean that "if a woman just doesn't feel good
then that is an exception. That's never been
the case." He also stated:
It is not just a matter of feeling blue. I
don't think that's how pro-choice folks have
interpreted it. I don't think that's how the
courts have interpreted it and I think
that's important to emphasize and
understand.[90]
* The Roe v. Wade verdict provides several
examples of what may constitute a risk the
health of the mother. These include the
"stigma of unwed motherhood" and the
"distress" "associated with the unwanted
child." Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton, which
were issued by the Supreme Court on the same
day with the order that they "are to be read
together," mandate that abortion be legal up
until the point of birth if any one
physician willing to perform an abortion
says it is necessary to preserve a
mother's health.[91][92] (More details in
the section on
Constitution and
Law.)
* Speaking before a Planned Parenthood
national conference in July 2007, Obama
stated: "I put Roe at the center of my
lesson plan on reproductive freedom when I
taught Constitutional Law. On this
fundamental issue, I will not yield and
Planned Parenthood will not yield."[93][94]
When asked what he do to "ensure access to
abortion" and make certain his judicial
nominees are "true to the core tenets of
Roe
v. Wade," he stated:
Well, the first thing I'd do as President
is sign the Freedom of Choice Act. That's
the first thing that I'd do.[95]
* The Freedom of Choice Act was introduced
in the U.S. Senate in April 2007 by 13
Democrats including Barbara Boxer
(California), Frank Lautenberg (New Jersey)
and Max Baucus (Montana).[96] One month
later, Barack Obama signed on as a
cosponsor.[97] Its stated objective is to
"protect, consistent with Roe v. Wade, a
woman's freedom to choose to bear a child or
terminate a pregnancy...." It would
invalidate "every Federal, State, and local
statute, ordinance, regulation,
administrative order, decision, policy,
practice" that interferes with the
termination of any "pregnancy prior to
viability" and any pregnancy "after
viability where termination is necessary to
protect the life or health of the
woman."[98]
* On the same day this bill was introduced
in the Senate, a bill with the same name and
parallel verbiage was introduced in the
House of Representatives.[99] It gained 109
sponsors (108 Democrats and one Republican)
but was not voted upon.[100][101][102] The
Senate bill gained 20 sponsors (19 Democrats
and one Independent) but was not voted
upon.[103][104]
* In 1994, while running for the U.S.
Senate, Mitt Romney was asked:
Mr. Romney, you personally oppose abortion
and as a church leader have advised women
not to have an abortion. Given that, how
could you in good conscience support a law
that enables women to have an abortion, and
even lets the Government pay for it? If
abortion is morally wrong, aren't you
responsible for discouraging it?
He responded in part:
I believe that Roe v. Wade has been the law
for 20 years, that we should sustain and
support it, and I sustain and support that
law and the right of a woman to make that
choice. And my personal beliefs, like the
personal beliefs of other people, should not
be brought into a political campaign.[105]
* In 2002, while announcing his candidacy
for governor of Massachusetts, Romney
stated, "On a personal basis, I don't favor
abortion. However, as governor of the
commonwealth, I will protect the right of a
woman to choose under the laws of the
country and the laws of the
commonwealth."[106]
* As the governor of Massachusetts during
2005, Romney vetoed a bill to expand access
to the ''morning-after pill" on the grounds
that it would "terminate a living embryo
after conception." Regarding this decision,
he wrote that his
convictions have evolved and deepened during
my time as governor. In considering the
issue of embryo cloning and embryo farming,
I saw where the harsh logic of abortion can
lead -- to the view of innocent new life as
nothing more than research material or a
commodity to be exploited.[107][108]
* In 2006, George Stephanopoulos of ABC News
asked Romney about his "change of heart on
the issue of abortion." Romney replied that
about 2.5 years ago, we were discussing
embryonic cloning, cloning and embryo
farming, and I had the provost of Harvard
University and the head of stem cell
research from Harvard there.
And at one point, we were talking about this
practice, this technique, and one of the
individuals said to me, "This isn't really a
moral issue."
I said, "Well, why is that?" They said,
"Well, because we destroy the embryo at 14
days."
And in my mind's eye, I saw rack after rack
of little embryos, of nascent humanity and
then them being destroyed or killed one
after the other.
And I said, "We have so cheapened the value
of human life in this society, that I want
to make it clear I'm pro-life."
The exchange continued:
Stephanopoulos: So if abortion is the taking
of a life, should women who have abortions
and doctors who perform them be jailed?
Romney: My view is that we should let each
state have its own responsibility for
guiding its laws relating to abortion.
Stephanopoulos: But if it's killing, why
should states have leeway?
Romney: You know, that's one of the great
challenges that we have. There are a lot of
things that are morally very difficult and,
in some cases, repugnant that we let states
decide.
For instance, Nevada allows prostitution. I
find that to be quite repugnant as a
practice.
Stephanopoulos: But murder is illegal in
every state.
Romney: And so we let states make some of
these very difficult decisions. That's one
of the difficulties here. [109]
* The Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution states: "nor shall any State
deprive any person of life, liberty, or
property, without due process of law; nor
deny to any person within its jurisdiction
the equal protection of the laws."[110]
(More details in the section on
Constitution and
Law.)
* In 2011, Romney wrote:
I am pro-life and believe that abortion
should be limited to only instances of rape,
incest, or to save the life of the mother.
I support the reversal of Roe v. Wade,
because it is bad law and bad medicine. Roe
was a misguided ruling that was a result of
a small group of activist federal judges
legislating from the bench.
I support the Hyde Amendment, which broadly
bars the use of federal funds for
abortions.[111]
* The President of the United States
appoints judges to the Supreme Court. These
appointments must be approved by a majority
of the Senate.[112] Senate rules allow for a
"filibuster," in which a vote to approve a
judge can be blocked unless 60 of the
Senate's 100 members agree to let it take
place.[113][114]
* Once seated, federal judges serve for life
unless they voluntarily resign or are
removed through impeachment, which requires
a majority vote of the House of
Representatives and two-thirds of the
Senate.[115]
* For more implications relating to the
appointment and approval of judges, see the
section on
Constitution and
Law.
* In June 2008, Howard Dean, the chairman of
the Democratic National Committee
stated that the Democratic Party "believes
that we ought to significantly reduce the
number of abortions in this country." A
reporter asked Dean how he could reconcile
this assertion with the party's support for
taxpayer funding of abortions. Dean replied
it is "total nonsense" that public funding
of abortions increases the abortion
rate.[116]
* According to the Guttmacher Institute, an
organization whose "Guiding Principles"
includes support for legalized abortion:
A 1994-1995 survey of abortion patients
found that in states where Medicaid pays for
abortions, women covered by Medicaid have an
abortion rate 3.9 times that of women who
are not covered, while in states that do not
permit Medicaid funding for abortions,
Medicaid recipients are only 1.6 times as
likely as nonrecipients to have
abortions.[117]
* The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)
supports the use of taxpayer funding to
perform abortions. In making its case for
this position, the ACLU poses the following
rhetorical question:
What about those who are morally or
religiously opposed to abortion?
And answers:
Our tax dollars fund many programs that
individual people oppose.[118]
* The ACLU is opposed to taxpayer funded
school choice programs. One of their
arguments for this stance is:
School voucher schemes would force all
taxpayers to support religious beliefs and
practices with which they may strongly
disagree.[119]
In the two decades before abortion was legal
in the United States, nearly one million
women went "underground" each year for
illegal operations. Thousands died for lack
of medical care.[120]
* No sources are cited for the statements
above. According to the U.S. Centers for
Disease Control, whose death statistics from
legal abortions have been accepted and used
by Planned Parenthood,[121][122][123] in
the year before Roe v. Wade (1972), there
were 39 deaths from illegal abortions. In
the year after Roe v. Wade (1974), there
were 26 deaths from legal abortions.[124]
* The following three graphs were
constructed to discern an effect of Roe v.
Wade on the collective rate of legal and
illegal abortion-related deaths:
* In 1988, the Centers for Disease Control
(CDC) reported that the coding system used
to classify pregnancy-related deaths
"precludes a determination of the real
causes of maternal death."[126] Hence, the
graph below was constructed to show the
incidence of all pregnancy-related deaths.
* In 1988, the CDC reported that the coding
system used to classify deaths in general is
inadequate because only a single code is
assigned to each death, but "several factors
may contribute to a death."[128] Hence, the
graph below was constructed to show the
death rate from all causes for women of
reproductive age.
* A fact sheet published by Planned
Parenthood states that
the risk of death associated with childbirth
is about 10 times as high as that associated
with all abortion (Christiansen & Collins,
2006).[130]
* "Christiansen & Collins, 2006" contains no
information about the risk of death
associated with abortion or childbirth. It
contains figures for the risk of death "once
a woman has become pregnant" as compared to
the number of live childbirths in the U.S.
These figures are not broken down to show
abortion or childbirth-related deaths.[131]
* Citing data from the CDC, a previous
version of the same Planned Parenthood fact
sheet states that the "risk of death
associated with childbirth is about 10 times
as high as that associated with
abortion."[132][133][134]
* The CDC has reported the following
information about the data it provides for
pregnancy-related deaths:
Codes placed by individual doctors on death certificates are the "core source" of
identifying pregnancy-related deaths.
(2001)[135] (2005)[136]
No "single source of information captures
all pregnancy-related deaths" because of
inadequate physician training and knowledge
in filling out death certificates, medical
records that "fail to indicate that the
events leading to death began with
pregnancy," and "medical and autopsy records
that cannot be located or are not available
for review." (2001)[137]
"Death certificates alone may not provide
adequate information on the sequence of
events that led to death. Ultimately a
single code is assigned to classify the
underlying cause of death. Often, however,
several factors may contribute to a death;
therefore, the death cannot be adequately
described with a unidimensional code."
(1988)[138]
The second most common method of
identifying pregnancy-associated deaths is
"computerized linking of deaths among women
of reproductive age with birth certificates
and fetal death certificates." (2005)[139]
In four cases in which this has been done,
the number of pregnancy-related fatalities
identified increased by 30%, 68%, 129% and
153%. (2001)[140]
One state out of 50 provides information
that can be used to link abortion data to
computerized death records. (2001)[141]
The "coding system used by national vital
statistics and states to describe maternal
deaths... precludes a determination of the
real causes of maternal death." (1988)[142]
"In most cases, the state is the level at
which pregnancy-related deaths are
reviewed...." (2001)[143]
States are not required to report their
abortion data to the CDC and privacy
agreements with certain states require
"strict confidentiality" on abortion-related
fatality data. (2008)[144][145]
* A 2002 national survey of physicians found
that 98% think the reporting of medical
practice errors is obstructed due to fear of
lawsuits.[146]
* From 1989 through 1992, the CDC's National
Center for Health Statistics reported zero
abortion-related deaths in the state of
Maryland.[147][148][149][150]
* During 1989 in the state of Maryland:
Erica Kae Richardson (16 years-old) was
admitted to an emergency room on March 1st
with a punctured uterus from an abortion
carried out earlier that day at a clinic in
Laurel, Maryland. She died shortly after
midnight on March 2nd.[151][152][153][154]
Paramedics arrived at an abortion clinic
in Suitland, Maryland on July 12th to find
Debra M. Gray (34 years-old) in cardiac
arrest after being administered anesthesia
without the presence of an anesthesiologist.
She was taken to a hospital and died three
days later.[155]
Paramedics arrived at an abortion clinic
in Suitland, Maryland on September 10th to
find Susanne Renee Logan (32 years-old) in
cardiac arrest with an oxygen mask placed
upside down on her face. It was found that
she had been given anesthesia without the
presence of an anesthesiologist, and when
she reacted to it, was given another drug
not indicated to mitigate the effects of the
anesthesia. The paramedics resuscitated Ms.
Logan, she stayed in a coma for four months,
and was generally paralyzed until her death
in 1992.[156][157][158]
Gladys Estanislao, a 28-year-old college
student, was found lifeless on a bathroom
floor 17 days after undergoing an abortion
procedure at a clinic in Bethesda, Maryland.
Her autopsy revealed that the pregnancy was
not in her womb but in her fallopian tube,
which caused it to rupture and resulted in
her death.[159][160][161] This condition,
called an ectopic pregnancy, is screened by
a blood test or ultrasound, has a mortality
rate of 1 in 2,000, and is typically
diagnosed on the first visit to a
gynecologist.[162][163][164]
* In 1987, the New York City Commissioner of
Health wrote a letter to abortion clinics
warning them to be careful about using too
much anesthesia. The letter stated:
During the period between 1981 and 1984,
there were 30 legal abortion-related deaths
in New York City.[165]
* For the same time period, the CDC's
Division of Reproductive Health reported a
total of 42 legal abortion-related deaths in
the United States.[166]
* If both of these numbers are accurate, it
would mean that 71% of the legal
abortion-related deaths in the United States
occurred in one city where about 3% of the
population lived.[167]
* An "Abortion Services" page on Planned
Parenthood's website states:
Abortion DOES NOT
Cause premature birth, birth defects or
low infant birth weight in future
pregnancies
Increase the chance of infant death in the
future[168]
* A 2007 paper in the Journal of
Reproductive Medicine cites 59 studies that
exhibit a statistically significant
association between abortion and the risk of
premature births in subsequent pregnancies.
In five of the largest and more recent of
these studies, all found increases in
premature births before 32 weeks gestation
in women who had an abortion. All of these
studies also found that this risk escalated
when more than one abortion was
performed.[169] Children born before 32
weeks gestation are at increased risks for
early death, cerebral palsy, blindness,
deafness and other health
complications.[170]
Serious emotional problems after abortion
are much less likely than they are after
giving birth.[171]
* A different page on the website of Planned
Parenthood states:
Serious, long-term emotional problems after
abortion are about as common as they are
after childbirth.[172][173]
* Another page on the website of Planned
Parenthood states:
Beware of so-called "crisis pregnancy
centers" that are anti-abortion. [They]
will lie to you about the medical and
emotional effects of abortion.[174]
* The country of Finland has socialized
medicine and keeps detailed health records
of its citizens.[175] A search of these
records over the years 1987-1994 found that
1,347 women of reproductive age (15-49 years
old) committed suicide. A 1996 study of this
data found that women who had an abortion
were about 5.9 times more likely to commit
suicide in the year following this event
than women who delivered a child:
* The State of California pays the costs of
childbirths and abortions for low income
women. A study of 173,279 California women
who had a state funded childbirth or
abortion in 1989 found that 53 of them
committed suicide within eight years of
their childbirth or abortion. A 2002 study
of this data found that women who had an
abortion were about 2.5 times more likely to
commit suicide in the eight years following
this event than women who delivered a child:
Several studies published in peer-reviewed
medical journals suggest that women who have
had abortions are more prone to depression
or drug abuse. But the research does not
prove cause and effect, [said Nada Stotland,
president-elect of the American Psychiatric
Association]. It may be, she said, that
women who have abortions are more
emotionally unstable in the first
place.[178]
* The California study cited above
controlled for mental disorders by
eliminating those women who had been treated
for a psychiatric problem in the year prior
to their childbirth or abortion. When this
was done, it was found that women who had an
abortion were about 3.3 times more likely to
commit suicide in the eight years following
this event than women who delivered a child:
* In October 2001, The Society of
Professional Journalists, "the nation's most
broad-based journalism organization,"[180]
adopted "Diversity Guidelines" reaffirming
"their commitment" to use "language that is
informative and not inflammatory." These
guidelines state that it is "misleading" to
use "word combinations" such as "Islamic
terrorist" or "Muslim extremist" "because
they link whole religions to criminal
activity." The same document states:
When writing about terrorism, remember to
include white supremacist, radical
anti-abortionists and other groups with a
history of such activity.[181]
* In April of 2007 at a Republican "Unity
Dinner" in Iowa, John McCain stated:
I have a steadfast and strong advocacy and
voting record in support of the rights of
the unborn.[182]
* At the same event, Mike Huckabee stated:
I'm not late in declaring that I believe
life begins at conception and that we ought
to protect human life....[183]
* In a New York Times article about this
event, reporter Adam Nagourney wrote that
John McCain and Mike Huckabee "presented
themselves as lifelong opponents of abortion
rights." Four times in this article,
Nagourney characterized the speakers as
opponents of abortion rights and never as
supporters of rights for the unborn.[184]
* Melloni's Illustrated Medical Dictionary
defines "partial-birth abortion" as follows:
Common term for termination of a late
pregnancy with a breech presentation [feet
facing downward instead of the head]. Labor
is induced by conventional methods; the
cervix is widely dilated and delivery is
expedited by evacuating the cranial contents
with a suction catheter, then compressing
the cranium.[193]
* Official policy of the American Medical
Association:
The term 'partial birth abortion' is not a
medical term. The AMA will use the term
"intact dilatation and extraction" (or
intact D&X)....[194]
* The American Medical Association's Manual
of Style states:
During an interview [with the news media],
authors should avoid use of
medical/scientific jargon, acronyms....[195]
* On the television show NOW with Bill
Moyers, PBS journalist Brenda Breslauer
stated:
The term "partial birth abortion" was
invented by the anti-abortion community to
describe a procedure in which a fetus is
partially delivered outside the womb.
Doctors don't even use the term.[196]
* The book English for Journalists states
that medical literature is a "common source"
of jargon and:
If you write for a newspaper or general
magazine you should try to translate jargon
into ordinary English whenever you can.[197]
* A 2005 house editorial in the Chicago
Tribune uses the term "intact dilation and
extraction" to identify "certain late-term
abortions." It does not contain the term
"partial-birth" and provides no description
of the procedure.[198]
* The New York Public Library Writer's Guide
to Style and Usage states:
When writing for a lay audience or the
general public, a writer should use jargon
only when necessary and define it carefully.
Where plain English serves equally well, it
should be used instead.[199][200]
* Roe v. Wade and its accompanying ruling,
Doe v. Bolton, mandate that abortion be
legal up until the point of birth if any one
physician willing to perform an abortion
says it is necessary to preserve a
mother's health.[201][202]
* In January 2002, the Gallup polling
organization reported:
If Roe v. Wade is presented only as
legalizing abortion in the first three
months, support for the decision is much
higher than if it is characterized as making
abortion legal throughout pregnancy or for
any reason.[203]
* Since this time, the Associated Press,
Quinnipiac University, the Pew Research
Center, NBC News, the Wall Street Journal,
and Harris Poll have all conducted polls in
which they characterized Roe v. Wade as
making abortion legal in the first "three
months of pregnancy."[204]
* In three articles published by the
Associated Press in 2007 and 2008, it is
asserted that the United States "permits
abortions within the first 12 weeks of
pregnancy."[205] Media outlets that carried
one or more of these stories include ABC,
CBS, MSNBC, Fox News, Yahoo News, AOL News,
USA Today, the Los Angeles Times,
Boston
Globe, Washington Post, and more than 50
other local, state, national and
international publications.[206]
* In July 2000, Nina Totenberg, National
Public Radio's "award-winning legal affairs
correspondent" stated:
Third-trimester abortions are banned in
every state except to save the life and the
health of the mother.[207][208]
* In an October 2003 house editorial, the
Washington Post stated that
most states already bar abortions after the
point of viability, unless the procedure is
necessary to preserve the life or health of
the mother....[209]
* None of the news items cited above mention
that "health," as defined by Roe v. Wade and
Doe v. Bolton, can include circumstances
such as the "stigma of unwed motherhood" and
the "distress" "associated with the unwanted
child."[210][211] (More details in the
section on
Constitution and
Law.)
* In 1987, Republican President Ronald
Reagan asked his Surgeon General, Dr. C.
Everett Koop, to prepare a "comprehensive
report" concerning "the health effects of
abortion on women."[212]
* In 1989, Koop wrote a letter to Reagan
stating that he and the staff people in
several Public Health Agencies reviewed
almost 250 studies and found that each had
flaws which prevented them from drawing
"scientifically sound conclusions."[213]
* That evening, Peter Jennings of ABC News
reported:
A new report by the Surgeon General
concludes that abortion causes little if any
physical or emotional harm to women.
Dan Rather of CBS News reported:
Surgeon General C. Everett Koop...reportedly
concluded that a woman who has an abortion
suffers little if any physical or emotional
harm from the experience.
Tom Brokaw of NBC News reported:
Koop reports he has not found conclusive
evidence that abortions have harmful
psychological effects on the women who have
them, but Koop found that there is a whole
segment of the population that says, quote,
"the best thing that happened to me was my
abortion."[214]
* Koop's letter did not state what Jennings,
Rather, or Brokaw said it did. It stated:
[T]here are almost 250 studies reported in
the scientific literature which deal with
the psychological aspects of abortion. All
of these studies were reviewed and the more
significant studies were evaluated by staff
in several of the Agencies of the Public
Health Service against appropriate criteria
and were found to be flawed
methodologically. In their view and mine,
the data do not support the premise that
abortion does or does not cause or
contribute to psychological problems.
[I]n spite of a diligent review on the
part of many in the Public Health Service
and in the private sector, the scientific
studies do not provide conclusive data about
the health effects of abortion on women.
(Click for full text of letter.)
* In 1985, the Los Angeles Times polled
3,165 newspaper reporters and editors
working at 621 newspapers. It found that
approximately 85% were in favor of abortion
being generally legal. The same poll found
that 51% of the general public were in favor
of abortion being generally legal.[215]
* In December 2001, Hal Bruno, the former
political director of ABC News, was asked
what percentage of people at ABC News were
"pro-choice." He replied:
Well, we have a tremendous number of women
that have come into journalism in the last
20 years and most women tend to be
pro-choice.[216]
* Below are the results of a Gallup poll
conducted 6 months before the interview:
Statement
Women Who Agree
Men Who Agree
Abortion should be legal under any circumstances
28%
23%
Abortion should be legal in most circumstances
14%
15%
Abortion should be legal in only a few circumstances
I'd say a majority of the people who work in
the news, not just at ABC, but who work in
the news, are pro-choice. But I think a
majority of the country probably is
pro-choice, too.[219]
* Four months prior to the interview, Gallup
conducted a poll which found:
46% of Americans consider themselves to be
pro-choice.
46% of Americans consider themselves to be
pro-life.[220]
26 states have a law in effect that
requires parental consent for a minor to
have an abortion.[221]
2 states have a parental consent law that
is blocked by a court order or ruling.[222]
11 states have a law in effect that
requires parental notification for a minor
to have an abortion.[223]
4 states have a parental notification law
that is blocked by a court order or
ruling.[224]
7 states have no laws requiring parental
consent or notification for abortions.[225]
* In the state of Washington, it is against
the law to apply a tattoo to anyone under
the age of 18.[226]
* In the state of New Jersey, it is against
the law to engage in a body piercing of
anyone under the age of 18 without written
consent from his or her parent or legal
guardian.[227]
* In the state of California, it is against
the law for anyone under the age of 18 to
use a tanning machine.[228]
* In Washington, New Jersey, and California,
it is legal for a girl of any age to get an
abortion without her parent's consent or
knowledge.[229]
* Five Gallup polls conducted from 1992
through 2011 found that 69-74% of Americans
favor "a law requiring women under 18 to get
parental consent for any abortion."
Opposition to this view ranged from
23-28%.[230]
* A 2005 CBS poll found 80% support for
requiring that "at least one parent be told
before a girl under 18 years of age could
have an abortion." Opposition to this view
was 17%.[231]
* A 2009 Pew poll found 76% support for
"requiring that women under the age of 18
get the consent of at least one parent
before they are allowed to have an
abortion." Opposition to this view was
19%.[232]
* In 1996, Barack Obama's Illinois Senate
campaign completed a candidate questionnaire
and then resubmitted it with amended answers
on the following day. In response to the
question, "Do you support parental
consent/notification for minors seeking
abortions?" the answers were:
Depends on how young possibly for
extremely young teens, i.e. 12 or 13 year
olds.[234] (9/10/96)
* When these questionnaires were published
by Politico.com during the 2008 Presidential
contest, Obama's campaign asserted that a
staffer filled them out and some of the
responses did not and do not reflect Obama's
views.[235][236]
* An investigation by Politico found that
one of the questionnaires contains written
notes that appear to be in Obama's hand, and
the other questionnaire has a cover sheet
indicating that Obama supplied the answers
in a face-to-face interview at the house of
a board member of the organization that
issued the questionnaire. The board member
has confirmed that Obama personally sat for
this interview. In response to these
revelations, Obama's presidential campaign
wrote:
He may have jotted some notes on the front
page of the questionnaire at the meeting,
but that doesn't change the fact that some
answers didn't reflect his views. His 11
years in public office do.[237][238][239]
* On a 2001 vote in the Illinois Senate for
a parental notification bill, Barack Obama
voted "Present."[240][241]
* Illinois Senate rules state that "a
majority of those elected" (30 Senators)
must vote in favor of a bill for it to pass.
Thus, a vote of "Present" has the same
result as a vote of "No."[242]
* With regard to Obama voting "Present" on
this and other abortion-related bills, Pam
Sutherland, the president and CEO of the
Illinois Planned Parenthood Council stated:
We at Planned Parenthood view those as
leadership votes. We worked with him
specifically on his strategy. A "present"
vote was hard to pigeonhole which is exactly
what Obama wanted. What it did was give
cover to moderate Democrats who wanted to
vote with us but were afraid to do so. A
"present" vote would protect them. Your
senator voted "present." Most of the
electorate is not going to know what that
means.[243][244]
* In response to a 2004 candidate
questionnaire that asked, "Do you support
parental notification or consent to obtain
an abortion?" Barack Obama's U.S. Senate
campaign answered:
Regarding parental notification, I would
oppose any legislation that does not include
a bypass provision for minors who have been
victims of, or have reason to fear, physical
or sexual abuse.[245]
* The 2001 parental notification bill on
which Obama voted "Present" had bypass
provisions for "sexual abuse," "neglect,"
"physical abuse," and cases where
notification "would not be in the best
interests of the minor."[246][247]
* In response to a 2007 candidate
questionnaire asking if minors should "be
required to seek their parents" consent
before having an abortion, Barack Obama's
presidential campaign did not explicitly
answer the question and stated that
most parental consent bills that come before
Congress or state legislatures criminalize
adults who attempt to help a young woman in
need and lack judicial bypass and other
provisions that would permit exceptions in
compelling cases.[248]
* As of 2008, all of the 35 states with a
parental consent or notification law in
effect has a bypass provision that permits
exceptions in various circumstances such as
when notifying a parent not be in a "minor's
best interests." This is also the case with
a Congressional bill that Obama
filibustered. Six of the seven states with a
parental consent or notification law blocked
by a court order or ruling have similar
bypass provisions. The one exception is New
Mexico, which has a 1969 law on its books
that the state attorney general ruled
unenforceable in 1990.[249][250][251]
* The Democratic Party Platform makes no
explicit reference to parental consent or
notification laws.[252] The Republican Party
Platform supports parental notification laws
and makes no explicit reference to parental
consent laws.[253]
* On September 16, 1988, 17-year-old Rebecca
Suzanne Bell of Indianapolis, Indiana was
admitted to a hospital with pneumonia and
suffered a fatal cardiopulmonary arrest that
night.[254] During her autopsy, "evidence of
recent pregnancy with recent partial
abortion" was discovered. The "cause of
death" listed on the autopsy report is
"Septic Abortion with Pneumonia" and the
"manner of death" as "Undetermined."[255]
According to Merriam-Webster's Medical
Dictionary, a "septic abortion" is a
"spontaneous or induced abortion associated
with bacterial infection " and pneumonia is
"a disease of the lungs that is caused
especially by infection."[256][257]
* Indiana had (and has) a parental consent
law in effect.[258][259] According to a
receipt from a local Planned Parenthood and
Becky's friend Heather Clark, the two of
them visited Planned Parenthood, where it
was suggested that Becky travel 100 miles to
Kentucky to circumvent the Indiana law.[260][261]
* Heather Clark stated that Becky chose not
to tell her parents about the pregnancy
because she was recently hospitalized with a
drug problem and thought that they would
kick her out of the house if they knew she
was pregnant.[262] Ms. Clark also stated
that after she and Becky went to Planned
Parenthood, Becky wavered about having an
abortion and considered running away and
putting the baby up for adoption.[263][264]
* The county coroner (who did not perform
the autopsy and is now deceased[265]) told
Becky's parents that she had died from
pneumonia and the source of the infection
was an illegal abortion performed with
unsterile instruments.[266][267][268] Her
parents came to blame Becky's death on
Indiana's parental consent law.[269] This
led to media attention and Becky's parents
embarking on a speaking tour of 23 states
with an advocacy group to lobby against
parental involvement laws.[270][271][272]
* Since this time, Becky Bell's case has
been cited as an argument against parental
consent laws on 60 Minutes,[273] ABC
News,[274] CNN's
Larry King Live,[275] in
the magazines Seventeen, Rolling Stone,[276]Newsweek,[277] an American Civil Liberties
Union pamphlet,[278] and an original HBO
movie named "Public Law 106: The Becky Bell
Story."[279] In the last three years, this
argument has been repeated in at least 13
different publications including a legal
journal.[280][281][282][283] When a
parental notification law was put on the
ballot in Oregon in 1990, polls found
opposition to it at 22%. After Becky's
parents toured the state appearing at
rallies and on television and talk shows,
the measure was defeated with 52% voting
against it.[284]
* Around the time that the Becky's parents
appeared on 60 Minutes,[285] James A.
Miller, the research director of an
organization dedicated to "promot[ing] and
defend[ing] the sanctity of life,"[286]
corresponded several times with Dr. Jesse
Giles, the author of the autopsy report and
one of two pathologists who signed it.[287]
In an editorial published in the Baltimore
Evening Sun and in a press release, Miller
wrote that Giles said:
He used word "abortion" on the autopsy
report in the sense of a spontaneous
abortion (i.e., miscarriage[288]); not an
induced abortion.
He was "astounded" that 60 Minutes and
Becky's parents "would assert that my
(autopsy) report proves that there was an
instrumented, illegal abortion."
He did not write the word "septic" on the
autopsy report. Another pathologist placed
the word "septic" in front of the word
"abortion" on the report's cover page.[289][290]
* When contacted by Just Facts, Dr. Giles
refused to answer any questions.[291]
* The other pathologist who signed the
autopsy report was Dr. John Pless. He
supervised the autopsy, as Dr. Giles was a
fellow in training at the time.[292] In a
1990 newspaper article, Dr. Pless is quoted
as stating, "I cannot prove she had anything
but a spontaneous abortion [i.e.,
miscarriage]," but that he found evidence of
infection in Becky's reproductive system,
and thus it seemed probable that an induced
abortion was performed.[293]
* The description of the reproductive system
in the autopsy report contains no mention of
an infection.[294]
* When contacted by Just Facts, Pless
confirmed his view as quoted above and
stated that the "same micro-organism" that
caused the pneumonia "was cultured in the
uterus and the lung."[295] When
Just Facts
pointed out the autopsy report contains a
list of "Specimens for Culture"
that does
not include the uterus,[296]
Pless said his
memory may be faulty, but "the only possible
source of the infection was the uterus"
because there "was no upper airway disease -
so the only possibility was spread from the
uterus."[297][298]
* When Just Facts informed Dr. Pless that:
a 2006 paper in the Journal of Medical
Microbiology states that the type of
bacteria found in Becky's lungs exists in
various strains that selectively infect
specific body tissues,[299][300]
two recent medical texts indicate that the
type of pneumonia Becky had is typically
preceded (not accompanied) by mild upper
airway disease,[301][302]
and
therefore, the absence of upper airway
disease does not indicate that the bacteria did
not enter through the upper airway, he
responded:
I suppose that you could make an argument
for almost anything. I have no reason to
modify the report.[303]
* The HBO movie cited above shows Becky
going with a friend to obtain an illegal
abortion.[304][305] All primary sources
researched for this case contain no
testimony or documentation of such an event.
This includes the coroner's report,[306]
autopsy report,[307] Becky's mother's
written account,[308] and an article in the
Cleveland Plain Dealer in which the reporter
quotes Becky's father and her "closest
friend" Heather Clark. Ms. Clark, who
accompanied Becky to Planned Parenthood,
told the reporter that Becky did not have an
induced abortion. She also said that when
she visited Becky (four days after she had
gotten sick and the night before she passed
on), Becky asked her to schedule an abortion
in Louisville, Kentucky for two days
later.[309]
Events in the week prior to Becky's death (as reported in the coroner's report, autopsy report, Becky's mother's written account, and Cleveland Plain Dealer)
Sunday12:45 AM
Becky comes home from a party and says she
thinks someone put cocaine or speed in her
drink and that she feels like she's "got the
flu like Dad."[310][311]
Becky stays home from school and develops a
104 fever. Her parents try to take her to
the doctor, but Becky resists and they
relent.[313][314][315]
Thursday PM
Heather Clark visits Becky, and Becky asks
her to schedule an abortion in Kentucky on
Saturday.[316]
Friday
Becky starts bleeding and tells her Mom.
Becky agrees to go a doctor, who diagnoses
her with pneumonia and sends her to the
hospital, arriving at 4 PM.[317][318][319]
Friday PM
The doctor says to Becky's family: "We don't
know if we can save the baby."[320] 11:29
PM: Becky passes on.[321]
* In March 1989, six months after Becky
Bell's death, 16-year-old Erica Kae
Richardson of Cheltenham, Maryland was
assisted by her aunt in obtaining an
abortion without her mother's consent or
knowledge. Erica's aunt, a registered nurse,
first took her to Washington Hospital
Center, which would not perform the abortion
because the pregnancy was 19 weeks along.
She then took her to the Metropolitan
Women's Center in Laurel, where Dr. Gene
Crawford carried out the abortion,
puncturing her uterus in the process. Erica
died several hours later from "rupture of
[her] lower uterus and cervix with
complications, including hemorrhage into the
pelvic cavity surrounding the uterus and air
embolism."[322][323][324][325]
* The current Maryland notification law
allows abortion providers to bypass
notifying a parent if, in their opinion, the
minor is "capable of giving informed consent
to an abortion." The law also stipulates
that abortion providers cannot be prosecuted
or sued for failing to notify a girl's
parents.[326]
* A 2000 U.S. Department of Justice study of
crimes reported to law enforcement agencies
in twelve states from 1991-1996, found that
the incidence of forcible rape peaked at the
ages of 14 and 15.
* A 1987 survey of U.S. woman aged 18-22,
found that of those who had intercourse at
15 years of age or younger, 40% had been
forced to have sex against their will or
were raped.[328][329]
* A 2006 U.S. Department of Justice study
found that 58% of female forcible rape
victims were raped before their 18th
birthday.[330]
* Arkansas law requires written consent of a
parent (not a step-parent) before an
abortion is performed upon a female who is
less than 18 years of age.[331] In 2006, a
15-year-old Arkansas girl accused her
41-year-old stepfather of raping her,
getting her pregnant, forcing her to have an
abortion in Illinois (where there is no
parental consent or notification law in
effect), and continuing to rape her
afterwards.[332][333][334][335]
* The girl's claim that she was taken to an
abortion clinic in Granite City, Illinois
was corroborated by a photo of her
stepfather's car at this facility.[336] He
was arrested, charged with a dozen counts of
rape and committed suicide before
trial.[337][338]
* In 2006, the U.S. House of Representatives
passed a bill that would have made it
illegal to take a minor across state lines
to circumvent state laws that require
parental involvement in a minor's abortion.
It required that abortion providers in
states without parental involvement laws
give at least 24 hours' notice to a parent
before performing an abortion on a minor who
resides in another state. This provision
included exceptions for parental abuse,
neglect, and if the physical health of the
minor is endangered.[339] 93% of Republicans
voted for it and 71% of Democrats voted
against it. (Click for a record of how each
Representative voted.)
* After being approved by the House, the
bill was sent to the Senate where it was
blocked by a filibuster conducted by 37
Democrats, 4 Republicans, and 1 Independent.
Participants in the filibuster included
Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, Barack Obama,
Robert Menendez, and Susan Collins. (Click
for a record of how each Senator voted.)
* A sexual relationship between a
22-year-old man and a 13-year-old girl is
illegal in all 50 states and the District of
Columbia.[340] All states have laws
requiring healthcare and other workers who
interact with children in a professional
capacity to report suspected cases of child
abuse, which in 29 states and the District
of Columbia, explicitly includes a sexual
relationship between a 22-year-old man and a
13-year-old girl.[341]
* In 2002, Life Dynamics, an organization
dedicated to ending legal abortion,[342]
phoned more than 800 Planned Parenthood and
National Abortion Federation abortion
clinics and offices. In these calls, a woman
from Life Dynamics told workers at these
facilities that she was 13-years-old, had
been impregnated by her 22-year-old
boyfriend, and wanted to get an abortion to
hide the situation from her parents.[343]
* In more than 90% of the phone calls, the
Planned Parenthood and National Abortion
Federation workers did not act to report the
matter.[344]
* Some workers encouraged the caller to come
in for the abortion and lie about the age of
the person who impregnated her.[345]
* Some workers told the caller that they
were required to report the situation, but
weren't going to do so.[346]
* In states that have parental notification
laws, some workers told the caller to find a
person who was old enough to impersonate one
of her parents and have them sign the
required paperwork. In one state that
requires a notarized signature from a
parent, a worker told the caller that the
facility had a notary public who would
notarize a fraudulent signature for
her.[347]
* After Life Dynamics released the
recordings, Planned Parenthood issued the
following statement:
Planned Parenthood questions the reliability
of staged tapes of supposed telephone
conversations surreptitiously prepared by
Life Dynamics, an organization with a
notorious anti-Planned Parenthood
agenda.[348]
* A Connecticut TV station (WTIC Fox 61)
scrutinized the recordings of the phone
calls to the abortion clinics in
Connecticut. They found that the dial tones
recorded on the tapes matched the phone
numbers of the facilities, the names of the
people on the tapes matched the names of the
workers at the facilities, and the content
of the conversations matched what was
reported by Life Dynamics.[349]
* In briefs submitted to the United States
Supreme Court regarding a Minnesota parental
consent law,[350] the American Psychological
Association asserted that the law should be
struck down on the grounds that
most adolescents are competent to make
informed decisions about important life
situations.
In fact, by middle adolescence (age 14-15)
young people develop abilities similar to
adults in reasoning about moral dilemmas,
understanding social rules and laws, and
reasoning about interpersonal relationships
and interpersonal problems.[351]
In sum, the unvarying and highly significant
findings of numerous scientific studies
indicate that with respect to the capacity
to understand and reason logically, there is
no qualitative or quantitative difference
between minors in mid-adolescence, i.e.,
about 14-15 years of age, and adults.[352]
* In a brief submitted to the United States
Supreme Court regarding a death penalty
sentence in Missouri for a person who
committed a capital murder at the age of 17,[353] the American Psychological Association
asserted that crimes committed by minors
should never be subject to the death penalty
on the grounds that:
Adolescent decision-makers on average are
less future-oriented and less likely to
consider properly the consequences of their
actions.
In comparison with adults, studies show that
adolescents are less likely to consider
alternative courses of action, understand
the perspective of others, or restrain
impulses. In a study of more than 1,000
adolescents and adults it was not until
age 19 that this development of responsible
decisionmaking plateaued.
In another analysis of decision-making
competence the researchers concluded "it
is clear that important progress in the
development of decision-making competence
occurs sometime during late adolescence.
these changes have a profound effect on
their ability to make consistently mature
decisions."[354]
* A partial-birth abortion, as described in
American Medical News (a publication
of the American Medical Association[355]),
entails
the extraction of an intact fetus, feet
first, through the birth canal, with all but
the head delivered. The surgeon forces
scissors into the base of the skull, spreads
them to enlarge the opening, and uses
suction to remove the brain.[356][357][358][359]
* According to the executive director of the
National Coalition of Abortion Providers,
this procedure was typically performed at
20+ weeks (not specified if this is after
conception or last menstrual period).[360]
* Preborn human at 20 weeks gestation (22
weeks after last menstrual period):
* In June 1995, Republican Congressman
Charles Canady of Florida sponsored a bill
to ban the use of the partial-birth abortion
procedure on live preborn humans except if
"necessary to save the life of a
mother."[362] It was cosponsored by 20
Democrats and 135 Republicans.[363] This
bill passed Congress with 90% of Republicans
voting for it and 62% of Democrats voting
against it. It was vetoed by Democratic
President Bill Clinton. A vote to override
the veto passed in the House and failed in
the Senate by 8 votes.[364][365]
* In March 1997, Republican Congressman
Gerald Solomon of New York sponsored a bill
to ban the use of the partial-birth abortion
procedure on live preborn humans except if
"necessary to save the life of a
mother."[366] It passed Congress with 95% of
Republicans voting for it and 62% of
Democrats voting against it. It was vetoed
by Democratic President Bill Clinton. A vote
to override the veto passed in the House and
failed in the Senate by 3 votes.[367][368]
* During the period in which these bills
were being debated:
The executive director of the National
Abortion Federation told the press that the
partial-birth abortion procedure "is not
taking place on live fetuses, the way it's
being portrayed. The fetal demise has
already occurred...."[369]
Dr. Martin Haskell, who is credited with
inventing the procedure,[370] sent a letter
to Congress asserting, "Statements that
fetuses are not dead until nearly the end of
the procedure are not accurate. Death occurs
early in the procedure if not before."[371]
Two years earlier, American Medical News
interviewed Dr. Haskell and reported:
Dr. Haskell and another doctor who routinely
use the [partial-birth] procedure for late
term abortions told AMNews that the majority
of fetuses aborted this way are alive until
the end of the procedure.[372]
After it was pointed out that this article
conflicted with his assertion to
Congress,[373] Haskell and the National
Abortion Federation wrote letters to
Congress stating that he and the other
doctor had been "quoted out of
context."[374][375] Consequently, the
publication, which had tape-recorded the
interviews, released a transcript of the
contested quotes. When the interviewer said,
"Let's talk first about whether or not the
fetus is dead beforehand," Haskell
responded:
No it's not. No, it's really not. A
percentage are for various numbers of
reasons. [I]n my case, I would say
probably about a third of those are
definitely dead before I actually start to
remove the fetus. And probably the other
two-thirds are not.[376]
Dr. James McMahon, the other doctor
interviewed for the American Medical News
article, sent a letter to Congress affirming
that a preborn human "feels no pain through
the entire series of procedures" because the
mother is given an anesthetic beforehand,
which induces "a medical coma" and
"neurological fetal demise."[377]
Afterwards, the President of the American
Academy of Anesthesiologists, the
President-Elect of the Society for Obstetric
Anesthesia and Perinatology, the Chair of
the Department of Anesthesiology at the
University of Alabama Birmingham Hospital,
and an Associate Professor at the Department
of Pediatrics and Anesthesiology at Emory
University testified before Congress
regarding the effects of anesthesia given
during partial-birth abortions. A monthly
newsletter of the American Academy of
Anesthesiologists summarized the hearing as
follows:
Testimony of all the anesthesiology
witnesses was consistent, disputing at
length the claim that anesthesia given to
the mother during a late-term abortion
caused neurological demise of the fetus. All
of the witnesses expressed concern that
widespread dissemination of this false claim
by the media has caused many women to
question whether to undergo necessary
surgery during pregnancy, for fear of
injuring the unborn child.[378]
The transcript of the interview with Dr.
Haskell also revealed that he stated:
And I'll be quite frank: most of my
abortions are elective in that 20-24 week
range.... In my particular case, probably
20% are for genetic reasons. And the other
80% are purely elective....[379][380][381]
One week after this information was
released in a congressional report,[382] the
American Civil Liberties Union, National
Organization for Women, People For the
American Way and 50 other organizations sent
a joint letter to Congress stating that
partial-birth abortions were "most often
performed" in cases "of severe fetal
anomalies or a medical condition that
threatens the pregnant woman's life or
health."[383]
One month after this, Planned Parenthood
issued a press release asserting that
partial-birth abortions are performed "only in
cases when the woman's life is in danger or
in cases of extreme fetal abnormality."[384]
One week after this, the executive
director of the National Coalition of
Abortion Providers appeared on ABC's
Nightline and stated that
partial-birth
abortions were done only in extreme
situations of danger to a woman's life and
fetal anomalies.[385][386][387]
Four months after this, the national
policy director of Planned Parenthood
testified to Congress: "The truth is that
the procedure is only used when the woman's
life or health is in danger or in cases of
extreme fetal anomaly."[388]
Six months later, two doctors at a New
Jersey abortion clinic spoke with a local
newspaper under condition of anonymity. They
independently stated that their clinic
was performing roughly 1,500 partial-birth
abortions per year, most of which are elective
and not for medical reasons.[389][390]
Six months after this, the executive
director of the National Coalition of
Abortion Providers told the New York Times
and American Medical News that he "lied
through [his] teeth" when he appeared on
Nightline because he was afraid that
the truth would erode public support for
abortion. Disowning his previous
statements, he stated that partial-birth
abortions are "primarily done on healthy
women and healthy fetuses...."[391][392]
The same week this information was
published, Renee Chelian, president of the
National Coalition of Abortion Providers
stated:
The spin out of Washington was that it was
only done for medical necessity, even though
we knew it wasn't so. I kept waiting for
[the National Abortion Federation] to
clarify it and they never did. I got caught
up: What do we do about this secret? Who do
we tell and what happens when we tell? But
frankly, no one was asking me, so I didn't
have to worry.[393]
* In February 2003, Republican Senator Rick
Santorum of Pennsylvania sponsored a bill to
ban the use of the partial-birth abortion
procedure on live preborn humans except if
"necessary to save the life of a
mother."[394] It was cosponsored by 2
Democrats and 43 Republicans.[395] Congress
passed this bill with 95% of Republicans
voting for it and 62% of Democrats voting
against it. It was then signed into law by
Republican President George W. Bush.[396][397]
(Click for a record of how each
Congressman voted.)
* This law does not ban late-term abortions;
only the partial-birth procedure.[398] It
does not prohibit giving a lethal injection
to a preborn human and performing a
partial-birth abortion afterwards.[399] It does not
prohibit dismemberment abortions, in which
"the fetal limbs are pulled off the body in utero, sometimes while the fetus is still
alive."[400][401]
* After this law was enacted, several
abortion providers challenged it in
court.[402] In April 2007, the U.S. Supreme
Court upheld the constitutionality of the
law in a 5-4 vote.[403] Of the five Supreme
Court justices who ruled to uphold the law,
Barack Obama voted against the nomination of
two of them and identified two of the others
as judges he would not have nominated.[404][405][406]
* The day after the Supreme Court ruling was
issued, 13 Democrats in the U.S. Senate and
57 in the House of Representatives
introduced legislation that would overturn
the ban on partial-birth abortions.[407][408][409][410] Barack Obama stated that
the "first thing" he would do as President
is sign this bill into law.[411]
* In March of 1970, a pregnant woman by the
name of Norma McCorvey sued the state of
Texas to challenge the constitutionality of
a state law that prohibited abortion except
to save the life of the mother. McCorvey
wanted to keep her identity secret and
assumed the fictitious name Jane Roe. The
name of the Dallas County district attorney
responsible for enforcing the law was Henry
Wade. Thus, the case was entitled Roe v.
Wade.[412][413][414]
* Before the United States Supreme Court,
the attorney for Roe argued that the Texas
law was unconstitutional because it violated
the Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments.[415]
The Ninth Amendment reads:
The enumeration in the Constitution, of
certain rights, shall not be construed to
deny or disparage others retained by the
people.[416]
The clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
relevant to the argument reads:
No State shall deprive any person of life,
liberty, or property, without due process of
law....[417]
* In support of this view, the attorney for
Roe stated that "liberty to these women
would mean liberty from being forced to
continue the unwanted pregnancy."[418]
* During oral arguments, one of the judges
asked the attorney for Roe if her case was
dependent on the assertion that pre-born
humans have no Constitutional rights. After
some back and forth, the attorney for Roe
responded:
Even if the Court at some point determined
the fetus to be entitled to constitutional
protection, you would still get back into
the weighing of one life against another.
After more back and forth, another judge
said to Roe's attorney:
[To take this position],
you'd have to say that this
would be the equivalent after
the child was born if the mother
thought it bothered her health
any having the child around, she
could have it killed. Isn't that
correct?
The attorney for Roe responded:
That's correct. That
At this point, the Chief Justice cut her off
and started to ask another question. He then
interrupted himself and asked:
Did you want to respond further to Justice
Stewart? Did you want to respond further to
him?
* The attorney for the State of Texas argued
that preborn humans are protected under the
Fifth Amendment.[420] The portion relevant
to the argument states:
No person shall be deprived of life,
liberty, or property, without due process of
law....[421]
* During oral arguments, one of the judges
contested this viewpoint by asserting that
the Fourteenth Amendment defined what the
term "person" meant, and that it did not
include preborn humans.[422] The relevant
clause reads:
All persons born or naturalized in the
United States, and subject to the
jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the
United States and of the State wherein they
reside.[423]
* After some back and forth, the judge
retreated from this position and said:
[I suppose] that's not the definition of a
person but that's the definition of a
citizen.[424]
* The attorney for the State of Texas
responded that the only way to understand
what the Constitution means by the word
"person" was to go to "the teachings at the
time the Constitution was framed." He then
quoted from William Blackstone, who is
described in Simon & Shuster's New
Millennium Encyclopedia as a "British jurist
and legal scholar, whose work Commentaries
on the Laws of England was used for more
than a century as the foundation of all
legal education in Great Britain and the
U.S."[425] In this work, Blackstone wrote
that life is a "right" that
is inherent by nature in every individual,
and exists even before the child is
born.[426]
* To further support his position, the
attorney for the state of Texas appealed to
the Declaration of Independence and started
to quote the following sentence from it, but
he was cut off by one of judges:
[427]
WE hold these [cut off] Truths to be
self-evident, that all Men are created
equal, that they are endowed by their
Creator with certain unalienable Rights,
that among these are Life, Liberty and the
Pursuit of Happiness.[428]
* On January 22, 1973, the Supreme Court
released its ruling. Seven of the judges
ruled in favor of Roe and two of the judges
opposed the ruling. The ruling overturned
the laws of 30 states that generally prohibited
abortion except to save the life of the
mother.[429]
* The majority ruled these laws
unconstitutional on the basis that they
violated the Fourteenth Amendment, stating
that it protects "the right to privacy," and
that this includes "a woman's qualified
right to terminate her pregnancy."[430] The
relevant portion of the Fourteenth Amendment
reads:
No State shall deprive any person of life,
liberty, or property, without due process of
law....[431]
* The Fourteenth Amendment does not contain
the word "privacy" or any synonym for it.[432][433] It was adopted in 1868 to
address a number of issues relevant to the
Civil War, such as ensuring constitutional
rights for black people.[434]
* The majority wrote that they were "not in
a position to speculate" as to "when life
begins" and criticized the State of Texas
for "adopting one theory of life," namely,
that life begins at conception.[435]
* They also:
Used the term "potentiality of human life"
in reference to preborn humans who are
capable of living outside the mother's
womb.[436]
Ruled that preborn humans have no
Constitutional rights.[437]
* The majority created rules regarding the
types of abortion legislation that states
could enact based upon the three trimesters
of a typical pregnancy:
First trimester: States cannot prohibit
abortions. They can require that abortions
be done by licensed physicians, but other
than this, they cannot regulate the manner
in which they are performed.[438] In an
internal court memo written before the
ruling was issued and made public 15 years
later, the author of the decision (Justice
Harry Blackmun) wrote that the ruling
contains "dictum," and this first trimester
timeframe is "arbitrary."[439][440] (Click
for full text of letter.)
Second trimester: States cannot prohibit
abortions. They can regulate the manner in
which they are performed for the purpose of
protecting the mother's health. The ruling
cites examples of the types of regulations
that are permissible. These include
establishing "qualifications [for] the
person who is to perform the abortion" and
setting rules regarding "the facility in
which the procedure is to be
performed."[441]
Third trimester: States can prohibit
abortions after "viability" (meaning the
point where a preborn human is capable of
living outside their mother's womb), but
they cannot prohibit abortions "where it is
necessary, in appropriate medical judgment,
for the preservation of the life or health
of the mother."[442] The ruling cites
examples of what may be considered harmful
to a woman's health. These include the
"stigma of unwed motherhood," the work of
caring for a child, and the "distress"
"associated with the unwanted child."[443][444]
After listing these examples and others, the
majority wrote that this portion of their
ruling does not permit abortions "at
whatever time, in whatever way, and for
whatever reason" a woman chooses.[445] They
repeated this assertion four times using
varying words but listed no example of a
circumstance where abortion could be
prohibited.[446]
* On the same day that the Supreme Court
released Roe v. Wade, it issued another
ruling in a case entitled Doe v. Bolton. The
same seven judges who ruled in favor of Roe
also ruled in favor of Doe, and the same two
judges opposed the ruling.[447] The majority
wrote that this ruling and Roe v. Wade "are
to be read together."[448]
* In this case, the State of Georgia had a
law prohibiting abortions unless the
pregnancy would "seriously and permanently"
injure the health of the mother.[449] A
lower court struck down this law and the
majority of the Supreme Court agreed. The
ruling stated that abortion laws with
exceptions for the health of the mother must
allow for factors such as emotional health,
psychological health, familial concerns, and
the woman's age.[450]
* The Georgia law also required that the
doctor who would perform the abortion, two
other doctors, and a committee of the
medical staff at the hospital where the
abortion was to be done needed to agree that
the abortion was necessary to preserve the
health of the mother.[451] The lower court
upheld this law and the Supreme Court struck
it down. The majority ruled that only the
doctor who would perform the abortion needs
to determine that the abortion was necessary
to preserve the health of the mother. Any
abortion provider could make this decision
based solely on their "best clinical
judgment."[452]
* Dr. Warren Hern is a late-term abortion
practitioner, author of "the nation's most
widely used textbook on abortion standards
and procedures," a participant in crafting
"the first version of the National Abortion
Federation Program Standards for Abortion
Services," and "one of the experts in late
abortion sought out by the national
media...."[453][454] In May 1997, he
stated:
I say every pregnancy carries a risk of
death.[455]
I will certify that any pregnancy is a
threat to a woman's life and could cause
grievous injury to her physical health.
[456]
* In 1992, the Supreme Court decided a case
entitled Planned Parenthood v. Casey. In
this case, the majority reaffirmed the
central element of Roe v. Wade, but did away
with the "rigid trimester framework."[457]
* As in Roe v. Wade, the majority ruled that
states cannot prohibit abortions prior to
viability, and laws that prohibit abortion
after viability must include an exception
for the "health of the mother."[458] (With
regard to viability, as of 2007, the
youngest premature baby to survive was born
at 21 weeks and 6 days gestation.[459])
* Contrary to Roe v. Wade, the majority
ruled that states could enact laws that
regulated abortion throughout pregnancy, as
long as they did not create a substantial
obstacle to obtaining an abortion. An
example of what would be acceptable is a law
requiring that doctors provide women with
certain information before they perform
abortions.[460]
* A 2007 British study found that 3.2% of
preborn humans aborted on the basis of
diagnoses for conditions such as Down's
Syndrome, heart defects, and kidney
problems, survived for a median time of 80
minutes after birth, 36% of them for an hour
or less, 6% for six hours or more.[461]
* The Encyclopedia of Human Biology states:
Attempts to suckle have been seen in
aborted fetuses of 3 months.[462]
* In 2003, a child was born in Britain at 24
weeks gestation following three abortion
procedures. As of 2005, he is healthy and is
the "first long-term abortion survivor" to
be born this prematurely.[463][464]
* In 2007, twin brothers Ieuan and Gabriel
Jones were born at 31 weeks gestation.
Eleven weeks before this, it was found that
Gabriel was underweight and his heart three
times normal size. Doctors thought he would
die and suggested an abortion to protect the
life of his twin. An attempt was made to
sever his umbilical cord, but doctors were
unable to cut through it. Subsequently, the
mother's placenta was cut in half to isolate
the twins from one another. The boys were
delivered via caesarian section, and as of
November 2007, were seven months old and
both healthy.[465] (Click for photos.)
* In 2007, Finely Crampton was born three
weeks premature after an attempted abortion
at 8 weeks. His mother previously gave birth
to two boys with kidney disorders, one of
whom died after 20 minutes, and another who
has one kidney. She was on the birth control
pill when she became pregnant and decided to
abort because she "couldn't cope with the
anguish of losing another baby." At 19
weeks, she discovered the abortion was not
successful and decided to carry to term. As
of June 2008, Finley is 6 months old, "has
minor kidney damage," and is "expected to
lead a normal life."[466] (Click for photo.)
* Gianna Jessen was born in 1977 after
surviving an abortion at seven-and-a-half
months gestation.[467][468] She has
cerebral palsy as a result of the procedure
but has run marathons and traveled "the world to campaign
against abortion."[469][470]
* In July 2000, two registered nurses who
worked in the labor and delivery unit of
Christ Hospital in Oak Lawn, Illinois
testified before a U.S. Congressional
subcommittee. Both described instances at
the hospital in which they had personally
seen babies who were born alive after an
abortion and left to die without any care or
comfort provided.[471][472] A spokesman for
the hospital's parent corporation estimated
that 10-20% of the abortions it performs on
preborn humans with genetic defects result
in live births for short periods of
time.[473]
* In 2001 and 2002, identical bills were
introduced in the Illinois legislature with
three paragraphs of operative text stating
that anyone "born alive at any stage of
development" is considered a "person" under
Illinois state law including those born as a
result of "abortion."[474][475] Barack
Obama, as an Illinois state senator, voted
against both of these bills.[476][477]
* In 2002, the U.S. House of Representatives
passed by a voice vote, the U.S. Senate
passed by unanimous consent, and President
Bush signed a bill stating that anyone "born
alive at any stage of development" is
considered a "person" under federal law
including those born as a result of
"abortion."[478][479][480] This bill
contained the same operative language as the
Illinois bill except for the following
paragraph.
Federal bill:
(c) Nothing in this section shall be
construed to affirm, deny, expand, or
contract any legal status or legal right
applicable to any member of the species homo
sapiens at any point prior to being 'born
alive' as defined in this section.
Illinois Bill:
(c) A live child born as a result of an
abortion shall be fully recognized as a
human person and accorded immediate
protection under the law.
* At a debate in October 2004, Barack Obama
was criticized for voting against the
Illinois bills and replied:
At the federal level there was a similar
bill that passed because it had an amendment
saying this does not encroach on Roe vs.
Wade. I would have voted for that bill.[481]
* In 2003, an amendment was proposed to an
Illinois bill to make the operative language
the same as the federal bill that Obama said
he would have voted for.[482][483] The
amendment was referred to a committee
chaired by Obama, where it was unanimously
passed. The bill was then voted down by
Obama and five other Democrats on the
committee.[484][485][486][487]
Footnotes
[1] Entry: "child."
Webster's College
Dictionary. Simon & Schuster, 1999.
Definition 1a: "an unborn or recently born
person."
[2] Entry: "Fetus."
Black's Medical
Dictionary. Edited by Dr. Harvey Marcovich.
41st edition. Scarecrow Press, 2006. Pages
269-270. Page 269: "The name given to the
unborn child after the eighth week of
development."
[3] Entry: "baby."
Webster's College
Dictionary. Simon & Schuster, 1999.
Definition 1a: "an extremely young child;
especially: infant."
[4] Entry: "Neonatal Intensive Care."
Black's Medical Dictionary. Edited by Dr.
Harvey Marcovich. 41st edition. Scarecrow
Press, 2006.
Page 487: "The provision of a dedicated unit
with special facilities, including
one-to-one nursing and appropriate
technology, for caring for premature and
seriously ill newborn babies."
The etymology of this word is: "Middle
English, from Latin, act of bearing young,
offspring; akin to Latin fetus newly
delivered, fruitful more at feminine."
[6] Entry: "fetus." Dorland's Illustrated
Medical Dictionary. 29th edition. W. B.
Saunders Company, 2000. Page 661.
Page 661: "of or pertaining to a fetus;
pertaining to in utero development after the
embryonic period."
[8] Textbook: Langman's Medical Embryology.
By T. W. Sadler. Ninth edition. Lippincott
Williams & Wilkins, 2004.
Page 117: "The period from the beginning of
the ninth week to birth is known as the
fetal period."
[9] For example, in April of 2001, the U.S.
House of Representatives passed the "Unborn
Victims of Violence Act." This bill would
make it a crime for someone to harm a "child
in utero." (It does not apply to any
situation relating to an abortion with the
consent of the mother.) The bill defines a
child in utero as "a member of the species
homo sapiens, at any stage of development,
who is carried in the womb." In their
coverage of this vote, CNN, Reuters, the New
York Times, Washington Post, ABC,
USA Today,
MSNBC, and CBS all used the word "fetus" or
"fetal" as a blanket phrase for humans at
any stage prior to birth. As shown by
Black's Medical Dictionary and
Dorland's
Illustrated Medical Dictionary, their
application of this term is inaccurate.
NOTE: This column criticizes the Associated
Press for misapplying the word "fetus" to
humans who are born alive after an abortion.
As shown by Black's Medical Dictionary and
the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, their application of this
term is inaccurate. The same applies to the
next example.
"Republicans are gearing up campaigns to
depict Mr. Obama as a radical on the
question of abortion, because as a state
senator in Illinois he opposed a ban on the
killing of fetuses born alive."
[12] Press Release: "RCOG Statement on the
article 'One baby in 30 left alive after
medical termination' (London Daily Mail, 20
April 2007)." Royal College of Obstetricians
and Gynaecologists, April 20, 2007.
http://www.rcog.org.uk/index.asp?PageID=1925
"If the fetus has had a lethal injection, it
will normally die. However, there are some
instances when there are signs of life at
birth. All babies must be treated with
dignity and respect. Palliative care should
be provided till the baby dies where
relevant."
NOTE: Observe that the Royal College of
Obstetricians and Gynaecologists utilizes
the word "baby" after the point of birth.
[13] "Commentary: "Fetus or baby?" By
Christine Chinlund. Boston Globe, February
17, 2003. http://www.boston.com/
"Some pretty impartial sources, from the
American College of Obstetricians and
Gynecologists to Webster's Dictionary, say
that any unborn child is considered a
fetus."
NOTE: Later in the column, the author quotes
the following definition of "fetus" from
Webster's, which does not support the
assertion she made: "An unborn offspring,
especially in its later stages and
specifically in humans, from about the
eighth week after conception until birth."
The author did not attempt to substantiate
the claim about the American College of
Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and Just
Facts could find no such information on
their website.
"The final regulation, which will be
published in the Federal Register on
Wednesday, October 2, allows states to file
a state plan amendment to use existing SCHIP
funding for coverage for children from
conception to birth and up to age 19."
NOTE: As the quote above explains, the
regulation is applicable from the point of
conception onwards, yet the following three
articles use the word "fetus" to describe
the beneficiaries.
a) Article: "HHS Proposes Insurance for
Fetuses; Opponents Call It a Ploy to Pave
Way for Ban on Abortion." By Alan Cooperman
& Amy Goldstein. Washington Post, February
1, 2002. Page A-01.
b) Article: " 'Unborn child' coverage moves
ahead: Abortion rights advocates oppose the
new regulation." By Catherine Berger. CNN,
September 27, 2002.
http://archives.cnn.com/...
"The regulation allows states to expand
eligibility to cover a fetus under the State
Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP)
without having to receive a waiver from
HHS."
[15] Book: English for Journalists. By Wynford Hicks. Second edition. Routledge,
1998.
Page 73: "Jargon is specialized vocabulary,
familiar to the members of a group, trade or
profession. If you write for a newspaper or
general magazine you should try to translate
jargon into ordinary English whenever you
can. A common source of jargon is
scientific, medical, government and legal
handouts."
[16] Book: The New Oxford Guide to Writing.
By Thomas S. Kane. Oxford University Press,
1988.
Page 199: "Jargon is technical language
misused. Technical language, the precise
diction demanded by any specialized trade or
profession, is necessary when experts
communicate with one another. It becomes
jargon when it is applied outside the limits
of technical discourse."
[17] Book: The New York Public Library
Writer's Guide to Style and Usage. Edited by
Andrea J. Sutcliffe. Stonesong Press/Harper
Collins, 1994.
Page 586: "When writing for a specialized
audienceone familiar with the topic or
fielda writer must use jargon; it is the
common idiom. When writing for a lay
audience or the general public, a writer
should use jargon only when necessary and
define it carefully. Where plain English
serves equally well, it should be used
instead."
[18]Dorland's Illustrated Medical
Dictionary. W.B. Saunders Company, 2000.
29th edition.
Page 770: "gravida a pregnant woman"
[19] For example, the following searches
were performed on July 9, 2008:
* Gravida is the title of a publication of
the Westchester Women's Poetry Collective.
The website of ABC News does not have
"AND" search capability, and so the search
was performed through Google Advanced
Search.
The article is not written in English.
[20] Article: "Parents of slain pregnant
woman forgive suspect." By Dan Nephin.
Associated Press. July 25, 2008.
http://news.yahoo.com
"The parents of a slain pregnant woman said
Friday they have forgiven the suspect
charged with killing their daughter and
cutting her baby out of the womb."
[21] Article: "Passenger Shot, Her Fetus
Dies As Men Clash On T." By Michael S.
Rosenwald. Boston Globe, February 6, 2003.
http://www.boston.com/
NOTE: In February 2003, the Boston Globe
published an article about a pregnant woman
who was shot on a subway in the abdomen,
entitling it: "Passenger shot, her fetus
dies as men clash on T." Readers of the
Globe sent letters objecting to the use of
the word "fetus" in this context because
they felt the clinical language was
dehumanizing. The paper's ombudsman
responded, stating that the Boston Globe was
"technically correct and wrong at the same
time."
"Dozens of strangers converged from all
directions to lift a 5-ton bus off the body
of a pregnant woman a heroic effort that
managed to save the life of her child but
was too late for her."
[23] Book: Writing for Journalists. By Wynford Hicks, Sally Adams & Harriet
Gilbert. Routledge, 1999. Page 125:
"This emphasis on plainness and simplicity
has been repeated by those who lay down the
law about journalistic style. The Economist
Pocket Style Book, first published in the
1980s, quotes George Orwell's 'six
elementary rules' from his famous essay,
'Politics and the English Language', written
in 1946. 5. Never use a foreign phrase, a
scientific word or a jargon word if you can
think of an everyday English equivalent."
[24] Textbook: Before We Are Born:
Essentials of Embryology and Birth Defects.
By Keith L. Moore & T.V.N. Persaud. W.B.
Saunders Company, 1998. Fifth edition. Page
500.
[25] Textbook: Human Life Before Birth. By
Frank J. Dye. Harwood Academic Publishers,
2000.
[26] Textbook: Pediatric Toxicology:
Diagnosis and Management of the Poisoned
Child. By Timothy B. Erickson, William R.
Ahrens, Steven E. Aks, Carl R. Baum, Louis
J. Ling. McGraw-Hill, 2005.
Page 46: "The categories of human in utero
exposure consist of maternal drugs of abuse,
maternal environmental exposure, and
maternal prescription drug use."
[27] Textbook: Review of Medical Physiology.
By William F. Ganong. 22nd edition. McGraw
Hill, 2005.
Page 259: "Exposure of human females to
androgen in utero does not change the cyclic
pattern ."
[28] Entry: "abortion."
American Heritage
Dictionary of Science. Edited by Robert K.
Barnhart. Houghton Mifflin, 1986.
Page 2: "a birth that occurs before the
embryo or fetus develops enough to live on
its own, usually during the first twelve
weeks of pregnancy (spontaneous abortion) SYN: miscarriage."
[29] Textbook: Before We Are Born:
Essentials of Embryology and Birth Defects.
By Keith L. Moore & T.V.N. Persaud. W.B.
Saunders Company, 1998. Fifth edition.
Page 109: "The expected date of delivery
(EDD) of a fetus is 266 days, or 38 weeks,
after fertilization; that is, 280 days, or
40 weeks, after LNMP (Table 7-1)."
[30] Book: Color Atlas of Life Before Birth.
By Marjorie A. England. Year Book Medical
Publishers, 1983.
Page 12: "Most clinicians do not know the
fertilization date; the only date available
to them is the first day of the last
menstrual period. They use this date to
define a menstrual age stretching from time
0, which is usually 14 days before
fertilization ."
[31] Book: How Life Begins. By Christopher
Vaughn. Random House 1996.
Page 8: "In other words, most obstetricians
figures are based on a forty-week pregnancy
when you're actually pregnant for only
thirty-eight weeks."
[32] Book: Color Atlas of Physiology. By
Agamemnon Despopoulos & Stefan Silbernagl.
Fifth edition. Thieme, 2003.
Page 308: "Fertilization usually takes place
on the first day after intercourse...."
[33] Textbook: Langman's Medical Embryology.
By T. W. Sadler. Ninth edition. Lippincott
Williams & Wilkins, 2004.
Page 122: "The oocyte is normally fertilized
within 12 hours of ovulation. However, sperm
deposited in the reproductive tract up to 6
days prior to ovulation can survive to
fertilize oocytes. Thus, most pregnancies
occur when sexual intercourse occurs within
a 6-day period that ends on the day of
ovulation."
[34] Book: Psychological Development and
Early Childhood. By John Oates, Clare Wood &
Andrew Grayson. Blackwell, 2005.
Page 217 states that a "genotype" is: "The
complete set of genes present in an
individual. The genotype is determined at
fertilization when genetic information from
the egg and sperm is combined."
[35] Book: Mayo Clinic Guide to a Healthy
Pregnancy. By the Mayo Clinic. Collins,
2004.
Page 45 (section on fertilization): "This
genetic material will determine your baby's
sex, eye color, hair color, body size,
facial features and at least to some
extent intelligence and personality.
Your baby's sex is determined at the moment
he or she is conceived."
[36] Book: Genetic Destinies. By Peter
Little. Oxford University Press, 2002.
Page 34: "Identical twins have exactly the
same DNA and it so follows that any feature
that is defined by gene differences should
be identical between them."
[37] Note that even though identical twins
have the same genes, they vary in certain
biological respects because of epigenetic
differences. This is explained in the paper:
"The marks, mechanisms and memory of
epigenetic states in mammals." By Vardhman
K. Rakyan & others. Biochemical Journal, May
15, 2001.
http://www.biochemj.org/bj/356/0001/3560001.pdf
Page 1: "These modifications interfere with
the DNAprotein interactions that facilitate
transcription, resulting in transcriptional
silencing of the epigenetically modified
allele. Epigenetic modifications can,
therefore, cause phenotypic variation in the
absence of genetic differences."
[38] Teaching guide: "Human Genetic
Variation." By BSCS and Videodiscovery under
a contract from the National Institutes of
Health, National Human Genome Research
Institute, 1999.
http://science.education.nih.gov/...
Page 7: "The human genome comprises about 3
Χ 109 base pairs of DNA, and the extent of
human genetic variation is such that no two
humans, save identical twins, ever have been
or will be genetically identical."
[39] Calculation performed with information
and data from the following sources:
a) Book: The Developing Human: Clinically
Orientated Embryology. By Keith L. Moore &
T. V. N. Persaud. Seventh edition. Saunders,
2003. Page 16: Human development begins at
fertilization when a male gamete or sperm
(spermatozoa) unites with a female gamete or oocyte (ovum) to form a singe cell a
zygote." Page 33: The zygote is genetically
unique because half of its chromosomes come
from the mother and half from the father.
The zygote contains a new combination of
chromosomes that is different from that in
the cells of either of the parents. This
mechanism forms the basis of biparental
inheritance and variation of the human
species."
b) Book: Population and Evolutionary
Genetics: A Primer. By Francisco J. Ayala.
Benjamin Cummings Publishing Company, 1982.
Page 53: "Considerable genetic variation
exists in most natural populations.
Consider humans with a 6.7% heterozygosity
detectable by electrophoresis. If we assume
there are 30,000 structural gene loci in a
human being, which may be an underestimate,
a person will be heterozygous at 30,000 X
0.067 = 2010 loci. Such an individual can
theoretically produce 22010 ≈ 10605
different kinds of gametes [reproductive
cells]."
c) Book: Human Reproductive Biology. By
Richard E. Jones & Kristen H. Lopez. Third
edition. Academic Press, 2006. Page 46
states that women living in developed
countries experience about 450 ovulation
cycles in a lifetime.
CALCULATION: 10605 possible genetically
unique reproductive cells per woman / 450
ovulation cycles = 2.2X10602. This figure
only accounts for the genetic variation of
the female. Therefore, the odds against a
woman conceiving the same preborn human
twice (with or without the same mate) are
actually much higher than this.
[40] Determined with data from the following
sources:
a) Textbook: Foundations of Modern
Cosmology. By John F. Hawley & Katherine A.
Holcomb. Oxford University Press, 1998. Page
454: "There are perhaps 1080 baryons in our
visible universe, and about 109 photons per
baryon."
b) Book: The Inflationary Universe. By Alan Guth. Helix Books, 1997. Page 108: "Since we
believe that the observed universe has a
baryon number of 1078, the conservation of
baryon number would imply that it always had
a baryon number of 1078."
c) Book: Six Easy Pieces: Essentials of
Physics Explained By Its Most Brilliant
Teacher. Addison-Wesley, 1995. This book is
comprised of six chapters taken from the
book Lectures on Physics by Richard Feynman.
Page 85: "There are a number of strange
particles, a neutron and a proton are
examples, which are called baryons."
d) Article: "Atom." World Book Encyclopedia,
2007 Deluxe Edition. "Tiny as atoms are,
they consist of even more minute particles.
The three basic types are protons, neutrons,
and electrons. Each atom has a definite
number of these subatomic particles."
NOTE: As shown above, all atoms contain at
least one baryon, and thus 1080 represents a
rough maximum for the number of atoms in the
visible universe.
[41] Book: The First Nine Months of Life. By
Geraldine Lux Flanagan. Simon & Shuster,
1962. Second edition.
Page 35 states that in the third week, "the
brain has two lobes," and "the early spinal
cord is bordered by the future vertebrae and
muscle segments." A picture shows the brain
lobes and spinal cord.
[42] Book: Gray's Anatomy: The Anatomical
Basis of Medicine and Surgery. Churchill
Livingstone, 1995.
Page 329 states that at 19-21 days, "The
cranial half of the groove, representing
developing brain, begins to develop cephalic
flexure, optic primordia become visible...."
[43] College textbook: Biology:
Investigating Life on Earth. By Vernon L.
Avila. Second edition. Jones and Bartlett,
1995.
Page 693: "First, the embryo has its own
circulatory system, complete with a heart
that started beating only 24 days after
conception...."
[44] Book: Gray's Anatomy: The Anatomical
Basis of Medicine and Surgery. Churchill
Livingstone, 1995.
Page 329 states that at 21-27 days, "primary
cerebral vesicles appear. Rudimentary limb
buds appear and the heart tubes fuse into a
common loop in which contractile activity
commences. The primordia of the thyroid
gland, lungs, liver, pancreas, and
mesonephric tubules are all identifiable."
[45] Book: The First Nine Months of Life. By
Geraldine Lux Flanagan. Simon & Shuster,
1962. Second edition. Pages 52-53:
"In the sixth and seventh weeks, nerves and
muscles work together for the first time. If
the area of the lips, the first to become
sensitive to touch, is gently stroked, the
baby, who then is still an embryo, responds
by bending the upper body to one side and
making a quick backward motion with the
arms. This is called a "total pattern"
response because it involves most of the
body rather than the approximate local
part."
NOTE: The details above are documented by
photos. Page 52 notes, "All of the
photographs in this book that show the
movement of the baby are taken from" films
made by Davenport Hooker at the University
of Pittsburgh.
[46] Book: Gray's Anatomy: The Anatomical
Basis of Medicine and Surgery. Churchill
Livingstone, 1995.
Page 329 states that in the 6th and 7th
weeks, "The pontine flexure, cerebral
hemispheres and cerebellum are developing."
[47] Seven weeks after fertilization.
Intrauterine picture taken under the
direction of Professor Andrzej Skawina of
Collegium Medicum Jagiellonian University
(Krakow, Poland) and Antoni Marsinek of the
Czerwiakowski Gynecological and Obstetrics
Hospital (Krakow, Poland); Photographers:
Andrzej Zachwieja and Jan Walczewski.
Copyright: Life Issues.
NOTE: A number of different photographers
have published intrauterine photos. I asked
several such individuals if I could
reproduce their pictures, and Life Issues
was the only one that gave permission. The
pictures from Life Issues look similar to
those taken by the other photographers.
[48] Book: Gray's Anatomy: The Anatomical
Basis of Medicine and Surgery. Churchill
Livingstone, 1995.
Page 95: "When mammalian embryos reach a
certain size, growth rather than
morphogenesis occurs. The embryo is referred
to as a fetus; this occurs at 56-57
postovulatory days in humans when the onset
of bone marrow formation in the humerus can
be seen (Streeter 1949); at this stage more
than 90% of the named structures of the
adult body have appeared."
[49] Book: The First Nine Months of Life. By
Geraldine Lux Flanagan. Simon & Shuster,
1962. Second edition.
Page 48: "The appearance of the first bone
cells marks the end of the embryonic period.
This criterion was chosen by embryologists
because the beginning bone formation
coincides with the essential completion of
the body."
[50] Book: The First Nine Months of Life. By
Geraldine Lux Flanagan. Simon & Shuster,
1962. Second edition.
Pages 52-53: "By the beginning of this third
month the baby moves spontaneously, without
being touched, for the first time."
[51] Article: "Fetus." By Frank D. Allan in
the Encyclopedia of Human Biology. Academic
Press, 1997. Volume 3.
Page 955 states that in the tenth week,
"Division of the heart into chambers is
complete, and a definitive vascular system
carries blood to and from all parts of the
body. All components of the brain and
spinal cord are formed, and nerves link the
stem of the brain and the spinal cord to all
tissues and organs of the body."
[52] Book: The First Nine Months of Life. By
Geraldine Lux Flanagan. Simon & Shuster,
1962. Second edition.
Pages 53-54: "In the ninth and tenth weeks,
if the baby's forehead is touched, he may
turn his head away and pucker up his brow
and frown. [T]he entire body becomes
sensitive to touch with a notable exception:
the sides, back and top of the head."
[53] Eleven weeks after fertilization.
Intrauterine picture taken under the
direction of Professor Andrzej Skawina of
Collegium Medicum Jagiellonian University
(Krakow, Poland) and Antoni Marsinek of the
Czerwiakowski Gynecological and Obstetrics
Hospital (Krakow, Poland); Photographers:
Andrzej Zachwieja and Jan Walczewski.
Copyright: Life Issues.
NOTE: A number of different photographers
have published intrauterine photos. I asked
several such individuals if I could
reproduce their pictures, and Life Issues
was the only one that gave permission. The
pictures from Life Issues look similar to
those taken by the other photographers.
[54] Article: "Fetus." By Frank D. Allan in
the Encyclopedia of Human Biology. Academic
Press, 1997. Volume 3.
Page 962 states that in the third month,
"Electrical activity of the nervous system
is discernible.... Attempts to suckle have
been seen in utero and in aborted fetuses of
3 months."
[55] Textbook: Human Genetics: Concepts and
Applications. By Ricki Lewis. Third edition.
McGraw Hill, 1998.
Page 56: "By week 12, the fetus sucks its
thumb, kicks, makes fists and faces, and has
the beginnings of baby teeth."
[56] Ultrasound taken on November 25, 1997.
Gestational age (GA) is 14 weeks and 4 days
counted from the LMP. This falls under the
category of 15 weeks after LMP and 13 weeks
after fertilization.
[57] Textbook: Before We Are Born:
Essentials of Embryology and Birth Defects.
By Keith L. Moore & T.V.N. Persaud. W.B.
Saunders Company, 1998. Fifth edition.
Page 106: "Limb movements, which occur at
the end of the embryonic period (8 weeks),
become coordinated by the 14th week, but are
too slight to be felt by the mother."
[58] Book: Embryology: Board Review Series.
By Ronald W. Dudek & James D. Fix. Second
edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins,
1998.
Page 246 states that in weeks 13-16, "Eye
movements begin."
[59] Sixteen weeks after fertilization.
Intrauterine picture taken under the
direction of Professor Andrzej Skawina of
Collegium Medicum Jagiellonian University
(Krakow, Poland) and Antoni Marsinek of the
Czerwiakowski Gynecological and Obstetrics
Hospital (Krakow, Poland); Photographers:
Andrzej Zachwieja and Jan Walczewski.
Copyright: Life Issues.
NOTE: A number of different photographers
have published intrauterine photos. I asked
several such individuals if I could
reproduce their pictures, and Life Issues
was the only one that gave permission. The
pictures from Life Issues look similar to
those taken by the other photographers.
[60] Paper: "Pain and its Effects in the
Human Neonate and Fetus." By K.J.S. Anand &
P.R. Hickey. New England Journal of
Medicine, November 19, 1987.
Page 1322 states that "by 20 weeks each
cortex has a full complement of 109
neurons."
NOTE: This article uses the obstetric method
of counting from the last menstrual period
as evidenced by the chart on page 1322,
which uses a gestation of 40 weeks for
pregnancy. Two weeks must be subtracted to
provide the actual time since fertilization.
[61] Article: "Brain."
New Millennium
Encyclopedia. Simon and Shuster, 1999.
"The cerebrum is the largest part of the
human brain, making up approximately 85
percent of the brain's weight; its large
surface area (cortex) and intricate
development account for the superior
intelligence of humans, compared with other
animals. A large part of the human cortex,
the frontal area, is used for awareness,
intelligence, and memory."
[62] Ultrasound taken on December 24, 1997.
Gestational age (GA) is 19 weeks and 4 days
counted from the last menstrual period. This
falls under the category of 20 weeks after
LMP and 18 weeks after fertilization.
[63] Article: "Fetus."
American Medical
Association Complete Medical Encyclopedia.
Edited by Jerrold B. Leikin & Martin S.
Lipsky. Random House, 2003.
Page 558: "At 20 weeks, the fetus now
sleeps and wakes and hears sounds."
[64] Twenty weeks after fertilization.
Intrauterine picture taken under the
direction of Professor Andrzej Skawina of
Collegium Medicum Jagiellonian University
(Krakow, Poland) and Antoni Marsinek of the
Czerwiakowski Gynecological and Obstetrics
Hospital (Krakow, Poland); Photographers:
Andrzej Zachwieja and Jan Walczewski.
Copyright: Life Issues.
NOTE: A number of different photographers
have published intrauterine photos. I asked
several such individuals if I could
reproduce their pictures, and Life Issues
was the only one that gave permission. The
pictures from Life Issues look similar to
those taken by the other photographers.
[65] Ultrasound taken on May 31, 1999.
Gestational age (GA) is 21 weeks and 5 days
counted from the last menstrual period. This
falls under the category of 22 weeks after
LMP and 20 weeks after fertilization.
[66] Book: Embryology: Board Review Series.
By Ronald W. Dudek & James D. Fix. Second
edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins,
1998.
Page 247 states that in weeks 21-24:
"Blink-startle reflex is demonstrable on
vibroacoustic stimulation of mother's
abdomen."
[67] Entry: "Fetus."
Encyclopedia of Human
Biology. Academic Press, 1997. Volume 3. By
Frank D. Allan.
Page 962: "Taste buds are functional at 6
months, and the modality for sweetness is
well differentiated. Increased "drinking" of
the amniotic fluid is effected when sweet
substances are introduced."
[68] Book: The First Nine Months of Life. By
Geraldine Lux Flanagan. Simon & Shuster,
1962. Second edition.
Page 71: "In the fifth and sixth months the
grip becomes strong. This baby is holding a
rod and moves his arm up and down as the rod
is moved."
NOTE: The statement above is documented with
a photo.
Page 52: "All of the photographs in this
book that show the movement of the baby are
taken from" films made by Davenport Hooker
at the University of Pittsburgh.
[69] Paper: "Very Low Birth Weight Outcomes
of the National Institute of Child Health
and Human Development Neonatal Research
Network, January 1995 Through December
1996." By James A. Lemons et al., including
Avroy A. Fanaroff. Pediatrics, January 2001.
http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/107/1/e1
NOTE:
Figure 3 is a bar graph of "Mortality before
discharge by gestational age as estimated by
best obstetrical estimate...." The term
"obstetrical estimate" implies that the
weeks are counted from LMP. To confirm, I
wrote Dr. Fanaroff, and he replied: "We do
not try to get to the issue of day of
conception hence when we refer to
gestational age we are always going back to
the Last Menstrual Period." The graph
indicates that the mortality rate at a
gestational age (LMP) of 26 weeks is less
than 20%. Hence, the survival rate at 24
weeks after fertilization is more than 80%.
[70] Paper: "Fetal homologue of infant
crying." By J L Gingras and others. Archives
of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal
Edition, April 27, 2005. Pages F415-F418.
http://adc.bmj.com/
Page F415: "[I]n a stable state (quiet or
active sleep), the fetus was challenged with
[vibroacoustic stimulation]. [This] was
provided by an artificial larynx (model 5c;
Western Electric) that emits fundamental
tones of about 100 Hz and 95 dB and was
mechanically altered to provide exactly 0.5
second of stimulation. The physiological
intrauterine noise intensity has been
reported to be about 85 dB.5"
Page F418: "The behaviors were seen in all
gestational ages studied, indicating that
the behavior occurs as early as 28 weeks
gestation, and possibly earlier."
[72] Paper: "Pain and its Effects in the
Human Neonate and Fetus." By K.J.S. Anand &
P.R. Hickey. New England Journal of
Medicine, November 19, 1987. Page 1325:
Most recently the motor responses of 124
healthy full-term neonates to a pinprick in
the leg were reported to be flexion and
adduction of the upper and lower limbs
associated with grimacing, crying, or both,
and these responses were subsequently
quantified. Similar responses have also been
documented in very premature neonates, and
in a recent study, Fitzgerald et al. found
that premature neonates (<30 weeks) not only
had lower thresholds for a flexor response
but also had increased sensitization after
repeated stimulation.
Page 1325: "In other studies of the cry
response to painful procedures, neonates
were found to be more sensitive to pain than
older infants (those 3 to 12 months
old)...."
NOTE: This article uses the obstetric method
of counting from the last menstrual period,
as evidenced by the chart on page 1322,
which uses a gestation of 40 weeks for
pregnancy. Two weeks must be subtracted to
provide the actual time since fertilization.
[73] Paper: "Symptom Management: Acute Pain,
Chapter 3 - Pain in Preverbal Children."
United States National Institutes of Health,
Publication Number 94-2421. June 1994.
http://www.nih.gov/
Page 2 cites one possible reason why younger
humans are more sensitive to pain:
"Serotonin (5HT) is a biogenic amine
transmitter that serves an important role in
pain modulation. Serotonin levels in the
young infants are low and may limit the
effectiveness of the endogenous pain control
mechanisms (Fitzgerald 1991b)."
[74] Paper: "Very Low Birth Weight Outcomes
of the National Institute of Child Health
and Human Development Neonatal Research
Network, January 1995 Through December
1996." By James A. Lemons et al., including
Avroy A. Fanaroff. Pediatrics, January 2001.
http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/107/1/e1
NOTE:
Figure 3 is a bar graph of "Mortality before
discharge by gestational age as estimated by
best obstetrical estimate...." The term
"obstetrical estimate" implies that the
weeks are counted from LMP. To confirm, I
wrote Dr. Fanaroff, and he replied: "We do
not try to get to the issue of day of
conception hence when we refer to
gestational age we are always going back to
the Last Menstrual Period." The graph
indicates that the mortality rate at a
gestational age (LMP) of 30 weeks is a
little less than 5%. Hence, the survival
rate at 28 weeks after fertilization is more
than 95%.
[75] Textbook: Before We Are Born:
Essentials of Embryology and Birth Defects.
By Keith L. Moore & T.V.N. Persaud. W.B.
Saunders Company, 1998. Fifth edition.
Page 109: "The expected date of delivery
(EDD) of a fetus is 266 days, or 38 weeks,
after fertilization; that is, 280 days, or
40 weeks, after LNMP (Table 7-1)."
[76] Entry: "neonate."
Dorland's Illustrated
Medical Dictionary. 29th edition. W. B.
Saunders Company, 2000. Page 1184: "a
newborn infant."
The Democratic Party strongly and
unequivocally supports Roe v. Wade and a
woman's right to choose a safe and legal
abortion, regardless of ability to pay, and
we oppose any and all efforts to weaken or
undermine that right.
The Democratic Party also strongly supports
access to comprehensive affordable family
planning services and age-appropriate sex
education which empower people to make
informed choices and live healthy lives. We
also recognize that such health care and
education help reduce the number of
unintended pregnancies and thereby also
reduce the need for abortions.
The Democratic Party also strongly supports
a woman's decision to have a child by
ensuring access to and availability of
programs for pre- and post-natal health
care, parenting skills, income support, and
caring adoption programs.
[79] Search performed on May 27, 2008 at
http://thomas.loc.gov/. Bill texts from the
101st to 110th Congresses searched for
"amendment to the Constitution of the United
States with respect to the right to life."
Sample result:
H. J. RES. 23
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution
of the United States with respect to the
right to life.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 4, 1995
Mr. VOLKMER [Harold L. Volkmer (Democrat
Missouri)] introduced the following joint
resolution; which was referred to the
Committee on the Judiciary
JOINT RESOLUTION
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution
of the United States with respect to the
right to life.
Resolved by the Senate and House of
Representatives of the United States of
America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of
each House concurring therein), That the
following article is proposed as an
amendment to the Constitution of the United
States, which shall be valid to all intents
and purposes as part of the Constitution
when ratified by the legislatures of
three-fourths of the several States:
Article
SECTION 1. With respect to the right to
life, the word `person' as used in this
article and in the fifth and fourteenth
articles of amendment to the Constitution of
the United States applies to all human
beings irrespective of age, health,
function, or condition of dependency,
including their unborn offspring at every
state of their biological development.
SECTION 2. No unborn person shall be
deprived of life by any person: Provided,
however, That nothing in this article shall
prohibit a law permitting only those medical
procedures required to prevent the death of
the mother.
SECTION 3. The Congress and the several
States shall have the power to enforce this
article by appropriate legislation.
SECTION 4. This article shall be inoperative
unless it shall have been ratified as an
amendment to the Constitution by the
legislatures of three-fourths of the several
States, within ten years of the date of its
submission to the States by the Congress.
[80] Search performed on May 27, 2008 at
http://thomas.loc.gov/. Bill texts from the
101st to 110th Congresses searched for
"amendment to the Constitution of the United
States with respect to the right to life."
Sample result:
H. J. RES. 9
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution
of the United States with respect to the
right to life.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 7, 2003
Mrs. EMERSON [Jo Ann Emerson (Republican
-Missouri)] introduced the following joint
resolution; which was referred to the
Committee on the Judiciary
JOINT RESOLUTION
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution
of the United States with respect to the
right to life.
Resolved by the Senate and House of
Representatives of the United States of
America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of
each House concurring therein), That the
following article is proposed as an
amendment to the Constitution of the United
States, which shall be valid only when
ratified by the legislatures of
three-fourths of the several States within
seven years after the date of final passage
of this joint resolution:
Article
SECTION 1. With respect to the right to
life, the word `person' as used in this
article and in the fifth and fourteenth
articles of amendment applies to all human
beings irrespective of age, health,
function, or condition of dependency,
including their unborn offspring at every
state of their biological development.
SECTION 2. No unborn person shall be
deprived of life by any person: Provided,
however, That nothing in this article shall
prohibit a law permitting only those medical
procedures required to prevent the death of
the mother of an unborn person: Provided
further, That nothing in this article shall
limit the liberty of a mother with respect
to the unborn offspring of the mother
conceived as a result of rape or incest.
SECTION 3. The Congress and the several
States shall have power to enforce this
article by appropriate legislation.
National Right to Life is proud and honored
to endorse Governor Mitt Romney for
President of the United States.
On pro-life issues, Mitt Romney and Barack
Obama provide a stark contrast. As the
country's most pro-abortion president,
Barack Obama has pursued a radical
pro-abortion agenda. It is now time for
pro-life Americans to unite behind Mitt
Romney. For the sake of unborn children, the
disabled, and the elderly, we must win.
Let's review President Obama's abysmal
record on life.
[82] Press release: "NARAL Pro-Choice
America PAC Endorses President Obama For
Re-election." NARAL Pro-Choice America, May
15, 2012.
http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/...
Nancy Keenan, president of NARAL Pro-Choice
America, released the following statement
today, announcing that her organization's
political action committee has endorsed
President Barack Obama for re-election.
NARAL Pro-Choice America is committed to the
re-election of President Obama because a
Mitt Romney victory in November would be
disastrous for women. Romney's attacks on
women's health include vetoing legislation
as Governor of Massachusetts that would
ensure timely access to emergency
contraception for survivors of rape and
vowing to defund family health centers.
Romney has even said he thinks Roe v. Wade
and the Affordable Care Act should be
overturnedtwo of the most critical advances
in women's health in generations.
Moderator: "Senator, do you personally
believe that life begins at conception, and
if not, when does it begin?"
Obama: "You know, I, I, um this is
something that I have not, ah, I think come
to a firm resolution on. Ah, I think it's
very hard to know what that means, when life
begins. Is it when a cell separates? Is it
when, ah, the soul stirs? Ah, so I don't
presume to, to know the answer to that
question. Ah, what I know, ah, as I've said
before, is, is that, ah, there is something
extraordinarily powerful about potential
life and that, ah, that has a moral weight
to it that, ah, we take into consideration
when we're having these debates. "
[84] Article: "Barack Obama, John McCain
discuss faith, issues at Saddleback Church
forum." By Maeve Reston and Seema Mehta.
Los
Angeles Times, August 17, 2008.
http://www.latimes.com/...
Thirty-five years after the Supreme Court
decided Roe v. Wade, it's never been more
important to protect a woman's right to
choose. Last year, the Supreme Court decided
by a vote of 5-4 to uphold the Federal
Abortion Ban, and in doing so undermined an
important principle of Roe v. Wade: that we
must always protect women's health. With one
more vacancy on the Supreme Court, we could
be looking at a majority hostile to a
women's fundamental right to choose for the
first time since Roe v. Wade. The next
president may be asked to nominate that
Supreme Court justice. That is what is at
stake in this election.
This anniversary reminds us that it's not
enough to protect the gains of the past we
have to build a future that's filled with
hope and possibility for all Americans.
"I have worked on these issues for decades
now. I put Roe at the center of my lesson
plan on reproductive freedom when I taught
Constitutional Law. On this fundamental
issue, I will not yield and Planned
Parenthood will not yield."
"When I'm President, I will appoint judges
to our courts who understand that Roe v.
Wade isn't just binding legal precedent, it
is the touchstone of our reproductive
freedom, the embodiment of our most
fundamental rights, and no one - no judge,
no governor, no Senator, no President - has
the right to take it away."
Ultimately, women are in the best position
to make a decision at the end of the day
about these issues. With significant
constraints. For example, I think we can
legitimately say the state can
legitimately say that we are prohibiting
late-term abortions as long as there's an
exception for the mother's health. Those
provisions that I voted against typically
didn't have those exceptions, which raises
profound questions where you might have a
mother at great risk.
[91] Ruling: Roe v. Wade. U.S. Supreme
Court, January 22, 1973. Case 410 U.S. 113.
Decided 7-2. Majority: Blackmun, Burger,
Brennan, Douglas, Stewart, Marshall, Powell.
Concurring: Burger, Douglas, Stewart.
Dissenting: White, Rehnquist.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/...
Section XI:
For the stage subsequent to viability the
State, in promoting its interest in the
potentiality of human life, may, if it
chooses, regulate, and even proscribe,
abortion except where necessary, in
appropriate medical judgment, for the
preservation of the life or health of the
mother.
Section VIII:
Specific and direct harm medically
diagnosable even in early pregnancy may be
involved. Maternity, or additional
offspring, may force upon the woman a
distressful life and future. Psychological
harm may be imminent. Mental and physical
health may be taxed by child care. There is
also the distress, for all concerned,
associated with the unwanted child, and
there is the problem of bringing a child
into a family already unable,
psychologically and otherwise, to care for
it. In other cases, as in this one, the
additional difficulties and continuing
stigma of unwed motherhood may be involved.
All these are factors the woman and her
responsible physician necessarily will
consider in consultation.
Section XI:
In Doe v. Bolton, post, p. 179, procedural
requirements contained in one of the modern
abortion statutes are considered. That
opinion and this one, of course, are to be
read together.
[92] Ruling: Doe v. Bolton. U.S. Supreme
Court, January 22, 1973. Case 410 U.S. 179.
Decided 7-2. Majority: Blackmun, Brennan,
Stewart, Marshall, Powell. Concurring:
Burger, Douglas. Dissenting: White,
Rehnquist.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/...
Section IV:
C. the medical judgment may be exercised
in the light of all factors -- physical,
emotional, psychological, familial, and the
woman's age -- relevant to the well-being of
the patient. All these factors may relate to
health.
D. The appellants next argue that the
District Court should have declared
unconstitutional three procedural demands of
the Georgia statute: (2) that the
procedure be approved by the hospital staff
abortion committee; and (3) that the
performing physician's judgment be confirmed
by the independent examinations of the
patient by two other licensed physicians.
We conclude that the interposition of the
hospital abortion committee is unduly
restrictive of the patient's rights and
needs that, at this point, have already been
medically delineated and substantiated by
her personal physician.
There remains, however, the required
confirmation by two Georgia-licensed
physicians in addition to the recommendation
of the pregnant woman's own consultant
(making under the statute, a total of six
physicians involved, including the three on
the hospital's abortion committee). We
conclude that this provision, too, must
fall.
The statute's emphasis, as has been
repetitively noted, is on the attending
physician's "best clinical judgment that an
abortion is necessary." That should be
sufficient. The reasons for the presence of
the confirmation step in the statute are
perhaps apparent, but they are insufficient
to withstand constitutional challenge. If
a physician is licensed by the State, he is
recognized by the State as capable of
exercising acceptable clinical judgment.
If a physician is licensed by the State, he
is recognized by the State as capable of
exercising acceptable clinical judgment.
[96] Bill S.1173: "Freedom of Choice Act."
Introduced in the United States Senate,
April 19, 2007.
http://thomas.loc.gov/
"To protect, consistent with Roe v. Wade, a
woman's freedom to choose to bear a child or
terminate a pregnancy, and for other
purposes."
NOTE: Introduced by Barbara Boxer
(D-California) for herself, Patty Murray
(D-Washington), Debbie Stabenow
(D-Michigan), Jeff Bingaman (D-New Mexico),
Robert Menendez (D-New Jersey), Frank
Lautenberg (D-New Jersey), Benjamin Cardin
(D-Maryland), Chuck Schumer (D-New York),
Diane Feinstein (D-California), Hillary
Clinton (D-New York), Barbara Mikulski
(D-Maryland), Max Baucus (D-Montana), Maria
Cantwell (D-Washington).
"At the request of Mrs. BOXER, the name of
the Senator from Illinois (Mr. OBAMA) was
added as a cosponsor of S. 1173, a bill to
protect, consistent with Roe v. Wade, a
woman's freedom to choose to bear a child or
terminate a pregnancy, and for other
purposes."
[98] Bill S.1173: "Freedom of Choice Act."
Introduced in the United States Senate,
April 19, 2007.
http://thomas.loc.gov/
SEC. 4. INTERFERENCE WITH REPRODUCTIVE
HEALTH PROHIBITED.
(b) Prohibition of Interference- A
government may not-
(1) deny or interfere with a woman's right
to choose
(A) to bear a child;
(B) to terminate a pregnancy prior to
viability; or
(C) to terminate a pregnancy after viability
where termination is necessary to protect
the life or health of the woman; or
(2) discriminate against the exercise of the
rights set forth in paragraph (1) in the
regulation or provision of benefits,
facilities, services, or information.
SEC. 6. RETROACTIVE EFFECT.
This Act applies to every Federal, State,
and local statute, ordinance, regulation,
administrative order, decision, policy,
practice, or other action enacted, adopted,
or implemented before, on, or after the date
of enactment of this Act.
[99] House Resolution 1964 IH: "Freedom of
Choice Act." Introduced in U.S. House of
Representatives, April 19, 2007.
http://thomas.loc.gov/
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
(9) Further threatening Roe, the Supreme
Court recently upheld the first-ever Federal
ban on abortion, which has no exception to
protect a woman's health. The majority
decision in Gonzales v. Carhart and
Gonzales
v. Planned Parenthood Federation of America
permits the government to interfere with a
woman's right to choose to terminate a
pregnancy and effectively overturns a core
tenet of Roe v. Wade by abandoning more than
30 years of protection for women's health.
SEC. 4. INTERFERENCE WITH REPRODUCTIVE
HEALTH PROHIBITED.
(a) Statement of Policy- It is the policy of
the United States that every woman has the
fundamental right to choose to bear a child,
to terminate a pregnancy prior to fetal
viability, or to terminate a pregnancy after
fetal viability when necessary to protect
the life or health of the woman.
(b) Prohibition of Interference- A
government may not
(1) deny or interfere with a woman's right
to choose
(A) to bear a child;
(B) to terminate a pregnancy prior to
viability; or
(C) to terminate a pregnancy after viability
where termination is necessary to protect
the life or health of the woman; or
(2) discriminate against the exercise of the
rights set forth in paragraph (1) in the
regulation or provision of benefits,
facilities, services, or information.
SEC. 6. RETROACTIVE EFFECT.
This Act applies to every Federal, State,
and local statute, ordinance, regulation,
administrative order, decision, policy,
practice, or other action enacted, adopted,
or implemented before, on, or after the date
of enactment of this Act.
NOTE: Introduced by Jerrold Nadler (New
York), 56 other Democrats, and one
Republican who has since withdrawn his
sponsorship.
[100] Web page: "Cosponsors: H.R. 1964 -
Freedom of Choice Act (House of
Representatives)." U.S. Library of Congress.
Accessed June 28, 2012 at
http://thomas.loc.gov/
NOTE: The bill was sponsored by Jerrold
Nadler and originally gained 109 cosponsors,
but one of these (Republican Jon C. Porter
of Nevada) withdrew 4 days later. The party
of each sponsor is identified in the next
note. The only Republican among them is
Christopher Shays of Connecticut.
[102] Web page: "Bill Summary & Status, All
Congressional Actions, S.1173: Freedom of
Choice Act." Library of Congress. Accessed
June 28, 2012 at
http://thomas.loc.gov/
"ALL ACTIONS: 4/19/2007: Referred to the
House Committee on the Judiciary. 5/4/2007:
Referred to the Subcommittee on the
Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil
Liberties."
[103] Web page: "Cosponsors: S.1173: Freedom
of Choice Act (Senate)." U.S. Library of
Congress. Accessed June 28, 2012 at
http://thomas.loc.gov/
Sponsor: Sen Boxer, Barbara (CA)
Cosponsors (19) Max Baucus, Max (MT), Jeff
Bingaman (NM), Sherrod Brown (OH), Maria
Cantwell (WA), Benjamin Cardin (MD), Hillary
Clinton (NY), Diane Feinstein (CA), John
Kerry (MA), Frank Lautenberg (NJ), Joseph
Lieberman (CT), Robert Menendez (NJ),
Barbara Mikulski (MD), Patty Murray (WA),
Barack Obama (IL), Bernie Sanders (VT),
Charles Schumer (NY), Debbie Stabenow (MI),
Jon Tester (MT), Sheldon Whitehouse (RI).
[104] Web page: "Bill Summary & Status, All
Congressional Actions, S.1173: Freedom of
Choice Act." Library of Congress. Accessed
June 28, 2012 at
http://thomas.loc.gov/
"ALL ACTIONS: 4/19/2007: Read twice and
referred to the Committee on the Judiciary."
[105] Article: "THE 1994 CAMPAIGN; Excerpt
From Debate By Kennedy And Romney." New York
Times, October 26, 1994.
http://www.nytimes.com/...
"On a personal basis, I don't favor
abortion," he said. "However, as governor of
the commonwealth, I will protect the right
of a woman to choose under the laws of the
country and the laws of the commonwealth."
[107] Article: "Romney vetoes law on pill,
takes aim at Roe v. Wade." By Scott S.
Greenberger. Boston Globe, July 26, 2005.
http://www.boston.com/...
Romney outlines his abortion position in an
opinion article today in The Boston Globe, a
day after he vetoed a bill that would expand
access to the so-called "morning after"
pill, a high dose of hormones that women can
take to prevent pregnancy up to five days
after sex.
The bill that Romney vetoed would allow
trained pharmacists to dispense the
morning-after pill without a prescription
and would require hospitals to offer it to
rape victims. It almost certainly will
become law despite Romney's rejection; both
the House and Senate approved it by
veto-proof margins, and legislative leaders
said they plan to override his veto.
"I have spoken with medical professionals to
determine whether the drug contemplated
under the bill would simply prevent
conception or whether it would also
terminate a living embryo after conception.
Once it became clear that the latter was the
case, my decision was straightforward."
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized
in the United States, and subject to the
jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the
United States and of the State wherein they
reside. No State shall make or enforce any
law which shall abridge the privileges or
immunities of citizens of the United States;
nor shall any State deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due
process of law; nor deny to any person
within its jurisdiction the equal protection
of the laws.
Article 2, Clause 2, Section 2: "[The
President] with the Advice and Consent of
the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other
public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the
supreme Court...."
The filibuster is widely viewed as one of
the Senate's most characteristic procedural
features. Filibustering includes any use of
dilatory or obstructive tactics to block a
measure by preventing it from coming to a
vote. The possibility of filibusters exists
because Senate rules place few limits on
Senators' rights and opportunities in the
legislative process.
Senate Rule XXII, however, known as the
"cloture rule," enables Senators to
end a filibuster on any debatable matter the
Senate is considering. Sixteen Senators
initiate this process by presenting a motion
to end the debate. The Senate does not vote
on this cloture motion until the second day
after the motion is made. Then it usually
requires the votes of at least three-fifths
of all Senators (normally 60 votes) to
invoke cloture. Invoking cloture on a
proposal to amend the Senate's standing
rules requires the support of two-thirds of
the Senators present and voting.
Page CRS-10:
Invoking cloture usually requires a
three-fifths vote of the entire
Senate"three-fifths of the Senators duly
chosen and sworn." If there are no
vacancies, therefore, 60 Senators must vote
to invoke cloture. In contrast, most other
votes require only a simple majority (that
is, 51%) of the Senators present and voting,
assuming that those Senators constitute a
quorum. In the case of a cloture vote, the
key is the number of Senators voting for
cloture, not the number voting against.
Failing to vote on a cloture motion has the
same effect as voting against the motion: it
deprives the motion of one of the 60 votes
needed to agree to it.
There is an important exception to the
three-fifths requirement to invoke cloture.
Under Rule XXII, an affirmative vote of
two-thirds of the Senators present and
voting is required to invoke cloture on a
measure or motion to amend the Senate rules.
This exception has its origin in the recent
history of the cloture rule. Before 1975,
two-thirds of the Senators present and
voting (a quorum being present) was required
for cloture on all matters. In early 1975,
at the beginning of the 94th Congress,
Senators sought to amend the rule to make it
somewhat easier to invoke cloture. However,
some Senators feared that if this effort
succeeded, that would only make it easier to
amend the rule again, making cloture still
easier to invoke. As a compromise, the
Senate agreed to move from a maximum of 67
votes (two-thirds of the Senators present
and voting) to a minimum of 60 votes
(three-fifths of the Senators duly chosen
and sworn) on all matters except future
rules changes, including changes in the
cloture rule itself.11
2. Notwithstanding the provisions of rule II
or rule IV or any other rule of the Senate,
at any time a motion signed by sixteen
Senators, to bring to a close the debate
upon any measure, motion, other matter
pending before the Senate, or the unfinished
business, is presented to the Senate, the
Presiding Officer, or clerk at the direction
of the Presiding Officer, shall at once
state the motion to the Senate, and one hour
after the Senate meets on the following
calendar day but one, he shall lay the
motion before the Senate and direct that the
clerk call the roll, and upon the
ascertainment that a quorum is present, the
Presiding Officer shall, without debate,
submit to the Senate by a yea-and-nay vote
the question:
"Is it the sense of the Senate that the
debate shall be brought to a close?" And if
that question shall be decided in the
affirmative by three-fifths of the Senators
duly chosen and sworn -- except on a measure
or motion to amend the Senate rules, in
which case the necessary affirmative vote
shall be two-thirds of the Senators present
and voting -- then said measure, motion, or
other matter pending before the Senate, or
the unfinished business, shall be the
unfinished business to the exclusion of all
other business until disposed of.
Thereafter no Senator shall be entitled to
speak in all more than one hour on the
measure, motion, or other matter pending
before the Senate, or the unfinished
business, the amendments thereto, and
motions affecting the same, and it shall be
the duty of the Presiding Officer to keep
the time of each Senator who speaks. Except
by unanimous consent, no amendment shall be
proposed after the vote to bring the debate
to a close, unless it had been submitted in
writing to the Journal Clerk by 1 o'clock
p.m. on the day following the filing of the
cloture motion if an amendment in the first
degree, and unless it had been so submitted
at least one hour prior to the beginning of
the cloture vote if an amendment in the
second degree. No dilatory motion, or
dilatory amendment, or amendment not germane
shall be in order. Points of order,
including questions of relevancy, and
appeals from the decision of the Presiding
Officer, shall be decided without debate.
After no more than thirty hours of
consideration of the measure, motion, or
other matter on which cloture has been
invoked, the Senate shall proceed, without
any further debate on any question, to vote
on the final disposition thereof to the
exclusion of all amendments not then
actually pending before the Senate at that
time and to the exclusion of all motions,
except a motion to table, or to reconsider
and one quorum call on demand to establish
the presence of a quorum (and motions
required to establish a quorum) immediately
before the final vote begins. The thirty
hours may be increased by the adoption of a
motion, decided without debate, by a
three-fifths affirmative vote of the
Senators duly chosen and sworn, and any such
time thus agreed upon shall be equally
divided between and controlled by the
Majority and Minority Leaders or their
designees. However, only one motion to
extend time, specified above, may be made in
any one calendar day.
Article III, Section 1: "The Judges, both of
the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold
their Offices during good Behaviour...."
Article II, Section 4: "The President, Vice
President and all civil Officers of the
United States, shall be removed from Office
on Impeachment for, and Conviction of,
Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and
Misdemeanors."
Article I, Section 2, Clause 5: "The House
of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker
and other Officers; and shall have the sole
Power of Impeachment."
Article I, Section 3, Clause 6: "The Senate
shall have the sole Power to try all
Impeachments. And no Person shall be
convicted without the Concurrence of two
thirds of the Members present."
NOTE: This article provided the roadmap to
the related facts detailed in the footnote
below.
[117] Article: "Rights Without Access:
Revisiting Public Funding of Abortion for
Poor Women." By Heather Boonstra and Adam
Sonfield. Guttmacher Report on Public
Policy, April 2000.
http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/tgr/03/2/gr030208.html
A 1994-1995 AGI [Alan Guttmacher Institute]
survey of abortion patients found that in
states where Medicaid pays for abortions,
women covered by Medicaid have an abortion
rate 3.9 times that of women who are not
covered, while in states that do not permit
Medicaid funding for abortions, Medicaid
recipients are only 1.6 times as likely as
nonrecipients to have abortions. In
explaining this finding, the researchers
state that while other factors also may be
at play, "the magnitude of the difference
indicates that Medicaid coverage of abortion
has an important effect on the ability of
poor women to end unwanted pregnancies."
Meanwhile, a study published by the Journal
of Health Economics in 1999 considered the
effects of interruptions in abortion funding
in North Carolina (which paid for abortion
until 1995). In five instances between 1978
and 1993, the state's abortion fund was
depleted before the end of the fiscal year.
During those times when funding was not
available, the researchers found, more than
one in three women (37%) who would have
obtained an abortion if the state had paid
for it instead carried the pregnancy to
term.
"Presently the death rate from abortion at
all stages of gestation is 0.6 per 100,000
procedures (Paul et al., 1999)."
NOTE: "Paul et al., 1999" is a secondary
source that cites the CDC. See next note.
[122] Book: A Clinician's Guide to Medical
and Surgical Abortion. By Maureen Paul &
others. Churchill Livingstone, 1999. Page
19:
"In the United States mortality [from
abortion] was (per 100,000) 2.6 during the
period 1972-1976, 0.9 in 1977-1981, 0.7 in
1982-1986, and 0.6 in 1987-1991 (based on
deaths reported by the CDC and number of
abortions from AGI)."
NOTE: This corresponds to the figure for
subsequent years quoted in the next
footnote.
[123] Document: "Abortion Surveillance Fact
Sheet." National Center for Chronic
"The case-fatality rate for known legal
induced abortion for 1993 to 1997 was 0.6
deaths per 100,000 legal abortions."
[124] Report: "Abortion Surveillance --
United States, 1996." By Lisa M. Koonin and
others. Division of Reproductive Health,
National Center for Chronic Disease
Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for
Disease Control, July 30, 1999.
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss4804a1.htm
Table 19.
NOTE: The data in this source and the
sources cited in the next note come from
different divisions of the CDC and are at
variance with one another due to
methodological dissimilarities. It was
necessary to use data from both divisions
because the data from this source only goes
back to 1972, and the sources in the next
note do not isolate legal vs. illegal
abortion-related deaths.
[125] Constructed with data from the
following sources:
a) Report: "Table 290F. Deaths For
Approximately 64 Selected Causes, By 10-Year
Age Groups, Race, And Sex: United States,
1950-59." National Center for Health
Statistics, Centers for Disease Control.
Accessed August 2008 at
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/dx1950_59.pdf
Page 169 (in pdf).
b) Report: "Table 290A. Deaths For 60
Selected Causes, By 10-Year Age Groups,
Race, And Sex: United States, 1960-67."
National Center for Health Statistics,
Centers for Disease Control. Accessed August
2008 at
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/statab/dx196067.pdf
Page 169 (in pdf).
c) Report: "Table 290A. Deaths For 69
Selected Causes, By 10-Year Age Groups,
Race, And Sex: United States, 1968-78."
National Center for Health Statistics,
Centers for Disease Control. Accessed August
2008 at
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/dx196878.pdf
Page 358 (in pdf).
d) Report: "Resident population by age,
color, and sex: United States, 1950-1959."
National Center for Health Statistics,
Centers for Disease Control. Mailed to Just
Facts from the aforementioned agency, August
7, 2008.
e) Report: "Population by age groups, race,
and sex for 1960-97." National Center for
Health Statistics, Centers for Disease
Control. Accessed August 2008 at
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/statab/pop6097.pdf
Pages 19, 21 (in pdf).
[126] Report: "Maternal Mortality
Surveillance, United States, 1980-1985." By
Lisa M. Koonin & others. Morbidity and
Mortality Weekly Report, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, December 1, 1988.
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00001754.htm
Finally, the coding system used by national
vital statistics and states to describe
maternal deaths includes a combination of
outcomes of pregnancy (e.g. ectopic
pregnancy, abortion), immediate causes of
death (e.g., hemorrhage), and underlying
obstetrical conditions that contribute to
death (e.g., obstructed labor). This system
of classification precludes a determination
of the real causes of maternal death. To
develop strategies to prevent maternal
deaths, public health personnel need to know
the immediate cause of death as well as the
underlying conditions that led to death.
[127] Constructed with data from the
following sources:
a) Report: "Table 290F. Deaths For
Approximately 64 Selected Causes, By 10-Year
Age Groups, Race, And Sex: United States,
1950-59." National Center for Health
Statistics, U.S. Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention. Accessed August 2008 at
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/dx1950_59.pdf
Page 167 (in pdf).
b) Report: "Table 290A. Deaths For 60
Selected Causes, By 10-Year Age Groups,
Race, And Sex: United States, 1960-67."
National Center for Health Statistics, U.S.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Accessed August 2008 at
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/statab/dx196067.pdf
Page 167 (in pdf).
c) Report: "Table 290A. Deaths For 69
Selected Causes, By 10-Year Age Groups,
Race, And Sex: United States, 1968-78."
National Center for Health Statistics, U.S.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Accessed August 2008 at
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/dx196878.pdf
Page 363 (in pdf).
d) Report: "Resident population by age,
color, and sex: United States, 1950-1959."
National Center for Health Statistics, U.S.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Mailed to Just Facts from the aforementioned
agency, August 7, 2008.
e) Report: "Population by age groups, race,
and sex for 1960-97." National Center for
Health Statistics, U.S. Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention. Accessed August 2008
at
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/statab/pop6097.pdf
Pages 19, 21 (in pdf).
[128] Report: "Maternal Mortality
Surveillance, United States, 1980-1985." By
Lisa M. Koonin & others. Morbidity and
Mortality Weekly Report, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, December 1, 1988.
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00001754.htm
"Death certificates alone may not provide
adequate information on the sequence of
events that led to death. Ultimately a
single code is assigned to classify the
underlying cause of death. Often, however,
several factors may contribute to a death;
therefore, the death cannot be adequately
described with a unidimensional code."
[129] Constructed with data from the
following sources:
a) Report: "Table 290F. Deaths For
Approximately 64 Selected Causes, By 10-Year
Age Groups, Race, And Sex: United States,
1950-59." National Center for Health
Statistics, U.S. Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention. Accessed August 2008 at
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/dx1950_59.pdf
Pages 1, 43, 199, 208 (in pdf).
b) Report: "Table 290A. Deaths For 60
Selected Causes, By 10-Year Age Groups,
Race, And Sex: United States, 1960-67."
National Center for Health Statistics, U.S.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Accessed August 2008 at
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/statab/dx196067.pdf
Pages 1, 40, 200, 210 (in pdf).
c) Report: "Table 290A. Deaths For 69
Selected Causes, By 10-Year Age Groups,
Race, And Sex: United States, 1968-78."
National Center for Health Statistics, U.S.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Accessed August 2008 at
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/dx196878.pdf
Pages 2, 73, 406, 422 (in pdf).
d) Report: "Resident population by age,
color, and sex: United States, 1950-1959."
National Center for Health Statistics, U.S.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Mailed to Just Facts from the aforementioned
agency, August 7, 2008.
e) Report: "Population by age groups, race,
and sex for 1960-97." National Center for
Health Statistics, U.S. Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention. Accessed August 2008
at
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/statab/pop6097.pdf
Pages 19, 21 (in pdf).
[130] "Fact Sheet: Abortion After the First
Trimester in the United States." Lead
author: John Mugge. Revised by Deborah
Golub. Planned Parenthood, 2004. Current as
of May 2007.
http://www.plannedparenthood.org/...
Page 3:
The risk of death from medication abortion
through 63 days' gestation is about one per
100,000 procedures (Grimes, 2005). The risk
of death with surgical abortion is about one
per 1,000,000 through 63 days' gestation
(Bartlett et al., 2004). The risk of death
from miscarriage is about one per 100,000
(Saraiya et al., 1999). But the risk of
death associated with childbirth is about 10
times as high as that associated with all
abortion (Christiansen & Collins, 2006).
[131] "Pregnancy-Associated Deaths: A
15-Year Retrospective Study and Overall
Review of Maternal Pathophysiology." By
Lydia R. Christiansen & Kim A. Collins.
American Journal of Forensic Medicine and
Pathology, March 2006. Pages 11-19.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16501342
Page 11:
Pregnancy-related death is defined by the
International Classification of Diseases,
Tenth Revision (ICD-10) as the death of a
woman while pregnant or within 42 days of
termination of pregnancy, irrespective of
the cause of death. In the year 2000, a
collaborative effort involving World Health
Organization (WHO), UNICEF, and UNFPA
estimated 660 maternal deaths in the United
States. This averages 11 maternal deaths per
100,000 live births reported.
Page 13: "The risk of death from
complications of pregnancy decreased
approximately 99% during the 20th century,
from approximately 850 maternal deaths per
100,000 live births in 1900 to 7.5 in
1982.4"
Page 18: "It is evident that homicides,
suicides, and accidents account for a large
proportion of pregnancy-related deaths."
NOTE: The figures from "Christiansen &
Collins, 2006" cannot be used as a
comparator for the others studies cited by
Planned Parenthood in the note above (i.e.,
Grimes, Bartlett) because these studies are
limited by gestational age and do not apply
to "all abortion."
"Presently the death rate from abortion at
all stages of gestation is 0.6 per 100,000
procedures (Paul et al., 1999). The risk of
death associated with childbirth is about 10
times as high as that associated with
abortion (AGI, 1998)."
NOTE: "Paul et al., 1999" and "AGI, 1998"
are secondary sources that cite the CDC. See
the next two footnotes.
[133] Book: A Clinician's Guide to Medical
and Surgical Abortion. By Maureen Paul &
others. Churchill Livingstone, 1999. Page
19:
"In the United States mortality [from
abortion] was (per 100,000) 2.6 during the
period 1972-1976, 0.9 in 1977-1981, 0.7 in
1982-1986, and 0.6 in 1987-1991 (based on
deaths reported by the CDC and number of
abortions from AGI)."
[134] Web page: "Facts in Brief \Induced
Abortion." Guttmacher Institute. Accessed
October 2002 at
http://www.agi-usa.org/
The risk of death associated with childbirth
is about 10 times as high as that associated
with abortion.
The data in this fact sheet are the most
current available. Most are from research
conducted by the Guttmacher Institute and/or
published in its peer-reviewed journals. An
additional source is the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention.
NOTE: The url at which this source was
previously located contains a newer version
of this web page that does not make the
claim that "risk of death associated with
childbirth is about 10 times as high as that
associated with abortion." [Web page: "Facts
on Induced Abortion in the United States."
Guttmacher Institute, July 2008.
http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/fb_induced_abortion.html]
[135] Report: "Strategies to Reduce
Pregnancy-Related Deaths: From
Identification and Review to Action." By
Cynthia Berg and others. Division of
Reproductive Health, U.S. Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, 2001.
http://www.cdc.gov/...
Page 14:
Sources of pregnancy-related deaths are
listed below in order of simplicity and
convenience:
Death certificate cause-of-death codesthe
core source for finding cases.
"We have no choice but to rely on the
methods used by each reporting area to
determine whether a death (including a death
because of homicide) is
pregnancy-associated. As stated in our
discussion, the cause of death on death
certificates is the most common way of
ascertaining pregnancy-associated deaths."
[137] Report: "Strategies to Reduce
Pregnancy-Related Deaths: From
Identification and Review to Action." By
Cynthia Berg and others. Division of
Reproductive Health, U.S. Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, 2001.
http://www.cdc.gov/...
Page 13:
Currently, no single source of information
captures all pregnancy-related deaths,
despite all deaths and essentially all live
births in the United States being registered
by Vital Statistics. Several reasons account
for this failure:
Lack of physician training in, or
knowledge about, how to fill out a death
certificate.
ICD coding rules that make the
cause-of-death code on a death certificate
fall outside the range of conditions
considered to be pregnancy-related (in
ICD-9, those codes are 630676; in ICD-10,
chapter O).
Reliance on death certificate data to
estimate cause of death.
Medical records that fail to indicate that
the events leading to death began with
pregnancy, especially if the death occurred
during the postpartum period.
Medical and autopsy records that cannot be
located or are not available for review.
[138] Report: "Maternal Mortality
Surveillance, United States, 1980-1985." By
Lisa M. Koonin & others. Morbidity and
Mortality Weekly Report, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, December 1, 1988.
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00001754.htm
We have no choice but to rely on the methods
used by each reporting area to determine
whether a death (including a death because
of homicide) is pregnancy-associated. As
stated in our discussion, the cause of death
on death certificates is the most common way
of ascertaining pregnancy-associated deaths.
Next is computerized linking of deaths among
women of reproductive age with birth
certificates and fetal death certificates;
we believe this system is used in about half
the reporting areas.
[140] Report: "Strategies to Reduce
Pregnancy-Related Deaths: From
Identification and Review to Action." By
Cynthia Berg and others. Division of
Reproductive Health, U.S. Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, 2001.
http://www.cdc.gov/...
Page 18:
Linking vital records
Death certificates for reproductive-aged
women who die can be linked with
certificates of reportable pregnancy
outcomes (live births and fetal deaths) that
occurred during the preceding year. Although
many states require that induced abortions
be reported, only one includes on its
records identifying data that could be used
to link those records with other
computerized records. Linking data sets is
being done in an increasing number of
states, and published reports indicate that
such links can increase case ascertainment
by 36% to 153% (Table 3, Box 3). However,
linking vital records cannot ensure that all
pregnancy-related deaths will be identified,
since only about two-thirds to
three-quarters of pregnancy-related deaths
are associated with either a live birth or a
fetal death. Excluded from linkages would be
deaths associated with ectopic pregnancies,
induced and some spontaneous abortions,
gestational trophoblastic disease, and
undelivered pregnancies.
NOTE: This figure of 36% is in error. The
figure should be 30%, as per Table 3 on page
19, which is the cited source (see below).
[141] Report: "Strategies to Reduce
Pregnancy-Related Deaths: From
Identification and Review to Action." By
Cynthia Berg and others. Division of
Reproductive Health, U.S. Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, 2001.
http://www.cdc.gov/...
Page 18:
Linking vital records
Death certificates for reproductive-aged
women who die can be linked with
certificates of reportable pregnancy
outcomes (live births and fetal deaths) that
occurred during the preceding year. Although
many states require that induced abortions
be reported, only one includes on its
records identifying data that could be used
to link those records with other
computerized records.
[142] Report: "Maternal Mortality
Surveillance, United States, 1980-1985." By
Lisa M. Koonin & others. Morbidity and
Mortality Weekly Report, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, December 1, 1988.
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00001754.htm
Finally, the coding system used by national
vital statistics and states to describe
maternal deaths includes a combination of
outcomes of pregnancy (e.g. ectopic
pregnancy, abortion), immediate causes of
death (e.g., hemorrhage), and underlying
obstetrical conditions that contribute to
death (e.g., obstructed labor). This system
of classification precludes a determination
of the real causes of maternal death. To
develop strategies to prevent maternal
deaths, public health personnel need to know
the immediate cause of death as well as the
underlying conditions that led to death.
[143] Report: "Strategies to Reduce
Pregnancy-Related Deaths: From
Identification and Review to Action." By
Cynthia Berg and others. Division of
Reproductive Health, U.S. Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, 2001.
http://www.cdc.gov/...
Page 25:
Maternal mortality review committees
In most cases, the state is the level at
which pregnancy-related deaths are reviewed,
although the process can occur in some very
large cities and counties. The legislation
that enables maternal mortality review and
the review committee's place within the
governmental organization vary widely from
state to state.
[144] Web page: "CDC's Abortion Surveillance
System: FAQs." Division of Reproductive
Health, National Center for Chronic Disease
Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for
Disease Control. Updated January 22, 2008.
http://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/Data_Stats/Abortion.htm
Are states required to report their abortion
statistics to CDC?
No, states and areas voluntarily report data
to CDC for report preparation. CDC's
Division of Reproductive Health prepares
surveillance reports as data becomes
available. There is no national requirement
for data submission or reporting.
Can I obtain a public use dataset for my own
analysis?
No public use dataset is available. To
obtain data for this surveillance system,
CDC assures states and areas that we will
maintain strict confidentiality of data
provided to us.
[145] Phone call to the Division of
Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease
Control, July 1, 2008. Just Facts requested
a state-by-state breakdown of the data in
Table 19 of "Abortion Surveillance ---
United States, 2004," which shows
abortion-related fatalities for 1972-2003.
The CDC would not release this data on the
grounds that it would violate their privacy
agreements with certain states.
[146] Paper: "Physician and Public Opinions
on Quality of Health Care and the Problem of
Medical Errors." By Andrew R. Robinson and
others. Archives of Internal Medicine,
October 28, 2002. Pages 2186-2190.
http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/reprint/162/19/2186
Page 2186: "Uniformly, physicians believed
that fear of medical malpractice is a
barrier to reporting of errors and that
greater legal safeguards are necessary for a
mandatory reporting system to be
successful."
Page 2189, Table 4: "Medical malpractice
litigation is a barrier to the reporting of
medical errors."
NOTE: 98.4% of physicians in the national
sample agreed with this statement.
[147] Report: "Vital Statistics of the
United States, 1989. Volume II Mortality,
Part A." National Center for Health
Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, 1993.
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsus/mort89_2a.pdf
Page 13 (in pdf):
SYMBOLS USED IN TABLES
Data not available ---
Category not applicable . . .
Quantity zero
Page 262 (page 277 in pdf): "Table 1-25.
Deaths From 282 Selected Causes, by Race
United States and Each State: 1989."
Cause of death
Maryland (all races)
Legally induced abortion
NOTE: Abortion-related mortality data
provided by the CDC's National Center for
Health Statistics is at variance with that
provided by CDC's Division of Reproductive
Health due to methodological
dissimilarities. The National Center for
Health Statistics is only cited here because
the Division of Reproductive Health does not
break down their national data on a state-by
states basis. In July 2008, Just Facts filed
a Freedom of Information Act Request with
the CDC for this data and is awaiting a
response.
[148] Report: "Vital Statistics of the
United States, 1990. Volume II Mortality,
Part A." National Center for Health
Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, 1994.
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsus/mort90_2a.pdf
Page 262 (page 278 in pdf): "Table 1-25.
Deaths From 282 Selected Causes, by Race
United States and Each State: 1990.
Cause of death
Maryland (all races)
Legally induced abortion
[149] Report: "Vital Statistics of the
United States, 1991. Volume II Mortality,
Part A." National Center for Health
Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, 1996.
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsus/mort91_2a.pdf
Page 262 (page 278 in pdf): "Table 1-25.
Deaths From 282 Selected Causes, by Race
United States and Each State: 1990."
Cause of death
Maryland (all races)
Legally induced abortion
[150] Report: "Vital Statistics of the
United States, 1992. Volume II Mortality,
Part B." National Center for Health
Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, 1996.
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsus/mort92_2b.pdf
Page 320 (Page 327 in pdf): Table 8-6:
"Deaths From 72 Selected Causes, by 10-Year
Age Groups, Race, and Sex."
Maryland, Cause of death:
Pregnancy with abortive outcome
Female
(total of all age groups)
White
All other
Black
[151] Autopsy number 89-593: "Erica
Richardson." By Julia C. Goodin & others.
Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, State
of Maryland, June 28, 1989. Autopsy
performed on March 3, 1989.
Page 1: "DESCRIPTION OF INJURY Close
examination of the anterior portion of the
uterus showed a large irregular perforation
of the anterior lower uterine wall which
extended into a portion of the cervix."
Page 5: "OPINION: This, 16 year old black
female, ERICA RICHARDSON, died from rupture
of lower uterus and cervix with
complications, including hemorrhage into the
pelvic cavity surrounding the uterus and air
embolism (air escaping into the vasculature
and heart). According to police reports, the
deceased was known to have been pregnant and
this is consistent with autopsy findings.
However, she had undergone and evacuation
[abortion] procedure which resulted in
perforation of the uterus."
[152] Article: "Teen's death after abortion
brings suit." By Larry Perl. Prince George's
Journal Weekly, May 30-31, 1990.
The malpractice suit claims that on the
evening of March 1, 1989, Dr. Gene Crawford
punctured 16-year-old Erica Kae Richardson's
uterus and cervix then left her "bleeding
to death" on an operating table in his
Laurel office for four hours, without
monitoring vital signs.
At 10:45 p.m., Crawford carried Richardson
to her aunt's car and told the aunt to "take
[her] home and out her to bed," the suit
states. The aunt, deciding that her niece
needed "emergency treatment," drove to Bowie
Health Center [], where Richardson was
rushed into the emergency room at 11 p.m.,
in respiratory arrest, and died shortly
after midnight the suit states.
Richardson's mother referred questions to
the attorneys. Donald McLaughlin said
Richardson's aunt, Denise Crarey, helped
Richardson get an abortion without telling
Richardson's mother. McLaughlin added that
though Crarey and Richardson's mother are
sisters, they have "a very strained
relationship." Crarey, a registered nurse,
took Richardson first to Washington Hospital
Center, which wouldn't perform the abortion
because Richardson was too far along in her
pregnancy, McLaughlin said.
[153] Article: "Mother is suing doctor:
Daughter died after abortion." By Melanie
Mader. Laurel Leader, June 29, 1990. Pages
A1, 3.
Page 3: "Richardson-Smith was unaware that
her daughter was having an abortion until
the Bowie medical center called her,
McLaughlin said."
[154] Press release: "Human Life
International Claims Maryland Health
Department 'Ignores, Covers-Up' Abortion
Deaths." PR Newswire, November 21, 1991.
"Erica Richardson, 16, died March 2, 1989,
just hours after an abortion was performed
upon her by Dr. Gene O. Crawford at his
Metropolitan Women's Center, 9811 Mallard
Dr., Laurel, Md."
[155] Article: "2 Tragedies Raise Doubts
About Suitland Clinic; Abortion Patient,
Left Paralyzed, Files Suit." By Retha Hill.
Washington Post, August 13, 1990. Page A1.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/
[156] Article: "2 Tragedies Raise Doubts
About Suitland Clinic; Abortion Patient,
Left Paralyzed, Files Suit." By Retha Hill.
Washington Post, August 13, 1990. Page A1.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/
[157] Article: "Botched-abortion victim dies
in Baltimore." Washington Times, December 2,
1992.
"Susanne Logan, the Forestville woman who
was paralyzed in a botched 1989 abortion at
a Suitland clinic, died in Baltimore
yesterday of complications from pneumonia,
just three weeks after she won a
multimillion-dollar settlement in her case."
[Pneumonia] is often the final complication
of some other debilitating disorder, and
this is why many people who get pneumonia
die. Any one whose resistance is already low
is very susceptible to pneumonia, so for
people who are dying of heart failure,
cancer, stroke or chronic bronchitis, the
actual cause of death is often pneumonia. In
anyone who is semiconscious or paralyzed,
infection of the lungs is extremely likely.
This is because under such conditions the
normal coughing reflex that keeps the lungs
clear of mucus and stagnant fluid is
reduced, or even absent.
[159] Book: Victims of Choice. By Kevin
Sherlock. Brennyman Books, 1996. Page 134:
"Gladyss Estanislao. This 28-year-old
married Filipina woman, a legal secretary
who lived in Prince George's County, died
May 12, 1989, 17 days after Alan Ross
reportedly performed a vacuum abortion on
her at the Wisconsin Avenue Women's Health
Care Center in Bethesda. Ross reportedly
failed to diagnose Gladyss was ectopically
pregnant, and then he reportedly botched the
abortion."
NOTE: The sources cited are Ms. Estanislao's
death certificate and a 12/5/91 article in
The Wanderer. Note the discrepancy with the
source below regarding the type of abortion
procedure.
[160] Article: "Sudden Death due to Rupture
of Ectopic Pregnancy Concurrent With
Therapeutic Abortion." By Ling Li & John E.
Smialek. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory
Medicine, July 1993. Pages 698-700.
Page 698: "In 1989, a case of sudden death
secondary to EP [ectopic pregnancy] was
investigated by the Office of the Chief
Medical Examiner for the State of Maryland,
Baltimore."
Page 699:
In 1989, a 28-year-old female college
student was found unresponsive on the
bathroom floor near her classroom. the
subject was transported to a local hospital
where she was pronounced dead on arrival.
Further investigation revealed that the
woman had been seen at a clinic for a missed
abortion 17 days before her death and
underwent a dilation and curettage [abortion
procedure]. No surgical specimen was sent to
the laboratory for pathologic examination
before she left the clinic.
A 0.3 cm rupture site was located on the
lateral surface [of the left fallopian
tube], surrounded by hemorrhagic tissue.
[161] Editorial: "Ectopic Pregnancy in
Association With Induced Abortion: Message
for the Pathologist." By Jane W. Hardman &
others. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory
Medicine, July 1993. Pages 696-697.
Page 696: "Admittedly, in each of these
cases there was a failure on the part of
clinicians to recognize the clinical signs
of ectopic pregnancy and to follow up with
the patients accordingly."
Page 697: "In summary, recommendations that
are already in place, had they been followed
in the cases reported by Drs Li and Smialek,
should have prevented the deaths of three
young women."
[162] Article: "Pregnancy." Contributor:
Lynn J. Romrell (Ph.D., Associate Dean for
Education and Professor of Anatomy and Cell
Biology, University of Florida College of
Medicine). World Book Encyclopedia, 2007
Deluxe Edition.
"An ectopic pregnancy occurs when a
fertilized egg implants itself outside the
uterus, usually inside the fallopian tube,
the tube through which the egg passes on its
way from the ovary to the uterus. The
developing baby cannot survive in an ectopic
pregnancy. The pregnancy may be fatal to the
mother if untreated."
[163] Book: Essentials of Medical
Ultrasound: A Practical Introduction to the
Principles, Techniques and Biomedical
Applications. Edited by Michael H. Repacholi
and Deirdre A. Benwell. Humana Press, 1982.
Chapter 5: "Clinical Applications of
Diagnostic Ultrasound. By Edward A. Lyons.
Page 176: "An important diagnosis to make it
that of an ectopic pregnancy. If the
pregnancy test is positive and the uterus is
empty, one may be able to visualize [via
ultrasound] a mass in the tube. In that
instance the diagnosis of ectopic is almost
100% certain."
[164] Textbook: Ultrasound and the Fallopian
Tube. Edited by Ilan E. Timor-Tritsch & Asim
Kurjak. Parthenon Publishing Group, 1996.
Chapter 5: "Conservative management of
ectopic pregnancy based on color Doppler
studies." By F. Bonilla Musoles & others.
Page 29:
One of the explicit advantages of the modern
pregnancy tests is that they can be
employed in the emergency room or in the
office of the gynecologist. This definitely
presents an advantage since, in applying
this pregnancy test followed by an office
ultrasound examination of the pelvis, a fast
and almost always reliable diagnosis of the
presence or absence of an abnormal or normal
intrauterine pregnancy can be made. In the
case of an ectopic pregnancy, the chances of
making the diagnosis during the first visit
to the gynecologist's office or the
emergency room are high.
Page 51: "Even with techniques currently
available, ectopic pregnancy results in
death for one of every 2000 women affected.
The incidence of ectopic pregnancies varies
between 0.5 and 1% of all pregnancies."
Page 52: "In most published reports about
ectopic pregnancies, the diagnosis is
established by [a specialized blood test] in
patients with a positive pregnancy test in
whom an intrauterine [in the uterus]
gestational sac, with or without
recognizable embryonic structures, cannot be
seen by ultrasound examination."
[165] Book: Victims of Choice. By Kevin
Sherlock. Brennyman Books, 1996. Pages 166-7
contain a photocopy of this letter. It is
from Stephen C. Joseph, New York City's
Commissioner of Health, and is dated June 5,
1987.
[166] Report: "Abortion Surveillance --
United States, 1996." By Lisa M. Koonin and
others. Division of Reproductive Health,
National Center for Chronic Disease
Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for
Disease Control, July 30, 1999.
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss4804a1.htm
a) "City of New York & Boroughs: Population
& Population Density from 1790."
Demographia. Accessed August 2008 at
http://www.demographia.com/dm-nyc.htm
The population of New York City (all five
boroughs; not just Manhattan) in 1980 was
7,072,000.
[169] Paper: "Cost consequences of induced
abortion as an attributable risk for preterm
birth and impact on informed consent." By
Byron C. Calhoun, Elizabeth Shadigian &
Brent Rooney. Journal of Reproductive
Medicine, October 2007. Pages 929-937.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17977168?dopt=Abstract
Page 930: "Fifty-nine studies were reviewed
for preterm birth and links to abortion....
From this review, we selected 5 of the most
recent, representative studies with an
association between induced abortion and
preterm birth as detailed examples of the 59
studies published in Appendix B...."
Pages 930-931:
Five large, recent, international studies
have shown an association of prior abortions
to preterm delivery3,6-9 (Table IV), and 50
studies over the last 50 years have shown a
statistically significant association
(Appendix B). All of the studies found a
statistically significant increase in
preterm births before 32 weeks for women
undergoing at least 1 first-trimester
abortion, with the ORs [odds ratios] ranging
from 1.3 to 2.5.3,6-9 Women undergoing [two
or more] abortions had an even larger risk
of preterm birth, with ORs ranging from 1.8
to 5.2.3,6-9.
Premature birth is a serious health problem.
Premature babies are at increased risk for
newborn health complications, as well as
lasting disabilities, such as mental
retardation, cerebral palsy, lung and
gastrointestinal problems, vision and
hearing loss, and even death. Many premature
babies require care in a neonatal intensive
care unit (NICU), which has specialized
medical staff and equipment that can deal
with the multiple problems faced by
premature infants.
All premature babies are at risk for health
problems, but those born before about 32
weeks of gestation face the highest risk.
[171] Web page: "Ask Dr. Cullins: Is having
an abortion emotionally and psychologically
dangerous?" Planned Parenthood, August 6,
2004. Updated 1/23/07. Accessed July 2008 at
http://www.plannedparenthood.org/...
[172] Web page: "Abortion Services: Risks
and Side Effects." Planned Parenthood of the
Rocky Mountains. Updated September 21, 2007.
Accessed July 2008 at
http://www.plannedparenthood.org/
[173] For another page that says essentially
the same thing: "Abortion Procedures."
Planned Parenthood, February 8, 2008.
Accessed July 2008 at
http://www.plannedparenthood.org/...
"Serious, long-term emotional problems after
abortion are about as uncommon as they are
after giving birth."
[174] Web page: "Pregnant, Now What?" By Jon
Knowles. Planned Parenthood, January 1,
1993. Revised 5/15/07 by Jennifer Johnsen.
Accessed July 2008 at
http://www.plannedparenthood.org/...
[175] Article: "Abortion Is Four Times
Deadlier Than Childbirth: New Studies Unmask
High Maternal Death Rates From Abortion." By
David C. Reardon. Post-Abortion Review,
April-June 2000.
http://www.afterabortion.org/PAR/V8/n2/finland.html
"Since Finland has socialized medical care,
these records are very accurate and
complete."
[176] Paper: "Suicides after Pregnancy in
Finland, 1987-94: Register Linkage Study."
By Mika Gissler, Elina Hemminki, & Jouko
Lonnqvist. British Medical Journal, December
7, 1996. http://bmj.com/
Information on suicides in women of
reproductive age was linked with the Finnish
birth, abortion, and hospital discharge
registers to find out how many women who
committed suicide had had a completed
pregnancy during her last year of life.
There were 73 suicides associated with
pregnancy, representing 5.4% of all suicides
in women in this age group. The mean annual
suicide rate was 11.3 per 100 000. The
suicide rate associated with birth was
significantly lower (5.9) and the rates
associated with miscarriage (18.1) and
induced abortion (34.7) were significantly
higher than in the population.
[177] Study: "Deaths Associated With
Pregnancy Outcome: A Record Linkage Study of
Low Income Women." By David C. Reardon and
others. Southern Medical Journal, August
2002. Pages 834-841.
http://www.afterabortion.org/...
Page 837, Table 2.
[178] Article: "Changing abortion's
pronoun." By Stephanie Simon. Los Angeles
Times, January 7, 2008.
http://www.latimes.com/...
[179] Study: "Deaths Associated With
Pregnancy Outcome: A Record Linkage Study of
Low Income Women." By David C. Reardon and
others. Southern Medical Journal, August
2002. Pages 834-841.
http://www.afterabortion.org/...
"The Society of Professional Journalists is
the nation's most broad-based journalism
organization, dedicated to encouraging the
free practice of journalism and stimulating
high standards of ethical behavior."
On Oct. 6, 2001 at its National Convention
in Seattle, the Society of Professional
Journalists passed a resolution urging
members and fellow journalists to take steps
against racial profiling in their coverage
of the war on terrorism and to reaffirm
their commitment to:
Use language that is informative and not
inflammatory....
When writing about terrorism, remember to
include white supremacist, radical
anti-abortionists and other groups with a
history of such activity.
Avoid using word combinations such as
"Islamic terrorist" or "Muslim extremist"
that are misleading because they link whole
religions to criminal activity.
America stands for an ideal that all people
are endowed by their Creator with certain
unalienable rights to life, liberty and the
pursuit of happiness. I know what it's like
to live without those rights and I have an
obligation to advocate them where ever they
are denied. In Bosnia or in Burma in Cuba or
in the Middle East and in our own country
when we fail to respect the inherent dignity
of all human life, born or unborn, and
that's why for 24 years, without changing,
without wavering, I have a steadfast and
strong advocacy and voting record in support
of the rights of the unborn.
"I'm not late in declaring that I believe
life begins at conception and that we ought
to protect human life and that's one of the
reasons that I am a Republican today,
because it was the only party that gave
people like me a voice and a choice."
[184] Article: G.O.P. Candidates Lay Into
Democrats, Not One Another." By Adam
Nagourney. New York Times, April 15, 2007.
http://www.nytimes.com/...
[185] Note that most all of the people
described by the media as "opponents of
abortion rights" are not unilaterally
opposed to abortion. Nearly all think that
abortion should be legal when there is a
threat to the life of the mother, and some
think there should be exceptions for rape
and incest. This also true of the examples
that follow. The people cited are not
unilaterally opposed to the "rights" in
question, but think that other "rights"
should take precedence. The same applies to
people who think that a preborn human's
"right to life" should take precedence over
other "rights."
NOTE: Since 1989, various Republicans have
sponsored at least 23 resolutions proposing
a Constitutional Amendment that would
guarantee preborn humans the right to life,
all of them containing an exception to
protect the life of the mother. Six of these
resolutions also include exceptions for
cases of rape or incest. [Search performed
on May 27, 2008 at
http://thomas.loc.gov/.
Bill texts from the 101st to 110th
Congresses searched for: 'amendment to the
Constitution of the United States with
respect to the right to life'.]
"[N]or shall private property be taken for
public use, without just compensation."
b) House editorial: "The Limits of Property
Rights." New York Times, June 24, 2005.
http://www.nytimes.com/...
"The Supreme Court's ruling yesterday that
the economically troubled city of New
London, Conn., can use its power of eminent
domain to spur development was a welcome
vindication of cities' ability to act in the
public interest. It also is a setback to the
"property rights" movement, which is trying
to block government from imposing reasonable
zoning and environmental regulations."
"The enumeration in the Constitution, of
certain rights, shall not be construed to
deny or disparage others retained by the
people."
b) Article: "Parents protest gay-themed
school plays." By Ellen Sorokin. Washington
Times, February 21, 2002.
"A group of parents is suing a public school
district in Novato, Calif., for allowing
their elementary school-age children to see
pro-homosexual plays at school without any
prior notice or parental consent."
"No person shall be deprived of life,
liberty, or property, without due process of
law...."
b) Ruling: Korematsu v. United States. U.S.
Supreme Court, December 18, 1944. Case 323
U.S. 214. Decided 6-3. Majority: Black,
Douglas, Reed, Rutledge, Stone. Concurring:
Frankfurter. Dissenting: Roberts, Murphy,
Jackson.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/...
It is said that we are dealing here with the
case of imprisonment of a citizen in a
concentration camp solely because of his
ancestry, without evidence or inquiry
concerning his loyalty and good disposition
towards the United States. Our task would be
simple, our duty clear, were this a case
involving the imprisonment of a loyal
citizen in a concentration camp because of
racial prejudice. Regardless of the true
nature of the assembly and relocation
centers-and we deem it unjustifiable to call
them concentration camps with all the ugly
connotations that term implies-we are
dealing specifically with nothing but an
exclusion order. To cast this case into
outlines of racial prejudice, without
reference to the real military dangers which
were presented, merely confuses the issue.
Korematsu was not excluded from the Military
Area because of hostility to him or his
race. He was excluded because we are at war
with the Japanese Empire, because the
properly constituted military authorities
feared an invasion of our West Coast and
felt constrained to take proper security
measures, because they decided that the
military urgency of the situation demanded
that all citizens of Japanese ancestry be
segregated from the West Coast temporarily,
and finally, because Congress, reposing its
confidence in this time of war in our
military leaders-as inevitably it
must-determined that they should have the
power to do just this. There was evidence of
disloyalty on the part of some, the military
authorities considered that the need for
action was great, and time was short. We
cannot-by availing ourselves of the calm
perspective of hindsight-now say that at
that time these actions were unjustified.
"The powers not delegated to the United
States by the Constitution, nor prohibited
by it to the States, are reserved to the
States respectively, or to the people."
"The Judicial power of the United States
shall not be construed to extend to any suit
in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted
against one of the United States by Citizens
of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects
of any Foreign State."
c) Article: "High court voids states'
immunity." By Frank J. Murray. Washington
Times, May 28, 2003.
"The Supreme Court ruled yesterday that a
Nevada social worker may sue the state for
firing him in violation of the Family and
Medical Leave Act, a decision that raised
the first barrier to states' broad 11th
Amendment immunity against private
lawsuits."
In order that the right of every pupil to
the free exercise of religion be guaranteed
within the schools and that the freedom of
each individual pupil be subject to the
least possible pressure from the
Commonwealth either to engage in, or to
refrain from, religious observation on
school grounds, the school board of each
school division shall establish the daily
observance of one minute of silence in each
classroom of the division.
During such one-minute period of silence,
the teacher responsible for each classroom
shall take care that all pupils remain
seated and silent and make no distracting
display to the end that each pupil may, in
the exercise of his or her individual
choice, meditate, pray, or engage in any
other silent activity which does not
interfere with, distract, or impede other
pupils in the like exercise of individual
choice.
c) Article: "Supreme Court upholds minute of
silence in schools." Associated Press,
October 30, 2001.
"The Supreme Court turned away a challenge
to Virginia's mandatory minute of silence in
schools on Monday, declining to take a
closer look at the silent prayer issue it
last examined 16 years ago."
[192] Just Facts searched the
New York Times
and Washington Post on July 11, 2008 and the
Associated Press on August 16th through
LexisNexis. Note that some articles contain
the quoted phrases more than once, and thus,
the numbers cited may represent an
undercount. The Washington Post archive does
not contain articles published in the
previous 14 days. Searches for "opponent(s)
of states' rights" were also performed for
the spelling variant "opponent(s) of
states rights."
[193] Entry: "abortion, partial-birth."
Melloni's Illustrated Medical Dictionary.
Edited by Ida G. Dox & others. Fourth
edition. Parthenon Publishing Group, 2002.
Page 2:
"partial-birth a. (PBA) Common term for
termination of a late pregnancy with a
breech presentation. Labor is induced by
conventional methods; the cervix is widely
dilated and delivery is expedited by
evacuation the cranial contents with a
suction catheter, then compressing the
cranium."
[194] Policy H-5.982: "Late-Term Pregnancy
Termination Techniques." American Medical
Association. Accessed July 2008 at
http://www.ama-assn.org/...
[195] Book: AMA Manual of Style: A Guide for
Authors and Editors. Tenth edition. Oxford
University Press, 2007. Page 295.
[197] Book: English for Journalists. By Wynford Hicks. Second edition. Routledge,
1998.
Page 73: "Jargon is specialized vocabulary,
familiar to the members of a group, trade or
profession. If you write for a newspaper or
general magazine you should try to translate
jargon into ordinary English whenever you
can. A common source of jargon is
scientific, medical, government and legal
handouts."
[198] Editorial: "Abortion and the court."
Chicago Tribune, July 13, 2005. Section C,
Page 26.
"There is a chance of reversal, though, on
certain late-term abortions. Five years ago,
by a 5-4 vote, the court struck down a
Nebraska law banning this procedure, also
known as intact dilation and extraction,
concluding that the measure imposed an undue
burden on the right to abortion."
[199] Book: The New York Public Library
Writer's Guide to Style and Usage. Edited by
Andrea J. Sutcliffe. Stonesong Press/Harper
Collins, 1994. Page 586.
[200] Book: The New Oxford Guide to Writing.
By Thomas S. Kane. Oxford University Press,
1988.
Page 199: "Jargon is technical language
misused. Technical language, the precise
diction demanded by any specialized trade or
profession, is necessary when experts
communicate with one another. It becomes
jargon when it is applied outside the limits
of technical discourse."
[201] Ruling: Roe v. Wade. U.S. Supreme
Court, January 22, 1973. Case 410 U.S. 113.
Decided 7-2. Majority: Blackmun, Burger,
Brennan, Douglas, Stewart, Marshall, Powell.
Concurring: Burger, Douglas, Stewart.
Dissenting: White, Rehnquist.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/...
Section VIII:
Specific and direct harm medically
diagnosable even in early pregnancy may be
involved. Maternity, or additional
offspring, may force upon the woman a
distressful life and future. Psychological
harm may be imminent. Mental and physical
health may be taxed by child care. There is
also the distress, for all concerned,
associated with the unwanted child, and
there is the problem of bringing a child
into a family already unable,
psychologically and otherwise, to care for
it. In other cases, as in this one, the
additional difficulties and continuing
stigma of unwed motherhood may be involved.
All these are factors the woman and her
responsible physician necessarily will
consider in consultation.
Section XI: "In Doe v. Bolton, post, p. 179,
procedural requirements contained in one of
the modern abortion statutes are considered.
That opinion and this one, of course, are to
be read together."
Section XI: "For the stage subsequent to
viability the State, in promoting its
interest in the potentiality of human life,
may, if it chooses, regulate, and even
proscribe, abortion except where necessary,
in appropriate medical judgment, for the
preservation of the life or health of the
mother."
[202] Ruling: Doe v. Bolton. U.S. Supreme
Court, January 22, 1973. Case 410 U.S. 179.
Decided 7-2. Majority: Blackmun, Brennan,
Stewart, Marshall, Powell. Concurring:
Burger, Douglas. Dissenting: White,
Rehnquist.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/...
Section IV:
C. the medical judgment may be exercised
in the light of all factors -- physical,
emotional, psychological, familial, and the
woman's age -- relevant to the well-being of
the patient. All these factors may relate to
health.
D. The appellants next argue that the
District Court should have declared
unconstitutional three procedural demands of
the Georgia statute: (2) that the
procedure be approved by the hospital staff
abortion committee; and (3) that the
performing physician's judgment be confirmed
by the independent examinations of the
patient by two other licensed physicians.
We conclude that the interposition of the
hospital abortion committee is unduly
restrictive of the patient's rights and
needs that, at this point, have already been
medically delineated and substantiated by
her personal physician.
There remains, however, the required
confirmation by two Georgia-licensed
physicians in addition to the recommendation
of the pregnant woman's own consultant
(making under the statute, a total of six
physicians involved, including the three on
the hospital's abortion committee). We
conclude that this provision, too, must
fall.
The statute's emphasis, as has been
repetitively noted, is on the attending
physician's "best clinical judgment that an
abortion is necessary." That should be
sufficient. The reasons for the presence of
the confirmation step in the statute are
perhaps apparent, but they are insufficient
to withstand constitutional challenge. If
a physician is licensed by the State, he is
recognized by the State as capable of
exercising acceptable clinical judgment.
If a physician is licensed by the State, he
is recognized by the State as capable of
exercising acceptable clinical judgment.
[203] Article: "Public Opinion About
Abortion -- An In-Depth Review: The
Pro-Choice/Pro-Life Divide." By Lydia Saad.
Gallup, January 22, 2002. Page 3.
http://www.gallup.com/...
Page 2:
The following chart illustrates the wide
range of attitudes toward abortion recorded
across a diverse set of questions about the
subject. The figures in the chart are based
on 146 survey questions asked by 18
different polling organizations over the
past five years.
For the most part, attitudes pertaining to
particular aspects of abortion are
consistent across differently worded
questions. But in a few cases, particularly
with respect to Roe v. Wade, the
responses vary widely, depending on the
information provided in the question.
Page 3:
Most survey questions about Roe v. Wade
provide the respondent with information
about the case, and these details appear to
have a major impact on the answers.
... If Roe v. Wade is presented only
as legalizing abortion in the first three
months, support for the decision is much
higher than if it is characterized as making
abortion legal throughout pregnancy or for
any reason.
Associated Press-Ipsos (November 2004): "The
1973 Supreme Court ruling called Roe v. Wade
made abortion in the first three months of
pregnancy legal."
Quinnipiac University (December 2004): "The
1973 Supreme Court ruling called Roe. v.
Wade made abortion in the first three months
of pregnancy legal. Do you think President
Bush should nominate Supreme Court justices
who would uphold the Roe. v. Wade decision,
or nominate Supreme Court justices who would
overturn the Roe v. Wade decision?"
Pew Research Center/Pew Forum on Religion &
Public Life (November 2006): "In 1973 the
Roe versus Wade decision established a
woman's constitutional right to an abortion,
at least in the first three months of
pregnancy."
NBC News/Wall Street Journal (December
2005): "The Supreme Court's 1973 Roe versus
Wade decision established a woman's
constitutional right to an abortion, at
least in the first three months of
pregnancy."
Harris Poll (October 2007): "In 1973, the
U.S. Supreme Court decided that states laws
which made it illegal for a woman to have an
abortion up to three months of pregnancy
were unconstitutional, and that the decision
on whether a woman should have an abortion
up to three months of pregnancy should be
left to the woman and her doctor to decide."
[205] There are other Associated Press
articles that used the same verbiage. The
three listed below are exemplars:
a) Article: "Vatican Pushing Mexico in
Abortion Fight." By Julie Watson. Associated
Press, March 23, 2007.
http://www.breitbart.com/...
"Most Latin American countries, including
Mexico, allow abortion if the woman's life
is in danger or in cases of rape or incest.
In November, Nicaragua bans abortion in all
cases. Cuba permits abortions within the
first 12 weeks of pregnancy, as does the
United States."
b) Article: "Mexicans March to Support
Abortion Law." By Carlos Rodriguez.
Associated Press, March 30, 2007.
http://origin.foxnews.com/...
"Most Latin American countries, including
Mexico, allow abortion if the woman's life
is in danger or in cases of rape or incest.
In November, Nicaragua passed a law banning
abortion in all cases. Cuba permits
abortions within the first 12 weeks of
pregnancy, as does the United States."
c) Article: "Mexico's Supreme Court poised
to reject appeal of legalized abortion in
the capital." By Olga R. Rodriguez.
Associated Press, August 27, 2008.
http://www.latimes.com/
"Most Latin American countries allow
abortion only if the woman's life is in
danger or in cases of rape or incest. In
2006, Nicaragua banned abortion in all
cases. Cuba permits abortions within the
first 12 weeks of pregnancy, as does the
United States."
NOTE: This document contains a transcribed
excerpt from the July 1, 2000 edition of the
show "Inside Washington," which is aired on
various PBS stations.
[209] House editorial: "Play Doctor -- and
Judge." Washington Post, Oct 27, 2003. Page
A18.
"The measure prohibits one form of abortion,
performed in the late second trimester or
third trimester of pregnancy; it is
gruesome, as indeed are all abortions this
late in pregnancy. But most states already
bar abortions after the point of viability,
unless the procedure is necessary to
preserve the life or health of the mother,
and Congress could have done likewise."
[210] Ruling: Roe v. Wade. U.S. Supreme
Court, January 22, 1973. Case 410 U.S. 113.
Decided 7-2. Majority: Blackmun, Burger,
Brennan, Douglas, Stewart, Marshall, Powell.
Concurring: Burger, Douglas, Stewart.
Dissenting: White, Rehnquist.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/...
Section VIII:
Specific and direct harm medically
diagnosable even in early pregnancy may be
involved. Maternity, or additional
offspring, may force upon the woman a
distressful life and future. Psychological
harm may be imminent. Mental and physical
health may be taxed by child care. There is
also the distress, for all concerned,
associated with the unwanted child, and
there is the problem of bringing a child
into a family already unable,
psychologically and otherwise, to care for
it. In other cases, as in this one, the
additional difficulties and continuing
stigma of unwed motherhood may be involved.
All these are factors the woman and her
responsible physician necessarily will
consider in consultation.
Section XI: "In Doe v. Bolton, post, p. 179,
procedural requirements contained in one of
the modern abortion statutes are considered.
That opinion and this one, of course, are to
be read together."
Section XI: "For the stage subsequent to
viability the State, in promoting its
interest in the potentiality of human life,
may, if it chooses, regulate, and even
proscribe, abortion except where necessary,
in appropriate medical judgment, for the
preservation of the life or health of the
mother."
[211] Ruling: Doe v. Bolton. U.S. Supreme
Court, January 22, 1973. Case 410 U.S. 179.
Decided 7-2. Majority: Blackmun, Brennan,
Stewart, Marshall, Powell. Concurring:
Burger, Douglas. Dissenting: White,
Rehnquist.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/...
Section IV:
C. the medical judgment may be exercised
in the light of all factors -- physical,
emotional, psychological, familial, and the
woman's age -- relevant to the well-being of
the patient. All these factors may relate to
health.
D. The appellants next argue that the
District Court should have declared
unconstitutional three procedural demands of
the Georgia statute: (2) that the
procedure be approved by the hospital staff
abortion committee; and (3) that the
performing physician's judgment be confirmed
by the independent examinations of the
patient by two other licensed physicians.
We conclude that the interposition of the
hospital abortion committee is unduly
restrictive of the patient's rights and
needs that, at this point, have already been
medically delineated and substantiated by
her personal physician.
There remains, however, the required
confirmation by two Georgia-licensed
physicians in addition to the recommendation
of the pregnant woman's own consultant
(making under the statute, a total of six
physicians involved, including the three on
the hospital's abortion committee). We
conclude that this provision, too, must
fall.
The statute's emphasis, as has been
repetitively noted, is on the attending
physician's "best clinical judgment that an
abortion is necessary." That should be
sufficient. The reasons for the presence of
the confirmation step in the statute are
perhaps apparent, but they are insufficient
to withstand constitutional challenge. If
a physician is licensed by the State, he is
recognized by the State as capable of
exercising acceptable clinical judgment.
If a physician is licensed by the State, he
is recognized by the State as capable of
exercising acceptable clinical judgment.
Page 3: "Networks Distort Abortion Report:
The Real Scoop on Koop."
[215] Article: "The Times Poll Public and
PressTwo Viewpoints Series: First of Two
Parts." By David Shaw. Los Angeles Times,
Aug 11, 1985.
http://www.latimes.com/
On the issue of "allowing women to have an
abortion" the newspaper journalists say
they favor allowing women to have an
abortion-by an almost 6-1 margin... (Readers
also approve allowing women to have an
abortion, though by a much narrower
margin51% to 42%.)
[M]embers of the press (at least the 3,165
newspaper reporters and editors from 621
newspapers interviewed for this story)....
[217] Article: "Public Opinion About
Abortion -- An In-Depth Review: Gender,
Religion and Other Group Attitudes Toward
Abortion." By Lydia Saad. Gallup, January
22, 2002.
http://www.gallup.com/...
[220] Article: "Public Opinion About
Abortion -- An In-Depth Review: Gender,
Religion and Other Group Attitudes Toward
Abortion." By Lydia Saad. Gallup, January
22, 2002.
http://www.gallup.com/...
NOTE: The poll was conducted in May 2001.
Percentages do not add up to 100% because
some agreed with neither statement or were
unsure.
States with a parental notification law in
effect (not including states that also have
a consent law in effect):
Alaska
Georgia
New Hampshire
Colorado
Iowa
South Dakota
Delaware
Maryland
West Virginia
Florida
Minnesota
Allows specified health professionals to
waive parental involvement in limited
circumstances.
While most states laws apply to all
minors, Delaware's law applies to women
younger than 16 and South Carolina's law
applies to those younger than 17.
Every person who applies a tattoo to any
minor under the age of eighteen is guilty of
a misdemeanor. It is not a defense to a
violation of this section that the person
applying the tattoo did not know the minor's
age unless the person applying the tattoo
establishes by a preponderance of the
evidence that he or she made a reasonable,
bona fide attempt to ascertain the true age
of the minor by requiring production of a
driver's license or other picture
identification card or paper and did not
rely solely on the oral allegations or
apparent age of the minor.
[227] New Jersey Law 2C:40-21: "Tattooing of
a minor; parental permission, required." New
Jersey Code of Criminal Justice. Accessed
June 29, 2012 at
http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/
A person commits a disorderly persons
offense if he knowingly tattoos or engages
in body piercing of a minor under the age of
18 years without first having obtained the
written permission of the minor's parent or
legal guardian or, if neither exists, a
person who stands in place of a parent.
[228] Senate Bill No. 746, CHAPTER 664: An
act to amend Section 22706 of, and to add
Section 2241.3 to, the Business and
Professions Code, relating to tanning
facilities." Approved by the governor on
October 9, 2011.
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/...
Section 22706 of the Business and
Professions Code is amended to read:
(b) (3) Persons under 18 years of age are
prohibited from using an ultraviolet tanning
device.
(4) Proof of age shall be satisfied with a
driver's license or other government issued
identification containing the date of birth
and a photograph of the individual.
Pew Research Center survey. Aug. 11-17,
2009. N=2,010 adults nationwide
"Do you strongly favor, favor, oppose, or
strongly oppose requiring that women under
the age of 18 get the consent of at least
one parent before they are allowed to have
an abortion?"
"A week after Politico provided the
questionnaire to the Obama campaign for
comment, an aide called Monday night to say
that Obama had said he did not fill out the
form, and provided a contact for his
campaign manager at the time, who said she
filled it out."
" 'Sen. Obama didn't fill out these state
Senate questionnaires a staffer did and
there are several answers that didn't
reflect his views then or now,' Tommy
Vietor, a spokesman for Obama's campaign,
said in an e-mailed statement."
But a Politico examination determined that
Obama was actually interviewed about the
issues on the questionnaire by the liberal
Chicago nonprofit group that issued it. And
it found that Obama the day after sitting
for the interview filed an amended version
of the questionnaire, which appears to
contain Obama's own handwritten notes added
to one answer.
Tommy Vietor, a spokesman for Obama's
campaign, said in an e-mailed statement. "He
may have jotted some notes on the front page
of the questionnaire at the meeting, but
that doesn't change the fact that some
answers didn't reflect his views. His 11
years in public office do."
[240] Senate Bill 562: "Parental Notice of
Abortion Act of 2001." State of Illinois
Senate, 92nd General Assembly, 2001-2002.
http://www.ilga.gov
Section 10. Definitions . "Minor" means any
person under 18 years of age who is not or
has not been married or who has not been
emancipated under the Emancipation of Mature
Minors Act.
Section 15. Notice to adult family member.
No person shall knowingly perform an
abortion upon a minor or upon an incompetent
person unless the person or his or her agent
has given at least 48 hours actual notice to
an adult family member of the pregnant minor
or incompetent person of his or her
intention to perform the abortion....
Section 20. Exceptions. Notice is not
required under this Act if (3) the
attending physician certifies in the
patient's medical record that a medical
emergency exists and there is insufficient
time to provide the required notice; or the
minor declares in writing that she is a
victim of sexual abuse, neglect, or physical
abuse by an adult family member as defined
in this Act....
Section 25. Procedure for judicial waiver of
notice. A minor or incompetent person may
petition any circuit court for a waiver of
the parental notice of abortion requirement
under this Act and may participate in
proceedings on her own behalf. All court
proceedings under this Section shall be
sealed. These proceedings shall be given
precedence over other pending matters to the
extent necessary to ensure that the court
reaches a decision promptly. Notice under
this Act shall be waived if the court finds
by clear and convincing evidence either:
(1) that the minor or incompetent person is
sufficiently mature and well-enough informed
to decide intelligently whether to have an
abortion; or
(2) that notification under Section 15 of
this Act would not be in the best interests
of the minor or incompetent person.
No fees shall be required of any minor or
incompetent person who avails herself of the
procedures provided by this Section.
Section 40. Penalties.
(a) A physician who willfully fails to
provide notice as required under this Act
before performing an abortion on a minor or
an incompetent person shall be referred to
the Illinois State Medical Disciplinary
Board for action in accordance with Section
22 of the Medical Practice Act of 1987.
(b) A person, not authorized under this Act,
who signs any waiver of notice under this
Act for a minor or incompetent person
seeking an abortion is guilty of a Class C
misdemeanor.
[241] Vote: "Senate Bill 562 - Parental
Notice of Abortion Act of 2001." State of
Illinois Senate, 92nd General Assembly,
April 6, 2001.
http://www.ilga.gov/...
Majority of those Elected. "Majority of
those elected" means an absolute majority of
the total number of Senators entitled to be
elected to the Senate, irrespective of the
number of elected or appointed Senators
actually serving in office. So long as 59
Senators are entitled to be elected to the
Senate, "majority of those elected" shall
mean 30 affirmative votes.
Article 5-1(f): "No bill shall be passed by
the Senate except on a roll call vote of a
majority of those elected."
NOTE: This rule was effective at the time of
Obama's vote. The same rule was still in
effect as of June 2008.
I'm happy to see so many good friends here
today, including Steve Trombley and Pam
Sutherland from my home state of Illinois.
We had a number of battles down in
Springfield for many many years and it is
wonderful to see that they are here today.
Steve and Pam will tell you that we fought
together in the Illinois State Senate
against restrictive choice legislationlaws
just like the federal abortion laws, the
federal abortion bans that are cropping up.
[245] Questionnaire: "2004 U.S. Senate
Candidates." Independent Voters of Illinois
Independent Precinct Organization,
December 15, 2003. Submitted by Barack Obama
on January 5, 2004.
http://blogs.suntimes.com/...
Question 28b: "Do you support parental or
spousal notification or consent to obtain an
abortion? I oppose spousal notification or
consent. Regarding parental notification, I
would oppose any legislation that does not
include a bypass provision for minors who
have been victims of, or have reason to
fear, physical or sexual abuse."
[246] Senate Bill 562: "Parental Notice of
Abortion Act of 2001." State of Illinois
Senate, 92nd General Assembly, 2001-2002.
http://www.ilga.gov/
Section 10. Definitions . "Minor" means any
person under 18 years of age who is not or
has not been married or who has not been
emancipated under the Emancipation of Mature
Minors Act.
Section 15. Notice to adult family member.
No person shall knowingly perform an
abortion upon a minor or upon an incompetent
person unless the person or his or her agent
has given at least 48 hours actual notice to
an adult family member of the pregnant minor
or incompetent person of his or her
intention to perform the abortion....
Section 20. Exceptions. Notice is not
required under this Act if (3) the
attending physician certifies in the
patient's medical record that a medical
emergency exists and there is insufficient
time to provide the required notice; or the
minor declares in writing that she is a
victim of sexual abuse, neglect, or physical
abuse by an adult family member as defined
in this Act....
Section 25. Procedure for judicial waiver of
notice. A minor or incompetent person may
petition any circuit court for a waiver of
the parental notice of abortion requirement
under this Act and may participate in
proceedings on her own behalf. All court
proceedings under this Section shall be
sealed. These proceedings shall be given
precedence over other pending matters to the
extent necessary to ensure that the court
reaches a decision promptly. Notice under
this Act shall be waived if the court finds
by clear and convincing evidence either:
(1) that the minor or incompetent person is
sufficiently mature and well-enough informed
to decide intelligently whether to have an
abortion; or
(2) that notification under Section 15 of
this Act would not be in the best interests
of the minor or incompetent person.
No fees shall be required of any minor or
incompetent person who avails herself of the
procedures provided by this Section.
Section 40. Penalties.
(a) A physician who willfully fails to
provide notice as required under this Act
before performing an abortion on a minor or
an incompetent person shall be referred to
the Illinois State Medical Disciplinary
Board for action in accordance with Section
22 of the Medical Practice Act of 1987.
(b) A person, not authorized under this Act,
who signs any waiver of notice under this
Act for a minor or incompetent person
seeking an abortion is guilty of a Class C
misdemeanor.
[247] Vote: "Senate Bill 562 - Parental
Notice of Abortion Act of 2001." State of
Illinois Senate, 92nd General Assembly,
April 6, 2001.
http://www.ilga.gov/...
"P [Present] Obama"
[248] Article: "Sen. Barack Obama's RH
[Reproductive Health] Issues Questionnaire."
By Andrea Lynch. RH Reality Check, December
21, 2007.
Does Sen. Obama believe adolescents should
have the right to choose abortion, or should
they be required to seek their parents'
consent? Why or why not? Are there any
circumstances that might make a compelling
case for waiving the parental consent
requirement?
As a parent, Obama believes that young
women, if they become pregnant, should talk
to their parents before considering an
abortion. But he realizes not all girls can
turn to their mother or father in times of
trouble, and in those instances, we should
want these girls to seek the advice of
trusted adults - an aunt, a grandmother, a
pastor.
Unfortunately, instead of encouraging
pregnant teens to seek the advice of adults,
most parental consent bills that come before
Congress or state legislatures criminalize
adults who attempt to help a young woman in
need and lack judicial bypass and other
provisions that would permit exceptions in
compelling cases.
[249] Bypass Provisions for State Abortion
Parental Consent and Notification Laws. This
table was made through research conducted on
July 28-29, 2008 of each state's
codes/statutes. Most of these provisions are
for judicial bypass, although some states
allow doctors to invoke them.
State
Code/Statute
Operative language for exceptions
AL*
§26-21
"best interest of the minor"
AK
§18.16
"physical abuse, sexual abuse, or a pattern of emotional abuse minor's best interest"
AZ
§36-2152
"her best interests sexual conduct with a minor by the minor's parent, stepparent, uncle, grandparent, sibling "
AR
§20-16-804
"her best interests"
CA*
§123450
"minor's best interest"
CO
§12-37.5-105, §12-37.5-107
"child abuse or neglect", "best interest of the minor"
DE
Title 24, §1784
"best interest of the minor"
FL
Title 29, §390.01114
"child abuse or sexual abuse of the petitioner by one or both of her parents or her guardian best interest of the petitioner"
GA
§15-11-112
"best interests of the minor"
ID
§18-609A
"best interests of the minor"
IL*
Chap. 750, §70/20, §70/25
"victim of sexual abuse, neglect, or physical abuse by an adult family member", "best interests of the minor"
IN
§16-34-2-4
"minor's best interests"
IA
§135L.3
"best interest of the pregnant minor"
KS
§65-6705
"best interest of the minor"
KY
§311.732
"best interest of the minor"
LA
§40.1299.35.5
"best interest of the minor"
MD
§20-103
"physical or emotional abuse of the minor best interest of the minor"
MA
Chapter 112, §12s
"in her best interests"
MI
§722.904
"best interests of the minor"
MN*
§144.343
"victim of sexual abuse, neglect, or physical abuse"
MS
§41-41-55
"best interests of the minor"
MO
§188.028. 2
"best interest of the minor"
MT
§50-20-212
"physical, sexual, or emotional abuse of the petitioner by one or both parents, a guardian, or a custodian best interests of the petitioner"
NE
§71-6903, §71-6906
"best interests of the pregnant woman", "victim of abuse sexual abuse child abuse"
NV*
§442.255
"her best interests"
NJ*
§9:17A-1.7
"physical, sexual or emotional abuse of the minor by the parent, guardian or legal custodian ... best interests of the minor"
NM*
§30-5-1
[No exceptions]
NC
§90-21.8
"minor's best interests"
ND
§14-02.1-03.1
"best interests of the minor"
OH
§2919.121
"best interests of the minor"
OK
Title 63, §1-740.2, §1-740.3
"victim of sexual abuse", "her best interest"
PA
§3206
"best interests of the woman"
RI
§23-4.7-6
"her best interests"
SC
§44-41-30, §44-41-32
"pregnancy is the result of incest", "best interest of the minor"
SD
§34-23A-7
"her best interests"
TN
§37-10-304
"minor's best interests"
TX
§33.003
"minor's best interest physical, sexual, or emotional abuse of the minor"
UT
§76-7-304.4, §76-7-304.5
"incest parent or guardian has abused the minor parent or guardian has not assumed responsibility for the minor's care and upbringing", "minor's best interest"
VA
§16.1-241
"her best interest abused or neglected"
WV
§16-2F-3
"minor's best interest"
WI
§48.375
"sexual assault pregnancy is the result of sexual intercourse with a caregiver minor's best interests"
[251] "Opinion number 90-19 of the Attorney
General of New Mexico (Hal Stratton)." By
Paul Farley (Assistant Attorney General).
October 3, 1990.
Page 2: "New Mexico's current criminal
abortion statute, NMSA 1978, §§ 30-5-1 to
30-5-3 (Supp.) 1990 was passed in 1969.
The statute further requires that any
abortion either be performed only with the
women's consent or, if she is under eighteen
years of age, then at the request of the
minor and then her living parent or
guardian."
Page 4: "New Mexico's criminal abortion law
does not provide for such a bypass, as
required by existing U.S. Supreme Court
precedent."
Page 7: "We further conclude that New
Mexico's parental consent provision may
become enforceable either through
legislative enactment of the amendments
discussed above or, under certain
circumstances, through modification of
federal abortion jurisprudence."
"We must protect girls from exploitation and
statutory rape through a parental
notification requirement."
[254] Coroner's Report: "Rebecca Suzanne
Bell." By Dennis J. Nicholas, M.D. (Coroner
of Marion County, Indiana). Case number
88-0880. October 3, 1988.
"She was somewhat improved on Wednesday but
was found on Friday, September 16 when her
father went home at about noon and she was
ill. He took her for an x-ray which showed
pneumonia bilaterally. She was hospitalized
where she went into cardiopulmonary arrest
later that night."
[255] Autopsy report: "Rebecca Suzanne
Bell." By Jesse C. Giles. Forensic Division,
Department of Pathology, Indiana University
School of Medicine, September 17, 1988, 7:30
A.M. Signatories: John E. Pless, M.D.
(Forensic Pathologist, Division of Forensic
Pathology) & Jesse C. Giles, M.D. (Fellow in
Forensic Pathology, Division of Forensic
Pathology).
Page 1: "CAUSE OF DEATH Septic Abortion with
Pneumonia MANNER OF DEATH Undetermined"
Pages 5-6: "REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEM: There is
evidence of recent pregnancy with recent
partial abortion. The uterus is enlarged
consistent with current pregnancy of age
approximately 2-3 months."
"a disease of the lungs characterized
especially by inflammation and consolidation
of lung tissue followed by resolution and by
fever, chills, cough, and difficulty in
breathing and that is caused especially by
infection"
[258] Article: "Abortion debate shifting;
Individuals become symbols in dispute." By
Joe Frolik. Cleveland Plain Dealer,
September 9, 1990.
http://www.cleveland.com/plaindealer/
"With Clark in tow, she went to a Planned
Parenthood clinic where a counselor listed
her options. She was told an Indiana minor
has to get a parent's written consent for an
abortion."
Written consent of parent or guardian of
unemancipated pregnant woman under 18 years
of age....
Sec. 4. (a) No physician shall perform an
abortion on an unemancipated pregnant woman
less than eighteen (18) years of age without
first having obtained the written consent of
one (1) of the parents or the legal guardian
of the minor pregnant woman.
(b) A minor:
(1) who objects to having to obtain the
written consent of her parent or legal
guardian under this section; or
(2) whose parent or legal guardian refuses
to consent to an abortion; may petition, on
her own behalf or by next friend, the
juvenile court for a waiver of the parental
consent requirement under subsection (a)
(c) A physician who feels that compliance
with the parental consent requirement in
subsection (a) would have an adverse effect
on the welfare of the pregnant minor or on
her pregnancy may petition the juvenile
court within twenty-four (24) hours of the
abortion request for a waiver of the
parental consent requirement under
subsection (a)
(d) The juvenile court must rule on a
petition filed by a pregnant minor under
subsection (b) or by her physician under
subsection (c) within forty-eight (48) hours
of the filing of the petition. Before ruling
on the petition, the court shall consider
the concerns expressed by the pregnant minor
and her physician. The requirement of
parental consent under this section shall be
waived by the juvenile court if the court
finds that the minor is mature enough to
make the abortion decision independently or
that an abortion would be in the minor's
best interests.
[260] Coroner's Report: "Rebecca Suzanne
Bell." By Dennis J. Nicholas, M.D. (Coroner
of Marion County, Indiana). Case number
88-0880. October 3, 1988.
"Investigation disclosed that REBECCA BELL
became pregnant in mid-May 1988 (according
to Planned Parenthood referral receipt). She
did not confide this information to her
parents. According to her friend, HEATHER
CLARK, REBECCA BELL told the father of the
unborn child about the pregnancy and he
broke off all contact with her in mid-July.
REBECCA BELL told HEATHER CLARK that she
intended to have an abortion."
[261] Article: "Abortion debate shifting;
Individuals become symbols in dispute." By
Joe Frolik. Cleveland Plain Dealer,
September 9, 1990.
http://www.cleveland.com/plaindealer/
" Heather Clark, a neighbor and Becky's
closest friend at the time of her death.
With Clark in tow, she went to a Planned
Parenthood clinic where a counselor listed
her options. Most minors, she was told,
simply go out of state. Louisville is less
than 100 miles away."
[262] Coroner's Report: "Rebecca Suzanne
Bell." By Dennis J. Nicholas, M.D. (Coroner
of Marion County, Indiana). Case number
88-0880. October 3, 1988.
"REBECCA BELL also reportedly has a history
of substance abuse for which she was
hospitalized from mid-February through
April, 1988."
[263] Coroner's Report: "Rebecca Suzanne
Bell." By Dennis J. Nicholas, M.D. (Coroner
of Marion County, Indiana). Case number
88-0880. October 3, 1988.
"She had told conflicting stories about
abortion plans and the exact circumstances
of the abortion are not known."
[264] Article: "Abortion debate shifting;
Individuals become symbols in dispute." By
Joe Frolik. Cleveland Plain Dealer,
September 9, 1990.
http://www.cleveland.com/plaindealer/
"For a time, Clark says, she was going to
have an abortion. Then she was going to have
the baby and put it up for adoption. Or run
away to California. "She was just really
confused," Clark said."
[265] Phone call to Marion County Coroner's
Office, August 21, 2008. "Dr. Dennis
Nicholas is no longer a coroner and he has
passed."
[266] Article: "Abortion debate shifting;
Individuals become symbols in dispute." By
Joe Frolik. Cleveland Plain Dealer,
September 9, 1990.
http://www.cleveland.com/plaindealer/
"According to Dr. Dennis J. Nicholas, the
coroner here in Marion County, Becky Bell
was killed by pneumonia brought on by the
use of unsterile instruments during an
illegal abortion."
[267] Book: Choices: Women Speak Out About
Abortion. Edited by Karen A Schneider. NARAL
Foundation, 1997. Chapter entitled "Becky
Bell." By Karen Bell (Becky's mother). Pages
24-27. Page 26: "The coroner performed an
autopsy and called us. 'Your Rebecca Suzanne
died from an illegal, botched abortion;
dirty instruments had been used.' "
NOTE: The county coroner did not perform the
autopsy and was not present for it. See next
footnote.
[268] Autopsy report: "Rebecca Suzanne
Bell." By Jesse C. Giles. Forensic Division,
Department of Pathology, Indiana University
School of Medicine, September 17, 1988, 7:30
A.M. Signatories: John E. Pless, M.D.
(Forensic Pathologist, Division of Forensic
Pathology) & Jesse C. Giles, M.D. (Fellow in
Forensic Pathology, Division of Forensic
Pathology).
Page 2: "IDENTIFICATION Persons present
for the autopsy included Dr. John E. Pless,
Evidence Technician Jim Floyd, Mr. Steven
O'Neal and David Becsey."
Page 4: "LUNGS Bronchopneumonia is
bilateral with the left lower lobe being
severe and the left and right upper lobes
being moderate."
[269] Article: "In Debate on Abortion, 2
Girls Make It Real." By Tamar Lewin. New
York Times, October 27, 1991.
http://query.nytimes.com/...
"They have appeared on '60 Minutes,' walking
through their daughter's graveyard and
talking about how they blame the law for
their daughter's death."
[270] Book: Choices: Women Speak Out About
Abortion. Edited by Karen A Schneider. NARAL
Foundation, 1997. Chapter entitled "Becky
Bell." By Karen Bell (Becky's mother). Pages
24-27.
Page 26: "One day, we got a letter from
Peter Jennings. He wanted us to be on the
news to talk about Becky, who was the first
teenager known to die because of a parental
consent law."
[271] Article: "Abortion debate shifting;
Individuals become symbols in dispute." By
Joe Frolik. Cleveland Plain Dealer,
September 9, 1990.
http://www.cleveland.com/plaindealer/
"This summer, Bill Bell quit his job. For
the next year, he and Karen will tour the
country talking against parental involvement
laws, their expenses paid by Smeal's Fund
for the Feminist Majority."
[272] Article: "A Rush to Blame in Becky
Bell's Death." By Cal Thomas. Washington
Times, August 9, 1990. Page G1.
"Miss Bell's parents have announced plans to
use their daughter's death as a rallying cry
against such laws. They also have
participated in the creation of a video they
want to show in public schools and
universities that they hope will lead to the
repeal of parental consent legislation."
[273] Article: "In Debate on Abortion, 2
Girls Make It Real." By Tamar Lewin. New
York Times, October 27, 1991.
http://query.nytimes.com/...
"They have appeared on '60 Minutes,' walking
through their daughter's graveyard and
talking about how they blame the law for
their daughter's death."
[274] Book: Choices: Women Speak Out About
Abortion. Edited by Karen A Schneider. NARAL
Foundation, 1997. Chapter entitled "Becky
Bell." By Karen Bell (Becky's mother). Pages
24-27.
Page 26: "One day, we got a letter from
Peter Jennings. He wanted us to be on the
news to talk about Becky, who was the first
teenager known to die because of a parental
consent law."
[275] Transcript # 198:
Larry King Live.
CNN, December 24, 1990.
[Cybil Shepherd:] Abortion will continue,
whether it's legal or not. It's not the
question of whether abortion will be around,
it's just a question of whether you're going
to have women - women are already dying of
illegal abortions. Becky Bell in Indiana
couldn't go to her parents, there was a
parental consent law. She had a good
relationship with her parents, but she could
not face up to going to her parents and
asking permission to get consent to have an
abortion. She went and had an illegal
abortion, she died of it. Her parents are
traveling around the country talking to
state legislatures trying to get through to
these people what parental consent means.
[276] Article: "In Debate on Abortion, 2
Girls Make It Real." By Tamar Lewin. New
York Times, October 27, 1991.
http://query.nytimes.com/...
"Since Becky's death, her parents, Karen and
Bill, have traveled to 23 states to testify
or lobby against parental notification
laws.... Their story has appeared in a
variety of publications, including Seventeen
magazine and Rolling Stone."
[277] Article: "Teenagers and Abortion." By
Eloise Salholz and others. Newsweek, January
8, 1990.
"Late in the summer of '88, the Indianapolis
high-school junior made her way to Planned
Parenthood to figure out her options. She
chose abortion, but not on Indiana's terms:
rather than seek the consent of one parent,
as state law required, she planned to have
the procedure performed on a Saturday in
Kentucky. But in the interim, desperate, she
tried a home remedy. By Friday she was
dead."
[278] Pamphlet: "NO WAY OUT: Young, Pregnant
and Trapped by the Law." Reproductive
Freedom Project of the American Civil
Liberties Union Foundation, 1991.
In the prime of her life, Becky Bell, a
17-year-old Indiana teenager, died of a
massive septic infection from a botched
illegal abortion. At the time, Indiana
required that a young woman obtain the
consent of a parent or a judge before having
an abortion. To avoid "disappointing" her
parents by telling them that she was
pregnant, Becky did what hundreds of
thousands of women did before legalized
abortion -- she bought "medical care" in the
back alley.1 [Footnote 1: CBS 60 Minutes,
February 24, 1991.]
[279] Review: "Teen-Agers Face Reality On
Both Sides of Screen." By John J. O'Connor.
New York Times, October 13, 1992.
http://query.nytimes.com/...
Home Box Office has been noticeably more
vigorous lately in its pursuit of original
programming.
A good case in point is this evening's
abortion essay: "Public Law 106: The Becky
Bell Story."
Becky ends up having an illegal abortion
and dying of a resultant infection. The
story begins with her being rushed to the
hospital by her distraught, helpless
parents.
[280] Results from a search performed
September 9, 2008:
(1) "Abortion is a woman's choice."
Miami
Herald, August 16, 2008.
"I think, first, of Becky Bell, who in 1988
died of an illegal abortion because she was
too ashamed to comply with Indiana's
requirement that she notify her parents of
her intent to end her pregnancy."
[282] Article: "Pros, cons of parental
notification of abortion debated." By
Jennifer Bundy, Associated Press, February
21, 2006.
"Indiana had a parental notification law in
1988. But Bell's daughter, Becky, did not
want to tell her parents, so she had an
illegal abortion. She died a week later from
complications caused by dirty instruments
used in the procedure, her father said after
a news conference preceding the hearing."
[283] Paper: "Parental Involvement Laws for
Abortion in the United States and the United
Nations Conventions on the Rights of the
Child: Can International Law Secure the
Right to Choose for Minors?" By Katie
Hatziavramidis. Texas Journal of Women and
the Law, Spring 2007.
Becky Bell, a teenager who became pregnant
in Indiana, a state that requires parental
consent for an abortion, was too embarrassed
to tell her parents of her pregnancy.36
Instead, Becky sought an illegal abortion.37
She died of complications a week later, at
the age of seventeen.38
Thus, the argument that parental involvement
laws are beneficial because they prevent
abortions rings hollow; they merely increase
the possibility that a minor may delay or
reject safe, legal healthcare in favor of
more clandestine but potentially dangerous
procedures.
The author is an attorney in the greater
Chicago area, and her interests center on
human and civil rights matters, particularly
employment discrimination. She has testified
before the Texas Senate on parental
involvement laws and been active in the
fields of gender and reproductive rights for
over a decade.
[284] Article: "In Debate on Abortion, 2
Girls Make It Real." By Tamar Lewin. New
York Times, October 27, 1991.
http://query.nytimes.com/...
"The mission of HLI is to promote and defend
the sanctity of life and family around the
world according to the teachings of the
Roman Catholic Church through prayer,
service and education."
[287] Autopsy report: "Rebecca Suzanne
Bell." By Jesse C. Giles. Forensic Division,
Department of Pathology, Indiana University
School of Medicine, September 17, 1988, 7:30
A.M. Signatories: John E. Pless, M.D.
(Forensic Pathologist, Division of Forensic
Pathology) & Jesse C. Giles, M.D. (Fellow in
Forensic Pathology, Division of Forensic
Pathology).
[288] Entry: "abortion."
American Heritage
Dictionary of Science. Edited by Robert K.
Barnhart. Houghton Mifflin, 1986.
"a birth that occurs before the embryo or
fetus develops enough to live on its own,
usually during the first twelve weeks of
pregnancy (spontaneous abortion) SYN:
miscarriage."
[289] Editorial: "In Indiana and Maryland, a
tale of two abortions." By James A. Miller
(director of research for Human Life
International). Baltimore Evening Sun,
February 15, 1991. Page A21.
I tracked down the doctor who performed
Becky Bell's autopsy, Jesse Giles.
Incredibly enough, Becky Bell's parents
never bothered to talk to the doctor who
wrote the report.
When Giles wrote the word "abortion" in his
autopsy report, he never imagined that
abortion advocates would one day look over
his shoulder and seize upon that word to
promote their agenda. Giles used the word
"abortion" in the way it had always been
used in medicine prior to the national
debate. He meant a spontaneous abortion. In
short, he meant a miscarriage.
If Giles had meant a deliberate surgical
abortion, he would have used the word
"induced" to describe it. Giles told me that
there is no evidence of an induced abortion,
and in his professional opinion Becky Bell
suffered a miscarriage.
Unfortunately, another pathologist stuck the
word "septic" immediately before the word
"abortion" on the report's cover page.
[290] Press Release: "Human Life
International Comments on HBO's
'Pro-Abortion Fraud': The Becky Bell Story."
PR Newswire, October 20, 1992.
Giles believes Becky Bell "underwent a
spontaneous abortion, a miscarriage." (3)
Moreover, Giles has flatly stated that "I am
astounded that they would assert that my
(autopsy) report proves that there was an
instrumented, illegal abortion." (4)
3. Personal communications, Dr. Jesse C.
Giles with James A. Miller, HLI Director of
Research, fall and winter of 1990, spring
1991.
4. Personal communication, Dr. Jesse C.
Giles, Feb. 25, 1991, the day after CBS's
"60 Minutes" broadcast of "The Becky Bell
Story." The "they" referred to by Giles was
"60 Minutes" and the Bell parents.
[291] Emails sent to Dr. Giles on July 31
and August 11, 2008 went unanswered. On
August 11th Dr. Giles was reached via phone
and he stated, "I don't really want to talk
about the case."
"Jesse Giles was a fellow in training at
the time of the autopsy. He was present for
the autopsy - but he was operating under my
supervision."
[293] Article: "Abortion debate shifting;
Individuals become symbols in dispute." By
Joe Frolik. Cleveland Plain Dealer,
September 9, 1990.
http://www.cleveland.com/plaindealer/
While performing an autopsy on her, Dr. John
Pless, head of forensic pathology at Indiana
University Medical Center, found fetal
material and evidence of an infection in
Becky's genital tract. To him, that
indicated a botched abortion.*
Pathologist Pless says, "we can't determine"
precisely how Bell died. He found no
evidence of internal injury, which he felt
ruled out a self-induced abortion. Nor were
there any marks on Becky's cervix that would
be left by the instruments commonly used for
clinic abortions. He theorizes someone
pushed something up her cervix without
leaving a sign.
"I cannot prove she had an illegal abortion.
I cannot prove she had anything but a
spontaneous abortion," said Pless, who said
he based his conclusions on "the
percentages" of what would most likely to
produce the results he observed.
* NOTE: When asked by Just Facts if this was
an accurate representation of his view, Dr.
Pless responded, "I did not say that it was
a botched abortion. Those are not my words.
I would never use the work 'botched'. It
could have been an abortion performed
correctly by all standards that got
infected. If Becky Bell's parents knew that
she had had surgery then they could have
taken her to the doctor for antibiotic
therapy which would have saved her life if
administered when she first developed
symptoms." [e-mail: August 1, 2008.]
[294] Autopsy report: "Rebecca Suzanne
Bell." By Jesse C. Giles. Forensic Division,
Department of Pathology, Indiana University
School of Medicine, September 17, 1988, 7:30
A.M. Signatories: John E. Pless, M.D.
(Forensic Pathologist, Division of Forensic
Pathology) & Jesse C. Giles, M.D. (Fellow in
Forensic Pathology, Division of Forensic
Pathology). Pages 5-6:
REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEM There is evidence of
recent pregnancy with recent partial
abortion. The uterus is enlarged consistent
with current pregnancy of age approximately
2-3 months. The lower third of the uterine
cavity has only the usual flat mucosa
without obvious evidence of instrumentation.
However, the upper 2/3 of the uterine cavity
has a mixture of blood clot and necrotic
[dead] and hemorrhagic [bloody] products of
conception. The serosa [outer lining] of
the uterus is smooth and glistening and
without exudate [anything oozing from it],
and there are no areas of perforation or pus
in or around the uterus.
August 1, 2008: "The infection spread
through the blood stream from the uterus to
the lungs. The source of the infection was
the tissue products from the pregancy [sic]
that had been incompletely removed."
August 4, 2008: "I can not rule out a
spontaneous abortion. The presence of
infection suggests that it was not
spontaneous."
August 11, 2008: "The same micro-organism
was cultured in the uterus and the lung. It
is unlikely that the infection originated in
the lung and then went to the uterus."
[296] Autopsy report: "Rebecca Suzanne
Bell." By Jesse C. Giles. Forensic Division,
Department of Pathology, Indiana University
School of Medicine, September 17, 1988, 7:30
A.M. Signatories: John E. Pless, M.D.
(Forensic Pathologist, Division of Forensic
Pathology) & Jesse C. Giles, M.D. (Fellow in
Forensic Pathology, Division of Forensic
Pathology). Page 6:
SPECIMENS FOR CULTURE: Blood bacterial
culture, lung tissue swabs for bacterial
culture and bilateral pleural [membrane
surrounding the lungs and chest cavity]
fluid swabs for bacterial culture.
MICROSCOPIC EXAMINATION: Tissue samples
representative of the major organs have been
processed onto glass slides for microscopic
examination. These histologic specimens have
been examined and there are no additional
significant pathologic findings other than
those noted on the Anatomic Findings.
[297] Autopsy report: "Rebecca Suzanne
Bell." By Jesse C. Giles. Forensic Division,
Department of Pathology, Indiana University
School of Medicine, September 17, 1988, 7:30
A.M. Signatories: John E. Pless, M.D.
(Forensic Pathologist, Division of Forensic
Pathology) & Jesse C. Giles, M.D. (Fellow in
Forensic Pathology, Division of Forensic
Pathology). Pages 3-4:
"NECK ORGANS: The mucosa of the hypopharynx,
larynx and trachea is smooth and glistening
without ulceration or tumor."
[298] Email from Dr. Pless, August 21, 2008.
"There was no upper airway disease - so the
only possiblity [sic] was spread from the
uterus. Yes, my memory could be faulty after
20 years."
[299] Autopsy report: "Rebecca Suzanne
Bell." By Jesse C. Giles. Forensic Division,
Department of Pathology, Indiana University
School of Medicine, September 17, 1988, 7:30
A.M. Signatories: John E. Pless, M.D.
(Forensic Pathologist, Division of Forensic
Pathology) & Jesse C. Giles, M.D. (Fellow in
Forensic Pathology, Division of Forensic
Pathology).
Page 2: "CIRCUMSTANTIAL SUMMARY Blood
culture from the hospital showed no growth,
but sputum [mucus and other matter from the
lungs] cultures grew streptococcus pneumoniae."
Understanding of how the human pathogen
Streptococcus pneumoniae perceives and
responds to its environment in the host
offers insight into the pathogenesis of
disease caused by this important bacterium
and the potential for improved
interventions.
S. pneumoniae is normally found as a
harmless commensal of the human upper
respiratory tract. However, depending on
host and bacterial factors that are not
fully understood, the pneumococcus is also a
major cause of diseases such as pneumonia,
meningitis, septicaemia, bronchitis and
otitis media.
Page 357: "[T]he importance of genes to
virulence varies with the site of
infection...."
Page 361: "Pneumococcal [Streptococcus
pneumoniae] TCSs are important virulence
factors of this significant human pathogen.
Interestingly, their contribution to
virulence can vary depending on pneumococcal
strain and infection site."
[301] Book: Case Files: Microbiology,
Second edition. By
Eugene C. Toy and others.
McGraw-Hill Medical, 2008.
Page 150: "Streptococcus pneumoniae
(pneumococcus) commonly colonizes the
upper airway in humans, more frequently in
children than adults. Pneumococcal
pneumonia {What Becky had} typically follows
a milder upper respiratory infection."
In viral pneumonia, the history includes an
upper respiratory infection of gradual
onset. Bacterial pneumonia {What Becky had}
has a more sudden onset; the student will
usually appear ill, with fever, chills,
cough, and chest pain.
The signs and symptoms that accompany
pneumonia in older children include a
nonproductive cough, fever, pleural pain,
dyspnea, and an increased respiratory rate.
NOTE: Observe that there is no mention of
upper airway disease in the quote above.
[303] Email from Dr. Pless, September 2,
2008. Note that Dr. Pless was not asked to
modify the report.
[304] Review: "Teen-Agers Face Reality On
Both Sides of Screen." By John J. O'Connor.
New York Times, October 13, 1992.
http://query.nytimes.com/...
"Becky ends up having an illegal abortion
and dying of a resultant infection. "The
Becky Bell Story" is tough and persuasive."
[305] Press Release: "Human Life
International Comments on HBO's
'Pro-Abortion Fraud': The Becky Bell Story."
PR Newswire, October 20, 1992.
"Becky, accompanied by best friend 'Kelly,'
is shown entering a small building in a
seedy part of town and then walking upstairs
to meet her illegal, "back-alley"
abortionists."
[306] Coroner's Report: "Rebecca Suzanne
Bell." By Dennis J. Nicholas, M.D. (Coroner
of Marion County, Indiana). Case number
88-0880. October 3, 1988.
[307] Autopsy report: "Rebecca Suzanne
Bell." By Jesse C. Giles. Forensic Division,
Department of Pathology, Indiana University
School of Medicine, September 17, 1988, 7:30
A.M. Signatories: John E. Pless, M.D.
(Forensic Pathologist, Division of Forensic
Pathology) & Jesse C. Giles, M.D. (Fellow in
Forensic Pathology, Division of Forensic
Pathology).
[308] Book: Choices: Women Speak Out About
Abortion. Edited by Karen A Schneider. NARAL
Foundation, 1997. Chapter entitled "Becky
Bell." By Karen Bell (Becky's mother). Pages
24-27.
[309] Article: "Abortion debate shifting;
Individuals become symbols in dispute." By
Joe Frolik. Cleveland Plain Dealer,
September 9, 1990.
http://www.cleveland.com/plaindealer/
Heather Clark, a neighbor and Becky's
closest friend at the time of her death.
With Clark in tow, she went to a Planned
Parenthood clinic where a counselor listed
her options.
Heather Clark fought back anger -- she
didn't believe then her friend had had an
abortion and still doesn't.
Thursday night, Clark stopped by to visit.
She says Becky asked her to schedule an
abortion in Louisville for Saturday.
[310] Coroner's Report: "Rebecca Suzanne
Bell." By Dennis J. Nicholas, M.D. (Coroner
of Marion County, Indiana). Case number
88-0880. October 3, 1988.
"REBECCA BELL reportedly was at a party
where various drugs were being used
(cocaine, "speed" and LSD) on the week-end
of September 10-11, claimed that someone had
put "speed" or cocaine in her drink."
[311] Book: Choices: Women Speak Out About
Abortion. Edited by Karen A Schneider. NARAL
Foundation, 1997. Chapter entitled "Becky
Bell." By Karen Bell (Becky's mother). Pages
24-27.
Page 25: "I was laying awake in bed waiting
for her to come home. At 12:45 in the
morning, I heard her trying to open the
door. She was crying and said, 'Mom, it was
a horrible party. I feel like I've got the
flu like Dad.' "
[312] Article: "Abortion debate shifting;
Individuals become symbols in dispute." By
Joe Frolik. Cleveland Plain Dealer,
September 9, 1990.
http://www.cleveland.com/plaindealer/
"On Tuesday, she fainted at work."
[313] Article: "Abortion debate shifting;
Individuals become symbols in dispute." By
Joe Frolik. Cleveland Plain Dealer,
September 9, 1990.
http://www.cleveland.com/plaindealer/
"On Tuesday, she fainted at work. She stayed
home the next two days, resisting her
parents' pleas that she go to the doctor."
NOTE: Observe that there is a possible
disparity with the next footnote regarding
the first day in which she stayed home from
school.
[314] Coroner's Report: "Rebecca Suzanne
Bell." By Dennis J. Nicholas, M.D. (Coroner
of Marion County, Indiana). Case number
88-0880. October 3, 1988.
"On Tuesday, September 13, she awoke with a
neck ache, stayed home from school and
developed an elevated temperature. She was
somewhat improved on Wednesday...."
[315] Book: Choices: Women Speak Out About
Abortion. Edited by Karen A Schneider. NARAL
Foundation, 1997. Chapter entitled "Becky
Bell." By Karen Bell (Becky's mother). Pages
24-27. Page 25:
After school on Monday, she still felt sick.
By Wednesday she had a fever of 104 and a
strange cough. I told her we were going to
the doctor. She turned white. She said,
'Mom, oh, Mom, please, oh, please, I don't
want to go. Just give me some aspirin and
I'll be okay, please, please.'
She was nearly hysterical, so I respected
her wishes.
[316] Article: "Abortion debate shifting;
Individuals become symbols in dispute." By
Joe Frolik. Cleveland Plain Dealer,
September 9, 1990.
http://www.cleveland.com/plaindealer/
"Thursday night, Clark stopped by to visit.
She says Becky asked her to schedule an
abortion in Louisville for Saturday."
[317] Article: "Abortion debate shifting;
Individuals become symbols in dispute." By
Joe Frolik. Cleveland Plain Dealer,
September 9, 1990.
http://www.cleveland.com/plaindealer/
Friday morning, Becky staggered to the
bathroom. Bleeding. Her mom assumed she was
having her period. After helping Becky back
to bed, she insisted they go to the doctor.
At last, Becky agreed.
The family physician diagnosed severe
pneumonia and sent her to the hospital.
[318] Coroner's Report: "Rebecca Suzanne
Bell." By Dennis J. Nicholas, M.D. (Coroner
of Marion County, Indiana). Case number
88-0880. October 3, 1988.
"She was somewhat improved on Wednesday but
was found on Friday, September 16 when her
father went home at about noon and she was
ill. He took her for an x-ray which showed
pneumonia bilaterally."
[319] Autopsy report: "Rebecca Suzanne
Bell." By Jesse C. Giles. Forensic Division,
Department of Pathology, Indiana University
School of Medicine, September 17, 1988, 7:30
A.M. Signatories: John E. Pless, M.D.
(Forensic Pathologist, Division of Forensic
Pathology) & Jesse C. Giles, M.D. (Fellow in
Forensic Pathology, Division of Forensic
Pathology).
Page 2: "CIRCUMSTANTIAL SUMMARY She was
taken to St. Vincent hospital approximately
4:00 PM on Friday, September 16, 1988."
[320] Book: Choices: Women Speak Out About
Abortion. Edited by Karen A Schneider. NARAL
Foundation, 1997. Chapter entitled "Becky
Bell." By Karen Bell (Becky's mother). Pages
24-27.
Page 26: "Late that night, with grandma,
grandpa, and other relatives gathered, the
doctor said, 'We don't know if we can save
the baby.' And I thought, 'The baby? My God,
Becky was pregnant.' "
[321] Autopsy report: "Rebecca Suzanne
Bell." By Jesse C. Giles. Forensic Division,
Department of Pathology, Indiana University
School of Medicine, September 17, 1988, 7:30
A.M. Signatories: John E. Pless, M.D.
(Forensic Pathologist, Division of Forensic
Pathology) & Jesse C. Giles, M.D. (Fellow in
Forensic Pathology, Division of Forensic
Pathology).
Page 2: "CIRCUMSTANTIAL SUMMARY She
subsequently experienced an unexpected
cardiopulmonary arrest, and was transferred
to the Intensive Care Unit where she died at
11:29 PM on September 16, 1988."
[322] Autopsy number 89-593: "Erica
Richardson." By Julia C. Goodin & others.
Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, State
of Maryland, June 28, 1989. Autopsy
performed on March 3, 1989.
Page 1: "DESCRIPTION OF INJURY Close
examination of the anterior portion of the
uterus showed a large irregular perforation
of the anterior lower uterine wall which
extended into a portion of the cervix."
Page 5: "OPINION: This, 16 year old black
female, ERICA RICHARDSON, died from rupture
of lower uterus and cervix with
complications, including hemorrhage into the
pelvic cavity surrounding the uterus and air
embolism (air escaping into the vasculature
and heart). According to police reports, the
deceased was known to have been pregnant and
this is consistent with autopsy findings.
However, she had undergone and evacuation
[abortion] procedure which resulted in
perforation of the uterus."
[323] Article: "Teen's death after abortion
brings suit." By Larry Perl. Prince George's
Journal Weekly, May 30-31, 1990.
The malpractice suit claims that on the
evening of March 1, 1989, Dr. Gene Crawford
punctured 16-year-old Erica Kae Richardson's
uterus and cervix then left her "bleeding
to death" on an operating table in his
Laurel office for four hours, without
monitoring vital signs.
At 10:45 p.m., Crawford carried Richardson
to her aunt's car and told the aunt to "take
[her] home and out her to bed," the suit
states. The aunt, deciding that her niece
needed "emergency treatment," drove to Bowie
Health Center, where Richardson was rushed
into the emergency room at 11 p.m., in
respiratory arrest, and died shortly after
midnight the suit states.
Richardson's mother referred questions to
the attorneys. Donald McLaughlin said
Richardson's aunt, Denise Crarey, helped
Richardson get an abortion without telling
Richardson's mother. McLaughlin added that
though Crarey and Richardson's mother are
sisters, they have "a very strained
relationship." Crarey, a registered nurse,
took Richardson first to Washington Hospital
Center, which wouldn't perform the abortion
because Richardson was too far along in her
pregnancy [19 weeks], McLaughlin said.
[324] Article: "Mother is suing doctor:
Daughter died after abortion." By Melanie
Mader. Laurel Leader, June 29, 1990. Pages
A1, 3.
Page 1: "[T]he 16-year-old Cheltenham
girl...."
Page 3: "Richardson-Smith was unaware that
her daughter was having an abortion until
the Bowie medical center called her,
McLaughlin said."
[325] Press release: "Human Life
International Claims Maryland Health
Department 'Ignores, Covers-Up' Abortion
Deaths." PR Newswire, November 21, 1991.
"Erica Richardson, 16, died March 2, 1989,
just hours after an abortion was performed
upon her by Dr. Gene O. Crawford at his
Metropolitan Women's Center, 9811 Mallard
Dr., Laurel, Md."
(1) The physician may perform the abortion,
without notice to a parent or guardian of a
minor if, in the professional judgment of
the physician:
(i) Notice to the parent or guardian may
lead to physical or emotional abuse of the
minor;
(ii) The minor is mature and capable of
giving informed consent to an abortion; or
(iii) Notification would not be in the best
interest of the minor.
(2) The physician is not liable for civil
damages or subject to a criminal penalty for
a decision under this subsection not to give
notice.
[327] Report: Sexual Assault of Young
Children as Reported to Law Enforcement:
Victim, Incident, and Offender
Characteristics." By Howard N. Snyder.
Bureau of Justice Statistics, U. S.
Department of Justice, July 2000.
http://ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/saycrle.pdf
Page 1: "The 1991 through 1996 NIBRS master
files contain reports from law enforcement
agencies in 12 States: Alabama, Colorado,
Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Massachusetts,
Michigan, North Dakota, South Carolina,
Utah, Vermont, and Virginia. These reports
were scanned to identify incidents of sexual
assault."
Page 3 (graph): "Age profiles of sexual
assault victims, by offense category:
Forcible rape."
NOTE: The raw data used to construct this
graph was e-mailed by the Bureau of Justice
Statistics to Just Facts on August 14, 2008.
[328] Book: Sex and America's Teenagers. By
Patricia Donovan & others. Guttmacher
Institute, 1994.
Page 28: "Forced Sex Adapted from [the
source cited in the footnote below. Page
111, Table 2]. Those who answered
affirmatively to the question "Was there
ever a time when you were forced to have sex
against your will, or were raped?" were
classified as having had involuntary
intercourse."
Data extracted from Figure 17:
Age of females
who had intercourse
Involuntary
intercourse only
Both voluntary and involuntary intercourse
Voluntary
intercourse only
15 and younger
26%
14%
60%
[329] Study: "Nonvoluntary Sexual Activity
Among Adolescents." By Kristin Anderson
Moore & others. Family Planning
Perspectives, May - June, 1989. Page
110-114.
Page 110: "Data from the 1987 round of the
National Survey of Children indicate that
seven percent of Americans aged 18-22 have
experienced at least one episode of
nonvoluntary sexual intercourse. Women were
more likely than men to report having had
such an experience, with just under half of
all nonvoluntary experiences among women
occurring before age 14."
Page 111: Data extracted from "Table 2.
Cumulative proportions of young people who
had experienced intercourse prior to given
ages ":
Gender, Race, Age*
Percentage who had
experienced voluntary
intercourse
Percentage who had
experienced intercourse
(voluntary or involuntary)
Female, white, < 16 years old
10.6
15.3
Female, black, < 16 years old
20.7
23.5
NOTE: The figures in this chart are based
upon raw numbers. Since the survey had an
overrepresentation of black people as
compared to the general U.S. population, the
figures in the previous footnote are
weighted to compensate for this
overrepresentation.
Page 112: "Clearly, among both black and
white women at younger ages, the proportions
who had experienced intercourse are
considerably higher when nonvoluntary sex is
included in the estimate. Seven percent of
white women reported having experienced
intercourse by their 14th birthday, but only
two percent reported having had a voluntary
sexual experience by that age."
[330] Study: "Extent, Nature, and
Consequences of Rape Victimization: Findings
From the National Violence Against Women
Survey." By Patricia Tjaden and Nancy
Thoennes. U.S. Department of Justice, June
2006.
http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/210346.pdf
Page 18: "Survey results show that rape
occurs at an early age for many rape
victims21.6 percent of women and 48 percent
of men were younger than 12 years old when
they were first raped, and 32.4 percent of
women and 23 percent of men were between
ages 12 and 17. Thus, more than half (54
percent) of female victims and nearly
three-quarters (71 percent) of male victims
were first raped before their 18th
birthday."
[331] Arkansas State Code, Title 20,
Subtitle 2, Chapter 16, Subchapter 8:
"Abortion Parental Notification." Arkansas
General Assembly. Accessed June 2008 at
http://www.arkleg.state.ar.us/
20-16-801. Consent required.
Except as otherwise provided in §§ 20-16-804
and 20-16-805, no person may perform an
abortion upon an unemancipated minor or upon
a woman for whom a guardian or custodian has
been appointed because of a finding of
incompetency unless the person or the
person's agent first obtains the written
consent of either parent or the legal
guardian or custodian.
20-16-802. Definitions.
(3) "Minor" means an individual under
eighteen (18) years of age;
(4) "Parent" means:
(A) Either parent of the pregnant woman if
they are both living;
(B) One (1) parent of the pregnant woman if
only one (1) is living or if the second one
cannot be located through reasonably
diligent effort; or
(C) The court-appointed guardian or
custodian if the pregnant woman has one
[332] Article: "Granite City Abortion Clinic
Part Of Rape Investigation." By Cordell
Whitlock. Channel 5, KDSK, St. Louis,
November 16, 2006.
http://www.ksdk.com/
"Police in Bryant, Ark., say Cheshier began
assaulting the juvenile last year. In
October, he was arrested and charged with
rape. The victim told police Cheshier had
gotten her pregnant and forced her to have
an abortion."
[333] Article: "Protesters' photos may be
clue in rape case." By Shane Graber. St.
Louis Post-Dispatch, November 17, 2006.
http://www.stltoday.com/
"The teen told police he got her pregnant
and took her to a St. Louis-area abortion
clinic in March, the affidavit said."
[334] Article: "Federal judge rejects
request to enforce Illinois abortion law."
Associated Press, March 2, 2008.
"The Parental Notice of Abortion Act was
passed in 1984 and updated in 1995 but never
enforced because the Illinois Supreme Court
refused to issue rules spelling out how
judges should handle appeals of the
notification requirement."
"Illinois Enforcement permanently or
temporarily enjoined by a court order;
policy not in effect."
[336] Article: "Granite City Abortion Clinic
Part Of Rape Investigation." By Cordell
Whitlock. Channel 5, KDSK, St. Louis,
November 16, 2006.
http://www.ksdk.com/
"Angela Michael frequently protests outside
the clinic and police used a photo she took
of Cheshier's car to prove he was there in
March."
[337] Phone conversation with the arresting
officer of Jeffrey Cheshier, June 12, 2008.
Cheshier committed suicide. He was the
alleged victim's stepfather. The girl kept
detailed records on her calendar, and as
such, Cheshier was facing about 12 counts of
rape.
Sec. 2431. Transportation of minors in
circumvention of certain laws relating to
abortion
(a) Offense-
(1) GENERALLY- Except as provided in
subsection (b), whoever knowingly transports
a minor across a State line, with the intent
that such minor obtain an abortion, and
thereby in fact abridges the right of a
parent under a law requiring parental
involvement in a minor's abortion decision,
in force in the State where the minor
resides, shall be fined under this title or
imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
(b) Exceptions-
(1) The prohibition of subsection (a) does
not apply if the abortion was necessary to
save the life of the minor because her life
was endangered by a physical disorder,
physical injury, or physical illness,
including a life endangering physical
condition caused by or arising from the
pregnancy itself.
(2) A minor transported in violation of this
section, and any parent of that minor, may
not be prosecuted or sued for a violation of
this section, a conspiracy to violate this
section, or an offense under section 2 or 3
based on a violation of this section. ...
Sec. 2435. Child interstate abortion
notification
(a) Offense-
(1) GENERALLY- A physician who knowingly
performs or induces an abortion on a minor
in violation of the requirements of this
section shall be fined under this title or
imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
(2) PARENTAL NOTIFICATION- A physician who
performs or induces an abortion on a minor
who is a resident of a State other than the
State in which the abortion is performed
must provide, or cause his or her agent to
provide, at least 24 hours actual notice to
a parent of the minor before performing the
abortion. If actual notice to such parent is
not possible after a reasonable effort has
been made, 24 hours constructive notice must
be given to a parent.
(b) Exceptions- The notification requirement
of subsection (a)(2) does not apply if
(1) the abortion is performed or induced in
a State that has, in force, a law requiring
parental involvement in a minor's abortion
decision and the physician complies with the
requirements of that law;
(2) the physician is presented with
documentation showing with a reasonable
degree of certainty that a court in the
minor's State of residence has waived any
parental notification required by the laws
of that State, or has otherwise authorized
that the minor be allowed to procure an
abortion;
(3) the minor declares in a signed written
statement that she is the victim of sexual
abuse, neglect, or physical abuse by a
parent, and, before an abortion is performed
on the minor, the physician notifies the
authorities specified to receive reports of
child abuse or neglect by the law of the
State in which the minor resides of the
known or suspected abuse or neglect;
(4) the abortion is necessary to save the
life of the minor because her life was
endangered by a physical disorder, physical
injury, or physical illness, including a
life endangering physical condition caused
by or arising from the pregnancy itself, or
because in the reasonable medical judgment
of the minor's attending physician, the
delay in performing an abortion occasioned
by fulfilling the prior notification
requirement of subsection (a)(2) would cause
a substantial and irreversible impairment of
a major bodily function of the minor arising
from continued pregnancy, not including
psychological or emotional conditions, but
an exception under this paragraph does not
apply unless the attending physician or an
agent of such physician, within 24 hours
after completion of the abortion, notifies a
parent in writing that an abortion was
performed on the minor and of the
circumstances that warranted invocation of
this paragraph; or
(5) the minor is physically accompanied by a
person who presents the physician or his
agent with documentation showing with a
reasonable degree of certainty that he or
she is in fact the parent of that minor.
[340] Study: "Statutory Rape: A Guide to
State Laws and Reporting Requirements. By
Asaph Glosser, Karen Gardiner & Mike
Fishman. Prepared for the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services by the Lewin
Group, December 15, 2004.
http://www.hhs.gov/opa/pubs/statutory-rape-state-laws.pdf
Pages 15-16 (in pdf file): "Table 1: State
Age Requirements."
[341] Study: "Statutory Rape: A Guide to
State Laws and Reporting Requirements. By
Asaph Glosser, Karen Gardiner & Mike
Fishman. Prepared for the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services by the Lewin
Group, December 15, 2004.
http://www.hhs.gov/opa/pubs/statutory-rape-state-laws.pdf
Page 12: "Each state's reporting
requirements identify certain individuals
who are required to notify the authorities
of suspected abuse. Although it varies by
state, mandated reporters are typically
individuals who encounter children through
their professional capacity."
NOTES:
Pages 17-126 outline the laws in each state.
The following 29 states and the District Of
Columbia have laws that necessitate
reporting of a sexual relationship between a
22-year-old man and a 13-year-old girl:
Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, California,
Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Idaho,
Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine,
Massachusetts, Missouri, Nebraska, New
Hampshire, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma,
Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina,
Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Washington,
Wisconsin, Wyoming.
The following 20 states have laws that
necessitate reporting of a sexual
relationship between a 22-year-old man and a
13-year-old girl if the suspected
perpetrator has care, control or custody of
the child: Arizona, Delaware, Florida,
Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maryland,
Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nevada,
New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North
Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Dakota,
Virginia, West Virginia.
Montana does not have a law that explicitly
requires reporting of sexual abuse.
"As an anti-abortion pro-life organization,
we fight to change the abortion picture - to
end legal abortion and return the right to
life to unborn babies from the moment of
conception. Our motto is, 'Pro-Life: without
compromise, without exception, without
apology.' "
"What she learned is that more than 90
percent of the clinic employees handling the
calls said they would conceal the
information provided by the caller,
according to Life Dynamics president Mark
Crutcher."
NOTE: Tapes were made of the phone calls and
some have been circulated to the media, who
has confirmed their authenticity. Details in
the facts to follow.
[348] Article: "Connecticut Abortion Clinics
Look The Other Way." By Ted Greenberg. WTIC
TV, May 22, 2002.
http://fox61.trb.com/
"So what does Planned Parenthood have to say
about all this? Not much. As we did with the
child advocate, we wanted to play the tapes
for them and get their reaction, but they
refused unless they could hear them first.
We agreed to play the tapes over the phone
for them, but still they refused an
on-camera interview. Instead, they issued
this short statement."
[349] Article: "Connecticut Abortion Clinics
Look The Other Way." By Ted Greenberg. WTIC
TV, May 22, 2002.
http://fox61.trb.com/
"So we made some calls to Connecticut
Planned Parenthood centers and we asked for
the names we heard. Some were not overly
common names, like Heidi and Glenda. We
found they indeed worked there. Also, the
tones placing the calls on the tape match
the Planned Parenthood phone numbers."
NOTE: Transcripts of some of the phone
conversations were contained in this
article, which is no longer posted.
American Medical News is the newspaper for
America's physicians. Published since 1958,
it is one of the most widely read
publications in the United States on news
affecting the medical profession. From
Medicare and managed care to public health
and practice management, no other source
covers the same range of current events
affecting medical practice.
American Medical News is published by the
American Medical Association and is intended
to serve as a credible forum for information
affecting physicians and their practices.
The content of articles and the opinions
expressed in AMNews are not necessarily
endorsed by the AMA.
[356] Article: "Veto-proof majority in House
votes to prohibit late-term procedure." By
Diane M. Gianelli. American Medical News,
November 20, 1995.
NOTE: The next footnote corroborates this.
[357] Entry: "abortion, partial-birth."
Melloni's Illustrated Medical Dictionary.
Edited by Ida G. Dox & others. Fourth
edition. Parthenon Publishing Group, 2002.
Page 2:
"partial-birth a. (PBA) Common term for
termination of a late pregnancy with a
breech presentation. Labor is induced by
conventional methods; the cervix is widely
dilated and delivery is expedited by
evacuation the cranial contents with a
suction catheter, then compressing the
cranium."
NOTE: This article describes the procedure
in detail.
[359] Ruling: Gonzales v. Carhart. United
States Supreme Court, April 18, 2007. Case
05-380. Decided 5-4. Majority: Kennedy,
Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, Alito. Concurring:
Thomas, Scalia. Dissenting: Ginsburg,
Stevens, Souter, Breyer.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/...
Section I (A): "[Partial-birth abortion]
gained public notoriety when, in 1992, Dr.
Martin Haskell gave a presentation
describing his method of performing the
operation."
[360] Article: "An Abortion Rights Advocate
Says He Lied About Procedure." By David
Stout. New York Times, February 26, 1997.
http://query.nytimes.com/...
"Ron Fitzsimmons, the executive director of
the National Coalition of Abortion
Providers . In the vast majority of cases,
the procedure is performed on a healthy
mother with a healthy fetus that is 20 weeks
or more along, Mr. Fitzsimmons said."
[361] Twenty weeks after fertilization.
Intrauterine picture taken under the
direction of Professor Andrzej Skawina of
Collegium Medicum Jagiellonian University
(Krakow, Poland) and Antoni Marsinek of the
Czerwiakowski Gynecological and Obstetrics
Hospital (Krakow, Poland); Photographers:
Andrzej Zachwieja and Jan Walczewski.
Copyright: Life Issues.
NOTE: A number of different photographers
have published intrauterine photos. I asked
several such individuals if I could
reproduce their pictures, and Life Issues
was the only one that gave permission. The
pictures from Life Issues look similar to
those taken by the other photographers.
[362] Bill: "H.R. 1833 - Partial-Birth
Abortion Ban Act of 1995 (Enrolled as Agreed
to or Passed by Both House and Senate)."
U.S. Congress, March 27, 1996.
http://thomas.loc.gov/
(a) Any physician who, in or affecting
interstate or foreign commerce, knowingly
performs a partial-birth abortion and
thereby kills a human fetus shall be fined
under this title or imprisoned not more than
two years, or both. This paragraph shall not
apply to a partial-birth abortion that is
necessary to save the life of a mother whose
life is endangered by a physical disorder,
illness, or injury: Provided, That no other
medical procedure would suffice for that
purpose. This paragraph shall become
effective one day after enactment.
(b)(1) As used in this section, the term
'partial-birth abortion' means an abortion
in which the person performing the abortion
partially vaginally delivers a living fetus
before killing the fetus and completing the
delivery.
Cosponsors: 155 total (20 Democrats, 135
Republicans).
[364] Web page: "Major Actions - H.R.1833:
To amend title 18, United States Code, to
ban partial-birth abortions." U.S. Library
of Congress. Accessed September 3, 2008 at
http://thomas.loc.gov/
DATE
ACTION
6/14/1995
Introduced in House
11/1/1995
Passed in House by Yeas and Nays: 288 139 (Roll Call 756).
12/7/1995
Passed in Senate with amendments by Yeas and Nays: 54 44 (Vote No. 596).
3/27/1996
Passed in House with Senate amendments by Yeas and Nays: 286 129 (Roll Call 94).
4/10/1996
Vetoed by President.
9/19/1996
Passed in House with the two-third majority required to override a Presidential veto by Yeas and Nays: 285 - 137 (Roll Call 422).
9/26/1996
Failed in Senate without the two-third majority required to override a Presidential veto by Yeas and Nays: 58-40 (Vote No. 301).
[365] Calculated with data from the
following sources:
a) Vote Number 596: "H.R. 1833 - To amend
title 18, United States Code, to ban
partial-birth abortions." U.S. Senate,
December 7, 1995.
http://www.senate.gov/...
Voted YES
Voted NO
Not Voting
Republican
45
7
Democratic
9
37
1
b) Vote Number 94: "H.R. 1833 - To amend
title 18, United States Code, to ban
partial-birth abortions (Agree to Senate
Amendments)." U.S. House of Representatives,
March 27, 1996.
http://thomas.loc.gov/
Voted YES
Voted NO
Not Voting
Republican
214
15
6
Democratic
72
113
9
Independent
1
Totals from House and Senate votes above:
Voted YES
Voted NO
Not Voting
Total
Republican
259 (90%)
22 (8%)
6 (2%)
287
Democratic
81 (34%)
150 (63%)
9 (4%)
241
[366] Bill: "H.R. 1122 - Partial-Birth
Abortion Ban Act of 1997 (Enrolled as Agreed
to or Passed by Both House and Senate)."
U.S. Congress, October 8, 1997.
http://thomas.loc.gov/
(a) Any physician who, in or affecting
interstate or foreign commerce, knowingly
performs a partial-birth abortion and
thereby kills a human fetus shall be fined
under this title or imprisoned not more than
two years, or both. This paragraph shall not
apply to a partial-birth abortion that is
necessary to save the life of a mother whose
life is endangered by a physical disorder,
illness, or injury. This paragraph shall
become effective one day after enactment.
(b)(1) As used in this section, the term
'partial-birth abortion' means an abortion
in which the person performing the abortion
partially vaginally delivers a living fetus
before killing the fetus and completing the
delivery.
[367] Web page: "Major Actions - H.R. 1122:
To amend title 18, United States Code, to
ban partial-birth abortions." U.S. Library
of Congress. Accessed September 3, 2008 at
http://thomas.loc.gov/
DATE
ACTION
3/19/1997
Introduced in House
3/20/1997
Passed in House by Yeas and Nays: 295 136 (Roll Call 65).
5/20/1997
Passed in Senate with amendments by Yeas and Nays: 64 36 (Vote No. 71).
10/8/1997
Passed in House with Senate amendments by Yeas and Nays: 296 132 (Roll Call 500).
10/10/1997
Vetoed by President.
7/23/1998
Passed in House with the two-third majority required to override a Presidential veto by Yeas and Nays: 296 132 (Roll Call 325).
9/18/1998
Failed in Senate without the two-third majority required to override a Presidential veto by Yeas and Nays: 64 36 (Vote No. 277).
[368] Calculated with data from the
following sources:
a) Vote Number 71: "H.R. 1122 - To amend
title 18, United States Code, to ban
partial-birth abortions." U.S. Senate, May
20, 1997.
http://www.senate.gov/...
Voted YES
Voted NO
Republican
51
4
Democratic
13
32
b) Vote Number 500: "H.R. 1122 - To amend
title 18, United States Code, to ban
partial-birth abortions (Agree to Senate
Amendments)." U.S. House of Representatives,
October 8, 1997.
http://thomas.loc.gov/
Voted YES
Voted NO
Not Voting
Republican
217
8
2
Democratic
79
123
4
Independent
1
Totals from House and Senate votes above:
Voted YES
Voted NO
Not Voting
Total
Republican
268 (95%)
12 (4%)
2 (1%)
282
Democratic
92 (37%)
155 (62%)
4 (2%)
251
[369] Article: "Method to End 20-Week
Pregnancies Stirs a Corner of the Abortion
Debate." By Tamar Lewin. New York Times,
July 5, 1995.
http://query.nytimes.com/...
"Dilation and Extraction (D & X) was
developed in 1993 by Cincinnati physician W.
Martin Haskell, MD."
NOTE: This article describes the procedure
in detail and explains how Haskell came to
develop it.
[371] Article: "Method to End 20-Week
Pregnancies Stirs a Corner of the Abortion
Debate." By Tamar Lewin. New York Times,
July 5, 1995.
http://query.nytimes.com/...
Dr. Haskell, whose paper on how to perform
the procedure was distributed to other
doctors by the National Abortion Federation,
said in a letter to Mr. Canady's
subcommittee: "Statements that fetuses are
not dead until nearly the end of the
procedure are not accurate. Death occurs
early in the procedure if not before.
Representations that fetuses are living,
conscious, feeling pain, wiggling, kicking
or trying to escape are totally fictitious."
A letter to the Star-Tribune said the
procedure shown "is only performed after
fetal death when an autopsy is necessary or
to save the life of the mother." And the
Morrisville, Vt., Transcript quoted the
abortion federation as providing similar
information. "The fetus is dead 24 hours
before the pictured procedure is undertaken,
the editorial stated.
But Dr. Haskell and another doctor [McMahon]
who routinely use the procedure for late
term abortions told AMNews that the majority
of fetuses aborted this way are alive until
the end of the procedure.
[373] Article: "Method to End 20-Week
Pregnancies Stirs a Corner of the Abortion
Debate." By Tamar Lewin. New York Times,
July 5, 1995.
http://query.nytimes.com/...
"But anti-abortion groups point to
statements in earlier news accounts,
including a 1993 article in The American
Medical News, a publication of the American
Medical Association, that quoted the two
doctors as saying, 'The majority of fetuses
aborted this way are alive until the end of
the procedure.' "
Dr. Martin Haskell and Dr. James McMahon,
two abortionists who use the partial-birth
abortion method, were interviewed by the
American Medical News in 1993. These doctors
"told the AMNews that the majority of
fetuses aborted this way are alive until the
end of the procedure."14
Dr. Haskell and the National Abortion
Federation disputed the accuracy of the
AMNews article after the "Partial-Birth
Abortion Ban Act" was introduced this year,
claiming that out-of-context quotes were
used.15
14 Diane M. Gianelli, "Shock-Tactic Ads
Target Late--Term Abortion Procedure: Foes
Hope Campaign Will Sink Federal Abortion
Rights Legislation," American Medical News,
July 5, 1993, at 3, 21.
[375] Article: "Veto-proof majority in House
votes to prohibit late-term procedure." By
Diane M. Gianelli. American Medical News,
November 20, 1995.
"The accuracy of the article was challenged,
two years after publication, by Dr. Haskell
and the National Abortion Federation, who
told Congress the doctors were quoted 'out
of context.' "
We have full documentation of these
interviews, including tape recordings and
transcripts. Enclosed is a transcript of the
contested quotes that relate to the
allegations of inaccuracies made against
AMNews.
Let me also note that in the two years since
publication of our story, neither the
organization nor the physician who
complained about the report in testimony to
your committee has contacted the reporter or
any editor at AMNews to complain about it.
Relevant portions of recorded interview with
Martin Haskell, MD:
AMNews: Let's talk first about whether or
not the fetus is dead beforehand
Haskell: No it's not. No, it's really not. A
percentage are for various numbers of
reasons. Some just because of the stress --
intrauterine stress during, you know, the
two days that the cervix is being dilated.
Sometimes the membranes rupture and it takes
a very small superficial infection to kill a
fetus in utero when the membranes are
broken. So in my case, I would say probably
about a third of those are definitely are
[sic] dead before I actually start to remove
the fetus. And probably the other two-thirds
are not," said Dr. Haskell.
[377] House Report 104-267: "Partial-Birth
Abortion Ban Act of 1995." Judiciary
Committee, U.S. House of Representatives,
September 27, 1995.
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/...
Page 6:
In a letter to the Honorable Charles T.
Canady, Dr. James McMahon, an abortionist
who uses the partial-birth abortion method,
implies that large doses of analgesia kill
the baby before the doctor begins delivery.
He states:
The fetus feels no pain through the entire
series of procedures. This is because the
mother is given narcotic analgesia at a dose
based upon her weight. The narcotic is
passed, via the placenta, directly into the
fetal bloodstream. Due to the enormous
weight difference, a medical coma is induced
in the fetus. There is a neurological fetal
demise. There is never a live birth.18
18 Letter from James T. McMahon, M.D., to
Congressman Charles T. Canady (June 23,
1995) (on file with the Subcomm. on the
Constitution of the House Comm. on the
Judiciary).
[379] Letter: "Barbara Bolsen (Editor,
American Medical News) to Charles T. Canady
(Chairmen, Subcommittee on the Constitution,
Judiciary Committee, U.S. House of
Representatives)." July 11, 1995. See page 4
in pdf:
http://www.nrlc.org/abortion/pba/AmericanMedicalNews1993.pdf
NOTE: This statement was made in an
interview conducted for an article published
on July 5, 1993. That Haskell was primarily
referring to partial-birth abortion is
demonstrated in the next two footnotes.
[380] Paper: "Dilation and Extraction for
Late Second Trimester Abortion." By Martin
Haskell. Presented at the Fall Risk
Management Seminar of the National Abortion
Federation, September 13, 1992.
http://www.nrlc.org/abortion/pba/Haskellinstructional.pdf
Page 28: "The author routinely performs this
procedure [partial-birth abortion] on all
patients 20 through 24 weeks LMP with
certain exceptions."
But Dr. Haskell and another doctor who
routinely use the [partial-birth] procedure
for late term abortions . Dr. Haskell said
he performs abortions 'up until about 25
weeks' ' gestation, most of them elective."
[382] House Report 104-267: "Partial-Birth
Abortion Ban Act of 1995." Judiciary
Committee, U.S. House of Representatives,
September 27, 1995.
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/...
Page 8:
The writings of both Dr. Haskell and Dr.
McMahon advocate partial-birth abortion as
the method they prefer for all late-term
abortions.22 Dr. Haskell told the
AMNews
that the vast majority of the partial-birth
abortions he performs are elective. He
stated, "And I'll be quite frank: most of my
abortions are elective in that 2024 week
range. * * * In my particular case, probably
20% are for genetic reasons. And the other
80% are purely elective. * * *"23
Dr. McMahon uses the partial-birth abortion
method through the entire 40 weeks of
pregnancy. He claims that most of the
abortions he performs are "non-elective,"
but his definition of "non-elective" is
extremely broad. Dr. McMahon sent a letter
to the Constitution Subcommittee in which he
described abortions performed because of the
mother's youth or depression as
"non-elective."24
22 Haskell, supra note 4 at 27; Letter from
James T. McMahon, M.D., to the Subcomm. on
the Constitution of the House Comm. on the
Judiciary (June 6, 1995) (on file with the
Subcomm. on the Constitution of the House
Comm. on the Judiciary).
23 Letter from Barbara Bolsen, supra note
17.
24 Letter from James T. McMahon, M.D., supra
note 20.
This surgical procedure is used only in rare
cases fewer than 500 per year. It is most
often performed in cases of wanted
pregnancies gone tragically wrong, when a
family learns late in pregnancy of severe
fetal anomalies or a medical condition that
threatens the pregnant woman's life or
health.
[List of Signatories:] Advocates for Youth,
The Guttmacher Institute, American
Association of University Women, American
Civil Liberties Union, American Humanist
Association, American Jewish Committee,
American Jewish Congress, Americans for
Democratic Action, Americans for Religious
Liberty, Association of Reproductive Health
Professionals, The Center for Reproductive
Law and Policy, Center for Women's Policy
Studies, Clara Bell Duvall Education Fund,
Coalition of Labor Union Women, Disciples
for Choice, The Feminist Majority, Hollywood
Women's Political Committee, Human Rights
Campaign Fund, Institute for Research on
Women's Health, International Projects
Assistance Service, Medical Students for
Choice, Michigan Welfare Rights League,
National Abortion Federation, National
Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action
League, National Asian Women's Health
Network, National Association of Nurse
Practitioners, National Black Women's Health
Project, National Center for the ProChoice
Majority, National Council of Jewish Women,
National Family Planning and Reproductive
Health Association, National Latina
Institute for Reproductive Health, National
Organization for Women, National Republican
Coalition for Choice, National Women's
Health Network, National Women's Law Center,
Native American Women's Health Education
Resource Center, NOW Legal Defense and
Education Fund, People For the American Way
Action Fund, Planned Parenthood Federation
of America, Population Action International,
ProChoice Resource Center, Religious
Coalition for Reproductive Choice, Society
of Physicians for Reproductive Health and
Choice, Union of American Hebrew
Congregations, United Church Board for
Homeland Ministries, Voters For Choice,
Women of Reform Judaism, The Federation of
Temple Sisterhood, Women's Institute for
Freedom of the Press, Women's Law Project,
Women's Legal Defense Fund, Women's Rabbinic
Network, YWCA of the USA, Zero Population
Growth
[384] Press Release: "Aiming at the Right to
Abortion, Congress Votes to Ban a Medical
Procedure that Saves Women's Lives." PR
Newswire, November 1, 1995.
DISTRIBUTION: TO NATIONAL AND HEALTH/MEDICAL
EDITORS
Planned Parenthood Federation of America
issued the following:
In an unprecedented intrusion by Congress
into medical decisions, the U.S. House of
Representatives today voted to ban a late
abortion procedure designed to save women's
lives. The procedure, dilation and
extraction (D&X), is extremely rare and done
only in cases when the woman's life is in
danger or in cases of extreme fetal
abnormality.
"In November 1995, [Fitzsimmons] was
interviewed by 'Nightline' telling the
reporter that women had these abortion only
in the most extreme circumstances of life
endangerment or fetal anomaly."
[386] Article: "An Abortion Rights Advocate
Says He Lied About Procedure." By David
Stout. New York Times, February 26, 1997.
http://query.nytimes.com/...
"Mr. Fitzsimmons appeared on 'Nightline'
on ABC and said the procedure was used
rarely and only on women whose lives were in
danger or whose fetuses were damaged."
[387] On September 4, 2008, Just Facts
contacted the ABC News Store to obtain a
copy of this transcript and was told that
the program aired on 11/7/95, was entitled
"Late-term abortions," and ABC's legal
department has not approved it for release.
This was confirmed by a search of their
archives which revealed that this episode is
missing and that the shows surrounding it on
11/06/95 and 11/09/95 are available
[http://abcnewsstore.go.com/...].
[388] Press Release: "Capitol Hill Hearing
Testimony, March 21, 1996, Diana Zuckerman,
National Policy Director of Planned
Parenthood to the House Judiciary Committee
on the Constitution, Partial-Birth
Abortion." Planned Parenthood Federation Of
America, March 21, 1996.
We at Planned Parenthood are outraged that
Congress is continuing to intrude into
difficult and private medical decisions best
left to women, families, and doctors. The
attempt to ban dilation and extraction
(D&X), a late abortion procedure that is
used very rarely and in the most tragic
circumstances, places women's lives in
jeopardy.
The truth is that the D&X procedure is only
used when the woman's life or health is in
danger or in cases of extreme fetal anomaly.
[389] Article: "The Facts on Partial-Birth
Abortion; Both Sides Have Misled the
Public." By Ruth Padawer. Bergen Record,
September 15, 1996.
Doctors at Metropolitan Medical in Englewood
estimate that their clinic alone performs
3,000 abortions a year on fetuses between 20
and 24 weeks, of which at least half are by
intact dilation and evacuation.
"I always try [a partial-birth abortion
first]," said a Metropolitan Medical
gynecologist, who, like every other provider
interviewed for this article, spoke on
condition of anonymity for fear of
retribution.
"We have an occasional amnio abnormality,
but it's a minuscule amount," said one of
the doctors at Metropolitan Medical, an
assessment confirmed by another doctor
there. "Most are Medicaid patients, black
and white, and most are for elective, not
medical, reasons: people who didn't realize,
or didn't care, how far along they were.
Most are teenagers."
NOTE: This article alleges that "abortion
foes" have also misled in this debate. Most
of the points made to substantiate this
statement are addressed in
House Report
104-267. One that is not is this statement:
"In reality, only about 600, or 0.04
percent, of abortions of any type are
performed after 26 weeks, according to the
latest figures from Guttmacher." Compare
that with the following from American
Medical News:
Accurate figures on second- and
third-trimester abortions are elusive
because a number of states don't require
doctors to report abortion statistics. For
example, one-third of all abortions are said
to occur in California, but the state has no
reporting requirements.
There is a particular debate over the number
of third-trimester abortions. Former Surgeon
General C. Everett Koop, MD, estimated in
1984 that 4,000 are performed annually. The
abortion federation puts the number at 300
to 500. Dr. Haskell says that "probably
Koop's numbers are more correct." [Article:
"Shock-tactic ads target late-term abortion
procedure: Foes hope campaign will sink
federal abortion rights legislation." By
Diane M. Gianelli. American Medical News,
July 5, 1993.
http://www.nrlc.org/abortion/pba/AmericanMedicalNews1993.pdf]
[390] Letter to the editor and response:
"Abortion Numbers Questioned." From "The
management of Metropolitan Medical
Associates," September 23, 1996. Bergen
Record, October 2, 1996.
The editor replies: The Record stands behind
the story and rebuts the claims in
Metropolitan Medical's unsigned letter.
Metropolitan Medical's letter contradicts
what two prominent staff physicians at the
clinic, one of whom is also a high-ranking
administrator, told Staff Writer Ruth
Padawer independently of each other. The
first physician said the clinic each week
performs 60 to 100 abortions at 20 weeks
gestation or later, or 3,000 to 5,000 a
year. The second physician told Padawer that
the clinic handles 3,000 such cases a year.
Both physicians also independently told
Padawer that at least half the post-20 week
abortions performed at the clinic were by
the intact D&E method.
As for the Metropolitan Medical's claim that
a quotation by one of its doctors was
"erroneous": Padawer read back to him all of
his quotations, including the one about the
Medicaid patients. She also read him the
paragraph preceding and following the
quotations. He confirmed the accuracy and
context of each quotation.
[391] Article: "An Abortion Rights Advocate
Says He Lied About Procedure." By David
Stout. New York Times, February 26, 1997.
http://query.nytimes.com/...
Ron Fitzsimmons, the executive director of
the National Coalition of Abortion
Providers, said he intentionally misled in
previous remarks about the procedure
because he feared that the truth would
damage the cause of abortion rights.
Mr. Fitzsimmons recalled the night in
November 1995, when he appeared on
"Nightline" on ABC and "lied through my
teeth" when he said the procedure was used
rarely and only on women whose lives were in
danger or whose fetuses were damaged.
In the vast majority of cases, the procedure
is performed on a healthy mother with a
healthy fetus that is 20 weeks or more
along, Mr. Fitzsimmons said.
What abortion rights supporters failed to
acknowledge, Fitzsimmons said, is that the
vast majority of these abortion are
performed in the 20-plus week range on
healthy fetuses and healthy mothers. "The
abortion rights folks know it, the
anti-abortion folks know it, and so,
probably, does everyone else," he said.
He knows it, he says, because when the bill
to ban it came down the pike, he called
around until he found doctors who did them.
"I learned right away that this was being
done for the most part in cases that did not
involve those extreme circumstances," he
said.
[Quoting Fitzsimmons:] "When you're a doctor
who does these abortions and the leaders of
your movement appear before Congress and go
on network news and say these procedures are
done in only the most tragic of
circumstances, how do you think it makes you
feel? You know they're primarily done on
healthy women and healthy fetuses, and it
makes you feel like a dirty little
abortionist with a dirty little secret."
[394] Bill: "S.3: Partial-Birth Abortion Ban
Act of 2003. (Enrolled as Agreed to or
Passed by Both House and Senate)." U.S.
Congress, October 21, 2003.
http://thomas.loc.gov/
Sec. 1531. Partial -birth abortions
prohibited
(a) Any physician who, in or affecting
interstate or foreign commerce, knowingly
performs a partial -birth abortion and
thereby kills a human fetus shall be fined
under this title or imprisoned not more than
2 years, or both. This subsection does not
apply to a partial-birth abortion that is
necessary to save the life of a mother whose
life is endangered by a physical disorder,
physical illness, or physical injury,
including a life-endangering physical
condition caused by or arising from the
pregnancy itself. This subsection takes
effect 1 day after the enactment.
(b) As used in this section--
(1) the term 'partial -birth abortion' means
an abortion in which the person performing
the abortion --
(A) deliberately and intentionally vaginally
delivers a living fetus until, in the case
of a head-first presentation, the entire
fetal head is outside the body of the
mother, or, in the case of breech
presentation, any part of the fetal trunk
past the navel is outside the body of the
mother, for the purpose of performing an
overt act that the person knows will kill
the partially delivered living fetus; and
(B) performs the overt act, other than
completion of delivery, that kills the
partially delivered living fetus
[395] Web page: "Cosponsors - S.3:
Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003."
U.S. Library of Congress. Accessed September
2008 at http://thomas.loc.gov/
Cosponsors: 45 total (2 Democrats, 43
Republicans).
[396] Web page: "Major Actions - H.R. 1122:
To amend title 18, United States Code, to
ban partial-birth abortions." U.S. Library
of Congress. Accessed September 3, 2008 at
http://thomas.loc.gov/
DATE
ACTION
2/14/2003
Introduced in Senate
3/13/2003
Passed in Senate by Yeas and Nays: 64 33 (Vote No. 51).
6/4/2003
Passed in House without objection.
10/2/2003
Conference Report passed in House by Yeas and Nays: 281 142 (Roll Call 530).
10/21/2003
Conference Report passed in Senate by Yeas and Nays: 64 34 (Vote No. 402).
11/5/2003
Signed by President. Became Public Law No: 108-105.
[397] Calculated with data from the
following sources:
1) Vote Number 530: "S.3: A bill to prohibit
the procedure commonly known as
partial-birth abortion." U.S. House of
Representatives, October 2, 2003.
http://thomas.loc.gov/
Voted YES
Voted NO
Not Voting
Republican
218
4
7
Democratic
63
137
5
Independent
1
2) Vote Number 402: "S.3: A bill to prohibit
the procedure commonly known as
partial-birth abortion." U.S. Senate,
October 21, 2003.
http://www.senate.gov/...
Voted YES
Voted NO
Not Voting
Republican
47
3
1
Democratic
17
30
1
Independent
1
Totals from House and Senate votes above:
Voted YES
Voted NO
Not Voting
Total
Republican
268 (95%)
12 (4%)
2 (1%)
282
Democratic
92 (37%)
155 (62%)
4 (2%)
251
[398] Bill: "S.3 - Partial-Birth Abortion
Ban Act of 2003. (Enrolled as Agreed to or
Passed by Both House and Senate)." U.S.
Congress, October 21, 2003.
http://thomas.loc.gov/
Sec. 1531. Partial -birth abortions
prohibited
(a) Any physician who, in or affecting
interstate or foreign commerce, knowingly
performs a partial -birth abortion and
thereby kills a human fetus shall be fined
under this title or imprisoned not more than
2 years, or both.
[399] Ruling: Gonzales v. Carhart. United
States Supreme Court, April 18, 2007. Case
05-380. Decided 5-4. Majority: Kennedy,
Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, Alito. Concurring:
Thomas, Scalia. Dissenting: Ginsburg,
Stevens, Souter, Breyer.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/...
Section IV (B): "In addition the Act's
prohibition only applies to the delivery of
"a living fetus." If the [partial-birth
abortion] procedure is truly necessary in
some circumstances, it appears likely an
injection that kills the fetus is an
alternative under the Act that allows the
doctor to perform the procedure."
"The usual alternative to intact D&E is
"dismemberment D&E," in which the fetal
limbs are pulled off the body in utero,
sometimes while the fetus is still alive."
NOTE: See the next footnote for a more
detailed explanation.
Of the remaining abortions that take place
each year, most occur in the second
trimester. The surgical procedure referred
to as "dilation and evacuation" or "D&E" is
the usual abortion method in this trimester.
After sufficient dilation the surgical
operation can commence. The woman is placed
under general anesthesia or conscious
sedation. The doctor, often guided by
ultrasound, inserts grasping forceps through
the woman's cervix and into the uterus to
grab the fetus. The doctor grips a fetal
part with the forceps and pulls it back
through the cervix and vagina, continuing to
pull even after meeting resistance from the
cervix. The friction causes the fetus to
tear apart. For example, a leg might be
ripped off the fetus as it is pulled through
the cervix and out of the woman. The process
of evacuating the fetus piece by piece
continues until it has been completely
removed. A doctor may make 10 to 15 passes
with the forceps to evacuate the fetus in
its entirety, though sometimes removal is
completed with fewer passes. Once the fetus
has been evacuated, the placenta and any
remaining fetal material are suctioned or
scraped out of the uterus. The doctor
examines the different parts to ensure the
entire fetal body has been removed. See,
e.g., Nat. Abortion Federation, supra, at
465; Planned Parenthood, supra, at 962.
Some doctors, especially later in the second
trimester, may kill the fetus a day or two
before performing the surgical evacuation.
They inject digoxin or potassium chloride
into the fetus, the umbilical cord, or the
amniotic fluid. Fetal demise may cause
contractions and make greater dilation
possible. Once dead, moreover, the fetus'
body will soften, and its removal will be
easier. Other doctors refrain from injecting
chemical agents, believing it adds risk with
little or no medical benefit. Carhart,
supra, at 907-912; Nat. Abortion Federation,
supra, at 474-475.
The main difference between the two
procedures is that in [a partial-birth
abortion] a doctor extracts the fetus intact
or largely intact with only a few passes.
Section III (C) 1:
The Act excludes most D&Es [dilation and
evacuations] in which the fetus is removed
in pieces, not intact. Removing the fetus
in this manner does not violate the Act
because the doctor will not have delivered
the living fetus to one of the anatomical
landmarks or committed an additional overt
act that kills the fetus after partial
delivery.
D&E does not involve the delivery of a fetus
because it requires the removal of fetal
parts that are ripped from the fetus as they
are pulled through the cervix.
[402] Ruling: Gonzales v. Carhart. United
States Supreme Court, April 18, 2007. Case
05-380. Decided 5-4. Majority: Kennedy,
Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, Alito. Concurring:
Thomas, Scalia. Dissenting: Ginsburg,
Stevens, Souter, Breyer.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/...
In No. 05-380 (Carhart) respondents are
LeRoy Carhart, William G. Fitzhugh, William
H. Knorr, and Jill L. Vibhakar, doctors who
perform second-trimester abortions. These
doctors filed their complaint against the
Attorney General of the United States in the
United States District Court for the
District of Nebraska. They challenged the
constitutionality of the Act and sought a
permanent injunction against its
enforcement.
[403] Ruling: Gonzales v. Carhart. United
States Supreme Court, April 18, 2007. Case
05-380. Decided 5-4. Majority: Kennedy,
Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, Alito. Concurring:
Thomas, Scalia. Dissenting: Ginsburg,
Stevens, Souter, Breyer.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/...
In No. 05-380 (Carhart) respondents are
LeRoy Carhart, William G. Fitzhugh, William
H. Knorr, and Jill L. Vibhakar, doctors who
perform second-trimester abortions. These
doctors filed their complaint against the
Attorney General of the United States in the
United States District Court for the
District of Nebraska. They challenged the
constitutionality of the Act and sought a
permanent injunction against its
enforcement.
Respondents have not demonstrated that the
Act, as a facial matter, is void for
vagueness, or that it imposes an undue
burden on a woman's right to abortion based
on its overbreadth or lack of a health
exception. For these reasons the judgments
of the Courts of Appeals for the Eighth and
Ninth Circuits are reversed.
"Neither candidate shied away from a
question about which current Supreme Court
justice they would not have nominated.
Obama's reply: Clarence Thomas."
[Quoting Obama:] "I would not have nominated
Justice Scalia ."
[407] Bill S.1173: "Freedom of Choice Act."
Introduced in the United States Senate,
April 19, 2007.
http://thomas.loc.gov/
To protect, consistent with Roe v. Wade, a
woman's freedom to choose to bear a child or
terminate a pregnancy, and for other
purposes.
[Introduced by Barbara Boxer (D-California)
for herself, Patty Murray (D-Washington),
Debbie Stabenow (D-Michigan), Jeff Bingaman
(D-New Mexico), Robert Menendez (D-New
Jersey), Frank Lautenberg (D-New Jersey),
Benjamin Cardin (D-Maryland), Chuck Schumer
(D-New York), Diane Feinstein
(D-California), Hillary Clinton (D-New
York), Barbara Mikulski (D-Maryland), Max
Baucus (D-Montana), Maria Cantwell
(D-Washington).]
SEC. 4. INTERFERENCE WITH REPRODUCTIVE
HEALTH PROHIBITED.
(b) Prohibition of Interference- A
government may not-
(1) deny or interfere with a woman's right
to choose
(A) to bear a child;
(B) to terminate a pregnancy prior to
viability; or
(C) to terminate a pregnancy after viability
where termination is necessary to protect
the life or health of the woman; or
(2) discriminate against the exercise of the
rights set forth in paragraph (1) in the
regulation or provision of benefits,
facilities, services, or information.
SEC. 6. RETROACTIVE EFFECT.
This Act applies to every Federal, State,
and local statute, ordinance, regulation,
administrative order, decision, policy,
practice, or other action enacted, adopted,
or implemented before, on, or after the date
of enactment of this Act.
[408] House Resolution 1964 IH: "Freedom of
Choice Act." Introduced in U.S. House of
Representatives, April 19, 2007.
http://thomas.loc.gov/
[Introduced by Jerrold Nadler (New York), 56
other Democrats, and one Republican who has
since withdrawn his sponsorship.]
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
(9) Further threatening Roe, the Supreme
Court recently upheld the first-ever Federal
ban on abortion, which has no exception to
protect a woman's health. The majority
decision in Gonzales v. Carhart and
Gonzales
v. Planned Parenthood Federation of America
permits the government to interfere with a
woman's right to choose to terminate a
pregnancy and effectively overturns a core
tenet of Roe v. Wade by abandoning more than
30 years of protection for women's health.
SEC. 4. INTERFERENCE WITH REPRODUCTIVE
HEALTH PROHIBITED.
(a) Statement of Policy- It is the policy of
the United States that every woman has the
fundamental right to choose to bear a child,
to terminate a pregnancy prior to fetal
viability, or to terminate a pregnancy after
fetal viability when necessary to protect
the life or health of the woman.
(b) Prohibition of Interference- A
government may not
(1) deny or interfere with a woman's right
to choose
(A) to bear a child;
(B) to terminate a pregnancy prior to
viability; or
(C) to terminate a pregnancy after viability
where termination is necessary to protect
the life or health of the woman; or
(2) discriminate against the exercise of the
rights set forth in paragraph (1) in the
regulation or provision of benefits,
facilities, services, or information.
SEC. 6. RETROACTIVE EFFECT.
This Act applies to every Federal, State,
and local statute, ordinance, regulation,
administrative order, decision, policy,
practice, or other action enacted, adopted,
or implemented before, on, or after the date
of enactment of this Act.
"Yesterday [April 19, 2007] I was pleased to
stand with Senator Barbara Boxer,
Representative Jerrold Nadler and many
members of Congress as they announced the
reintroduction of this important act, which
would legislatively reverse the Court's
damaging decision [in Gonzalez v. Carhart]
and will enshrine in federal law our right
to safe, legal abortion."
"At the request of Mrs. BOXER, the name of
the Senator from Illinois (Mr. OBAMA) was
added as a cosponsor of S. 1173, a bill to
protect, consistent with Roe v. Wade, a
woman's freedom to choose to bear a child or
terminate a pregnancy, and for other
purposes."
"Well, the first thing I'd do as President
is sign the Freedom of Choice Act. That's
the first thing that I'd do."
[412] Ruling: Roe v. Wade. U.S. Supreme
Court, January 22, 1973. Case 410 U.S. 113.
Decided 7-2. Majority: Blackmun, Burger,
Brennan, Douglas, Stewart, Marshall, Powell.
Concurring: Burger, Douglas, Stewart.
Dissenting: White, Rehnquist.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/...
Section II:
Jane Roe,4 a single woman who was residing
in Dallas County, Texas, instituted this
federal action in March 1970 against the
District Attorney of the county. She sought
a declaratory judgment that the Texas
criminal abortion statutes were
unconstitutional on their face, and an
injunction restraining the defendant from
enforcing the statutes.
Roe alleged that she was unmarried and
pregnant; that she wished to terminate her
pregnancy by an abortion "performed by a
competent, licensed physician, under safe,
clinical conditions"; that she was unable to
get a "legal" abortion in Texas because her
life did not appear to be threatened by the
continuation of her pregnancy; and that she
could not afford to travel to another
jurisdiction in order to secure a legal
abortion under safe conditions.
4 The name is a pseudonym.
[413] Book: I Am Roe. By Norma McCorvey.
Harper Collins, 1994.
NOTE: Norma McCorvey first made her identity
public in the mid 1980's. Pages 172-173
contain information about her first
appearance on television, but no date is
given. However, the events in the book are
chronologically arranged, and the context of
the book indicates that this event took
place sometime between 1984 and 1986.
[414] Article: "Henry Wade, Prosecutor in
National Spotlight, Dies at 86." By Wolfgang
Saxon. New York Times, March 2, 2001.
"The attorney for Roe stated: 'I do feel
that it is--that the Ninth Amendment is an
appropriate place for the freedom to rest. I
think the Fourteenth Amendment is equally an
appropriate place, under the rights of
persons to life, liberty, and the pursuit of
happiness.' "
"The attorney for the State of Texas argued
that 'under the Fifth Amendment: no one
shall be deprived of the right to life,
liberty, and property without the due
process of law.' "
[429] Ruling: Roe v. Wade. U.S. Supreme
Court, January 22, 1973. Case 410 U.S. 113.
Decided 7-2. Majority: Blackmun, Burger,
Brennan, Douglas, Stewart, Marshall, Powell.
Concurring: Burger, Douglas, Stewart.
Dissenting: White, Rehnquist.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/...
Section I:
The Texas statutes that concern us here are
Arts. 1191-1194 and 1196 of the State's
Penal Code.1 These make it a crime to
"procure an abortion," as therein [410 U.S.
113, 118] defined, or to attempt one, except
with respect to "an abortion procured or
attempted by medical advice for the purpose
of saving the life of the mother." Similar
statutes are in existence in a majority of
the States.2 [410 U.S. 113, 119]
[ Footnote 1 ] "Article 1191. Abortion
"If any person shall designedly administer
to a pregnant woman or knowingly procure to
be administered with her consent any drug or
medicine, or shall use towards her any
violence or means whatever externally or
internally applied, and thereby procure an
abortion, he shall be confined in the
penitentiary not less than two nor more than
five years; if it be done without her
consent, the punishment shall be doubled. By
`abortion' is meant that the life of the
fetus or embryo shall be destroyed in the
woman's womb or that a premature birth
thereof be caused.
"Art. 1192. Furnishing the means
"Whoever furnishes the means for procuring
an abortion knowing the purpose intended is
guilty as an accomplice.
"Art. 1193. Attempt at abortion
"If the means used shall fail to produce an
abortion, the offender is nevertheless
guilty of an attempt to produce abortion,
provided [410 U.S. 113, 118] it be shown
that such means were calculated to produce
that result, and shall be fined not less
than one hundred nor more than one thousand
dollars.
"Art. 1194. Murder in producing abortion
"If the death of the mother is occasioned by
an abortion so produced or by an attempt to
effect the same it is murder."
"Art. 1196. By medical advice
"Nothing in this chapter applies to an
abortion procured or attempted by medical
advice for the purpose of saving the life of
the mother."
The foregoing Articles, together with Art.
1195, compose Chapter 9 of Title 15 of the
Penal Code. Article 1195, not attacked here,
reads:
"Art. 1195. Destroying unborn child
"Whoever shall during parturition of the
mother destroy the vitality or life in a
child in a state of being born and before
actual birth, which child would otherwise
have been born alive, shall be confined in
the penitentiary for life or for not less
than five years."
[ Footnote 2 ] Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. 13-211
(1956); Conn. Pub. Act No. 1 (May 1972
special session) (in 4 Conn. Leg. Serv. 677
(1972)), and Conn. Gen. Stat. Rev. 53-29,
53-30 (1968) (or unborn child); Idaho Code
18-601 (1948); Ill. Rev. Stat., c. 38, 23-1
(1971); Ind. Code 35-1-58-1 (1971); Iowa
Code 701.1 (1971); Ky. Rev. Stat. 436.020
(1962); La. Rev. Stat. 37:1285 (6) (1964)
(loss of medical license) (but see 14:87
(Supp. 1972) containing no exception for the
life of the mother under the criminal
statute); Me. Rev. Stat. Ann., Tit. 17, 51
(1964); Mass. Gen. Laws Ann., c. 272, 19
(1970) (using the term "unlawfully,"
construed to exclude an abortion to save the
mother's life, Kudish v. Bd. of
Registration, 356 Mass. 98, 248 N. E. 2d 264
(1969)); Mich. Comp. Laws 750.14 (1948);
Minn. Stat. 617.18 (1971); Mo. Rev. Stat.
559.100 (1969); Mont. Rev. Codes Ann. 94-401
(1969); Neb. Rev. Stat. 28-405 (1964); Nev.
Rev. Stat. 200.220 (1967); N. H. Rev. Stat.
Ann. 585:13 (1955); N. J. Stat. Ann. 2A:87-1
(1969) ("without lawful justification"); N.
D. Cent. Code 12-25-01, 12-25-02 (1960);
Ohio Rev. Code Ann. 2901.16 (1953); Okla.
Stat. Ann., Tit. 21, 861 (1972-1973 Supp.);
Pa. Stat. Ann., Tit. 18, [410 U.S. 113, 119]
4718, 4719 (1963) ("unlawful"); R. I. Gen.
Laws Ann. 11-3-1 (1969); S. D. Comp. Laws
Ann. 22-17-1 (1967); Tenn. Code Ann. 39-301,
39-302 (1956); Utah Code Ann. 76-2-1, 76-2-2
(1953); Vt. Stat. Ann., Tit. 13, 101 (1958);
W. Va. Code Ann. 61-2-8 (1966); Wis. Stat.
940.04 (1969); Wyo. Stat. Ann. 6-77, 6-78
(1957).
[430] Ruling: Roe v. Wade. U.S. Supreme
Court, January 22, 1973. Case 410 U.S. 113.
Decided 7-2. Majority: Blackmun, Burger,
Brennan, Douglas, Stewart, Marshall, Powell.
Concurring: Burger, Douglas, Stewart.
Dissenting: White, Rehnquist.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/...
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized
in the United States, and subject to the
jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the
United States and of the State wherein they
reside. No State shall make or enforce any
law which shall abridge the privileges or
immunities of citizens of the United States;
nor shall any State deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due
process of law; nor deny to any person
within its jurisdiction the equal protection
of the laws.
Section 2. Representatives shall be
apportioned among the several States
according to their respective numbers,
counting the whole number of persons in each
State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when
the right to vote at any election for the
choice of electors for President and Vice
President of the United States,
Representatives in Congress, the Executive
and Judicial officers of a State, or the
members of the Legislature thereof, is
denied to any of the male inhabitants of
such State, being twenty-one years of
age,(See Note 15) and citizens of the United
States, or in any way abridged, except for
participation in rebellion, or other crime,
the basis of representation therein shall be
reduced in the proportion which the number
of such male citizens shall bear to the
whole number of male citizens twenty-one
years of age in such State.
Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or
Representative in Congress, or elector of
President and Vice President, or hold any
office, civil or military, under the United
States, or under any State, who, having
previously taken an oath, as a member of
Congress, or as an officer of the United
States, or as a member of any State
legislature, or as an executive or judicial
officer of any State, to support the
Constitution of the United States, shall
have engaged in insurrection or rebellion
against the same, or given aid or comfort to
the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a
vote of two-thirds of each House, remove
such disability.
Section 4. The validity of the public debt
of the United States, authorized by law,
including debts incurred for payment of
pensions and bounties for services in
suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall
not be questioned. But neither the United
States nor any State shall assume or pay any
debt or obligation incurred in aid of
insurrection or rebellion against the United
States, or any claim for the loss or
emancipation of any slave; but all such
debts, obligations and claims shall be held
illegal and void.
Section 5. The Congress shall have power to
enforce, by appropriate legislation, the
provisions of this article.
[433] Entry: "Privacy."
Roget's Thesaurus.
Simon & Shuster, 1999.
[434] Book: The American Constitution: Its
Origins and Development. By Alfred H. Kelly
and Winfred A. Harbison. W.W. Norton &
Company, 1963. Third edition.
Pages 468 - 463 trace the history of the
Fourteenth Amendment.
[435] Ruling: Roe v. Wade. U.S. Supreme
Court, January 22, 1973. Case 410 U.S. 113.
Decided 7-2. Majority: Blackmun, Burger,
Brennan, Douglas, Stewart, Marshall, Powell.
Concurring: Burger, Douglas, Stewart.
Dissenting: White, Rehnquist.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/...
Section IX: "We need not resolve the
difficult question of when life begins. When
those trained in the respective disciplines
of medicine, philosophy, and theology are
unable to arrive at any consensus, the
judiciary, at this point in the development
of man's knowledge, is not in a position to
speculate as to the answer."
Section X: "In view of all this, we do not
agree that, by adopting one theory of life,
Texas may override the rights of the
pregnant woman that are at stake."
Section IX: "Texas urges that, apart from
the Fourteenth Amendment, life begins at
conception and is present throughout
pregnancy "
[436] Ruling: Roe v. Wade. U.S. Supreme
Court, January 22, 1973. Case 410 U.S. 113.
Decided 7-2. Majority: Blackmun, Burger,
Brennan, Douglas, Stewart, Marshall, Powell.
Concurring: Burger, Douglas, Stewart.
Dissenting: White, Rehnquist.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/...
Section IX: "Viability is usually placed at
about seven months (28 weeks) but may occur
earlier, even at 24 weeks."
Section XI: "For the stage subsequent to
viability, the State in promoting its
interest in the potentiality of human life "
NOTE: The terms "potential life" and
"potentiality of life" are used throughout
the ruling in reference to pre-born humans
at all stages of development.
[437] Ruling: Roe v. Wade. U.S. Supreme
Court, January 22, 1973. Case 410 U.S. 113.
Decided 7-2. Majority: Blackmun, Burger,
Brennan, Douglas, Stewart, Marshall, Powell.
Concurring: Burger, Douglas, Stewart.
Dissenting: White, Rehnquist.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/...
Section IX: "the word 'person,' as used in
the Fourteenth Amendment, does not include
the unborn."
Section IX lists all places where the word
"person" appears in the Constitution and it
amendments and then states: "But in nearly
all these instances, the use of the word is
such that it has application only
postnatally. None indicates, with any
assurance, that it has any possible
pre-natal application."
[438] Ruling: Roe v. Wade. U.S. Supreme
Court, January 22, 1973. Case 410 U.S. 113.
Decided 7-2. Majority: Blackmun, Burger,
Brennan, Douglas, Stewart, Marshall, Powell.
Concurring: Burger, Douglas, Stewart.
Dissenting: White, Rehnquist.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/...
Section XI: "For the stage prior to
approximately the end of the first
trimester, the abortion decision and its
effectuation must be left to the medical
judgment of the pregnant woman's attending
physician. The State may define the term
"physician" to mean only a physician
currently licensed by the State, and may
proscribe any abortion by a person who is
not a physician as so defined."
[439] Memorandum: "Re: No. 70-18 -
Roe v.
Wade." By Justice Harry A. Blackmun. Supreme
Court of the United States, November 21,
1972. (Click for full text of letter)
Herewith is a memorandum (1972 fall edition)
on the Texas abortion case.
This has proved for me to be both difficult
and elusive. In its present form it contains
dictum, but I suspect that in this area some
dictum is indicated and not to be avoided.
You will observe that I have concluded that
the end of the first trimester is critical.
This is arbitrary, but perhaps any other
selected point, such as quickening or
viability, is equally arbitrary.
The opinion's author, Justice Harry A.
Blackmun, said in one internal court memo
that he was drawing "arbitrary" lines about
the times during pregnancy when a woman
could legally receive an abortion. In
another memo, Justice Potter Stewart, who
joined the Blackmun opinion, said the
determination in the opinion about these
lines was "legislative."
The Roe v. Wade memos were found among the
personal papers of the late Justice William
O. Douglas, which became available to the
public at the Library of Congress last year.
[441] Ruling: Roe v. Wade. U.S. Supreme
Court, January 22, 1973. Case 410 U.S. 113.
Decided 7-2. Majority: Blackmun, Burger,
Brennan, Douglas, Stewart, Marshall, Powell.
Concurring: Burger, Douglas, Stewart.
Dissenting: White, Rehnquist.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/...
Section XI: "For the stage subsequent to
approximately the end of the first
trimester, the State, in promoting its
interest in the health of the mother, may,
if it chooses, regulate the abortion
procedure in ways that are reasonably
related to maternal health."
Section X: "Examples of permissible state
regulation in this area are requirements as
to the qualifications of the person who is
to perform the abortion; as to the licensure
of that person; as to the facility in which
the procedure is to be performed, that is,
whether it must be a hospital or may be a
clinic or some other place of
less-than-hospital status; as to the
licensing of the facility; and the like."
[442] Ruling: Roe v. Wade. U.S. Supreme
Court, January 22, 1973. Case 410 U.S. 113.
Decided 7-2. Majority: Blackmun, Burger,
Brennan, Douglas, Stewart, Marshall, Powell.
Concurring: Burger, Douglas, Stewart.
Dissenting: White, Rehnquist.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/...
Section XI: "For the stage subsequent to
viability the State, in promoting its
interest in the potentiality of human life,
may, if it chooses, regulate, and even
proscribe, abortion except where necessary,
in appropriate medical judgment, for the
preservation of the life or health of the
mother."
[443] Ruling: Roe v. Wade. U.S. Supreme
Court, January 22, 1973. Case 410 U.S. 113.
Decided 7-2. Majority: Blackmun, Burger,
Brennan, Douglas, Stewart, Marshall, Powell.
Concurring: Burger, Douglas, Stewart.
Dissenting: White, Rehnquist.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/...
Section VIII:
Specific and direct harm medically
diagnosable even in early pregnancy may be
involved. Maternity, or additional
offspring, may force upon the woman a
distressful life and future. Psychological
harm may be imminent. Mental and physical
health may be taxed by child care. There is
also the distress, for all concerned,
associated with the unwanted child, and
there is the problem of bringing a child
into a family already unable,
psychologically and otherwise, to care for
it. In other cases, as in this one, the
additional difficulties and continuing
stigma of unwed motherhood may be involved.
All these are factors the woman and her
responsible physician necessarily will
consider in consultation.
[444] Ruling: Doe v. Bolton. U.S. Supreme
Court, January 22, 1973. Case 410 U.S. 179.
Decided 7-2. Majority: Blackmun, Brennan,
Stewart, Marshall, Powell. Concurring:
Burger, Douglas. Dissenting: White,
Rehnquist.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/...
Section IV: "[T]he medical judgment may be
exercised in the light of all factors --
physical, emotional, psychological,
familial, and the woman's age -- relevant to
the well-being of the patient. All these
factors may relate to health."
[445] Ruling: Roe v. Wade. U.S. Supreme
Court, January 22, 1973. Case 410 U.S. 113.
Decided 7-2. Majority: Blackmun, Burger,
Brennan, Douglas, Stewart, Marshall, Powell.
Concurring: Burger, Douglas, Stewart.
Dissenting: White, Rehnquist.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/...
Section XI: "On the basis of elements such
as these, appellant and some amici argue
that the woman's right is absolute and that
she is entitled to terminate her pregnancy
at whatever time, in whatever way, and for
whatever reason she alone chooses. With this
we do not agree."
[446] Ruling: Roe v. Wade. U.S. Supreme
Court, January 22, 1973. Case 410 U.S. 113.
Decided 7-2. Majority: Blackmun, Burger,
Brennan, Douglas, Stewart, Marshall, Powell.
Concurring: Burger, Douglas, Stewart.
Dissenting: White, Rehnquist.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/...
Section VIII: "The privacy right cannot be
said to be absolute."
Section VIII: "[M]ost of these courts have
agreed that the right of privacy is not
absolute and is subject to some limitations;
and that at some point the state interests
as to protection of prenatal life, become
dominant. We agree with this approach."
Section IX: "As we have intimated above, it
is reasonable and appropriate for a State to
decide that at some point in time
potential human life, becomes significantly
involved. The woman's privacy is no longer
sole and any right of privacy she possesses
must be measured accordingly."
Section X: "We repeat, however, that the
State does have an important and legitimate
interest in protecting the potentiality of
human life."
[447] Ruling: Doe v. Bolton. U.S. Supreme
Court, January 22, 1973. Case 410 U.S. 179.
Decided 7-2. Majority: Blackmun, Brennan,
Stewart, Marshall, Powell. Concurring:
Burger, Douglas. Dissenting: White,
Rehnquist.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/...
[448] Ruling: Roe v. Wade. U.S. Supreme
Court, January 22, 1973. Case 410 U.S. 113.
Decided 7-2. Majority: Blackmun, Burger,
Brennan, Douglas, Stewart, Marshall, Powell.
Concurring: Burger, Douglas, Stewart.
Dissenting: White, Rehnquist.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/...
Section XI: "In Doe v. Bolton, post, p. 179,
procedural requirements contained in one of
the modern abortion statutes are considered.
That opinion and this one, of course, are to
be read together."
[449] Ruling: Doe v. Bolton. U.S. Supreme
Court, January 22, 1973. Case 410 U.S. 179.
Decided 7-2. Majority: Blackmun, Brennan,
Stewart, Marshall, Powell. Concurring:
Burger, Douglas. Dissenting: White,
Rehnquist.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/...
NOTE: Appendix "A" contains the relevant
text of the Criminal Code of Georgia.
[450] Ruling: Doe v. Bolton. U.S. Supreme
Court, January 22, 1973. Case 410 U.S. 179.
Decided 7-2. Majority: Blackmun, Brennan,
Stewart, Marshall, Powell. Concurring:
Burger, Douglas. Dissenting: White,
Rehnquist.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/...
Section IV: "C. We agree with the District
Court . [T]he medical judgment may be
exercised in the light of all factors --
physical, emotional, psychological,
familial, and the woman's age -- relevant to
the well-being of the patient. All these
factors may relate to health."
NOTE: Contrary to some commentaries on this
case, these statements do not constitute a
new ruling. This aspect of the law was not
before the court in this instance. It was
before the lower court and ruled upon, and
the appeal was not accepted by the Supreme
Court. In the quote above, the Supreme Court
was simply restating their decision in Roe
v. Wade. As Section II of Doe v. Bolton
states: "The extent, therefore, to which the
District Court decision was adverse to the
defendants, that is, the extent to which
portions of the Georgia statutes were held
to be unconstitutional, technically is not
now before us."
[451] Ruling: Doe v. Bolton. U.S. Supreme
Court, January 22, 1973. Case 410 U.S. 179.
Decided 7-2. Majority: Blackmun, Brennan,
Stewart, Marshall, Powell. Concurring:
Burger, Douglas. Dissenting: White,
Rehnquist.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/...
Section I:
[F]or an abortion to be authorized [410 U.S.
179, 184] or performed as a noncriminal
procedure, additional conditions must be
fulfilled. These are... (3) reduction to
writing of the performing physician's
medical judgment that an abortion is
justified for one or more of the reasons
specified by 26-1202 (a), with written
concurrence in that judgment by at least two
other Georgia-licensed physicians, based
upon their separate personal medical
examinations of the woman (5) advance
approval by an abortion committee of not
less than three members of the hospital's
staff....
[452] Ruling: Doe v. Bolton. U.S. Supreme
Court, January 22, 1973. Case 410 U.S. 179.
Decided 7-2. Majority: Blackmun, Brennan,
Stewart, Marshall, Powell. Concurring:
Burger, Douglas. Dissenting: White,
Rehnquist.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/...
Section II: "The [District] court, however,
held that Georgia's interest in protection
of health, and the existence of a 'potential
of independent human existence' justified
state regulation of 'the manner of
performance as well as the quality of the
final decision to abort' and it refused to
strike down the other provisions of the
statutes."
Section IV:
D. The appellants next argue that the
District Court should have declared
unconstitutional three procedural demands of
the Georgia statute: (1) that the abortion
be performed in a hospital accredited by the
Joint Commission on Accreditation of
Hospitals:11 (2) that the procedure be
approved by the hospital staff abortion
committee; and (3) that the performing
physician's judgment be confirmed by the
independent examinations of the patient by
two other licensed physicians.
We hold that the JCAH-accreditation
requirement does not withstand
constitutional scrutiny in the present
context.
We conclude that the interposition of the
hospital abortion committee is unduly
restrictive of the patient's rights and
needs that, at this point, have already been
medically delineated and substantiated by
her personal physician.
There remains, however, the required
confirmation by two Georgia-licensed
physicians in addition to the recommendation
of the pregnant woman's own consultant
(making under the statute, a total of six
physicians involved, including the three on
the hospital's abortion committee). We
conclude that this provision, too, must
fall.
The statute's emphasis, as has been
repetitively noted, is on the attending
physician's "best clinical judgment that an
abortion is necessary." That should be
sufficient. The reasons for the presence of
the confirmation step in the statute are
perhaps apparent, but they are insufficient
to withstand constitutional challenge. If
a physician is licensed by the State, he is
recognized by the State as capable of
exercising acceptable clinical judgment.
If a physician is licensed by the State, he
is recognized by the State as capable of
exercising acceptable clinical judgment.
[454] Article: "Veto-proof majority in House
votes to prohibit late-term procedure." By
Diane M. Gianelli, American Medical News,
November 20, 1995.
"Warren Hern, MD. The author of Abortion
Practice, the nation's most widely used
textbook on abortion standards and
procedures. Dr. Hern specializes in
late-term procedures."
[455] Article: "Debate might be less about
abortion than politicking." By Mimi Hall.
USA Today, May 15, 1997. Page 5A.
" 'I say every pregnancy carries a risk of
death,' says defiant physician Warren Hern
of Boulder, Colo., who performs late-term
abortions."
[456] Article: "Daschle bill may not ban
anything; Abortionists could use own
judgment." By Frank J. Murray. Washington
Times, May 15, 1997.
Dr. Warren Hern, who literally wrote the
textbook on "Abortion Practice."
The Denver gynecologist said the fact of
occasional death in childbearing can justify
any abortion, no matter how late it is done.
"I will certify that any pregnancy is a
threat to a woman's life and could cause
'grievous injury' to her 'physical health,'"
Dr. Hern said, using key words from the
Daschle bill....
[457] Ruling: Planned Parenthood of
Southeastern PA v. Casey. United States
Supreme Court. June 29, 1992. Case 505 U.S.
833.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/...
Consideration of the fundamental
constitutional question resolved by Roe v.
Wade, 410 U.S. 113, principles of
institutional integrity, and the rule of
stare decisis require that Roe's essential
holding be retained [505 U.S. 834] and
reaffirmed as to each of its three parts:
(1) a recognition of a woman's right to
choose to have an abortion before fetal
viability and to obtain it without undue
interference from the State, whose
pre-viability interests are not strong
enough to support an abortion prohibition or
the imposition of substantial obstacles to
the woman's effective right to elect the
procedure; (2) a confirmation of the State's
power to restrict abortions after viability,
if the law contains exceptions for
pregnancies endangering a woman's life or
health; and (3) the principle that the State
has legitimate interests from the outset of
the pregnancy in protecting the health of
the woman and the life of the fetus that may
become a child.
Roe's rigid trimester framework is rejected.
To promote the State's interest in potential
life throughout pregnancy, the State may
take measures to ensure that the woman's
choice is informed. Measures designed to
advance this interest should not be
invalidated if their purpose is to persuade
the woman to choose childbirth over
abortion. These measures must not be an
undue burden on the right.
[458] Ruling: Planned Parenthood of
Southeastern PA v. Casey. United States
Supreme Court. June 29, 1992. Case 505 U.S.
833.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/...
Adoption of the undue burden standard does
not disturb Roe's holding that, regardless
of whether exceptions are made for
particular circumstances, a State may not
prohibit any woman from making the ultimate
decision to terminate her pregnancy before
viability.
Roe's holding that "subsequent to viability,
the State, in promoting its interest in the
potentiality of human life, may, if it
chooses, regulate, and even proscribe,
abortion except where it is necessary, in
appropriate medical judgment, for the
preservation of the life or health of the
mother" is also reaffirmed.
[459] Article: "The Baby Who's Not Supposed
to Be Alive." By Pat Wingert. Newsweek (Web
Exclusive), August 21, 2007.
http://www.newsweek.com/id/36697
"The chance of survival for a 21-week
six-day old fetus is zero. That's something
Miami obstetrician Guillermo Lievano thought
he knew for sure. Then he delivered Amillia
Taylor, who weighed just 10 ounces, and
appears to be the youngest premature baby
ever to survive, beating the record by more
than a week."
[460] Ruling: Planned Parenthood of
Southeastern PA v. Casey. United States
Supreme Court. June 29, 1992. Case 505 U.S.
833.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/...
[T]he State may take measures to ensure that
the woman's choice is informed, and measures
designed to advance this interest will not
be invalidated as long as their purpose is
to persuade the woman to choose childbirth
over abortion. These measures must not be an
undue burden on the right.
As with any medical procedure, the State may
enact regulations to further the health or
safety of a woman seeking an abortion.
Unnecessary health regulations that have the
purpose or effect of presenting a
substantial obstacle to a woman seeking an
abortion impose an undue burden on the
right. [505 U.S. 833, 879]
Our adoption of the undue burden analysis
does not disturb the central holding of Roe
v. Wade, and we reaffirm that holding.
Regardless of whether exceptions are made
for particular circumstances, a State may
not prohibit any woman from making the
ultimate decision to terminate her pregnancy
before viability.
[461] Paper: "Termination of pregnancy for
fetal anomaly: a population-based study 1995
to 2004." By M. Wyldes. BJOG: An
International Journal of Obstetrics and
Gynaecology, May 2007. Pages 639-642.
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/...
Location: West Midlands region of Britain
Sample period: 1995-2004
Sample size: 808,237 conceptions; 646,342
births
Number of preborn humans aborted because
they had conditions such as Down's Syndrome,
heart defects, and kidney problems = 3,189
Median age at time of abortion: 19 weeks
(range of 8 to 40 weeks)
Number of live births: 102
Median survival time: 80 minutes (37
newborns survived for an hour or less, six
for 6 hours or more)
[462] Article: "Fetus." By Frank D. Allan in
the Encyclopedia of Human Biology. Academic
Press, 1997. Volume 3.
Page 962 states that in the third month,
"Electrical activity of the nervous system
is discernible.... Attempts to suckle have
been seen in utero and in aborted fetuses of
3 months."
[463] Paper: "An infant who survived
abortion and neonatal intensive care." By P.
Clarke & others. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, January 2005. Pages 73-74,
http://www.informaworld.com/...
Page 73: "A 24-week gestation male infant
was born alive in November 2002, several
days after repeated attempts at medical
termination of pregnancy."
[464] Article: "Boy is aborted 3 times and
lives." By Lois Rogers and Sarah-Kate
Templeton. London Times, February 13, 2005.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/...
"A BABY survived at least three attempts to
abort it from the womb and was born alive at
24 weeks old."
[465] Article: "We're twinseparable! Happy
with his brother, the boy who refused to
die." By Lucy Laing. London Daily Mail,
November 3, 2007.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/...
[466] Article: "Mother's anger turns to
delight after her baby survives an
abortion." By Liz Hull. London Daily Mail,
June 5, 2008.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/...
[467] Article: "In Debate on Abortion, 2
Girls Make It Real." By Tamar Lewin. New
York Times, October 27, 1991.
http://query.nytimes.com/...
"Ms. DePaul will not identify Gianna's birth
mother, the doctor who performed the
abortion, the clinic or the nurse who, she
said, rescued Gianna by transferring her to
a hospital nursery. But to support her story
she released some of the medical records
from the adoption, including a section
called 'Complications of Birth,' which has
the notation, 'Born during saline abortion.'
"
[468] Testimony of Gianna Jessen."
Subcommittee on the Constitution, Judiciary
Committee, U.S. House of Representatives,
July 20, 2000.
http://commdocs.house.gov/...
Page 54: "I was delivered alive on April
6, 1977, at 6 a.m. in a southern California
abortion clinic."
"She has cerebral palsy as a direct result
of the procedure carried out on her in the
womb. She started to walk with leg braces
and by the age of four was walking with the
aid of a walker - now she walks without any
assistance."
"On April 30, 2005 she completed her first
26.2 mile marathon.... On April 23, 2006 she
completed the London Marathon as well. In
fact she has run a marathon, is an
accomplished singer and writer and travels
the world to campaign against abortion."
[471] Testimony: "Jill L. Stanek, Mokena,
IL." Subcommittee on the Constitution,
Judiciary Committee, U.S. House of
Representatives, July 20, 2000. Pages 34-39.
http://commdocs.house.gov/...
My name is Jill Stanek, and I am a
registered nurse who has worked in the Labor
and Delivery Department at Christ Hospital
in Oak Lawn, Illinois, for the past 5 years.
Christ Hospital performs abortions on women
in their second or even third trimesters of
pregnancy. Sometimes the babies aborted are
healthy, and sometimes they are not.
It is not uncommon for a live aborted baby
to linger for an hour or two or even longer.
One of these babies was known to live for
almost an entire 8-hour shift.
In the event that a baby is aborted alive,
he or she receives no medical assessments or
care, but is given only what the Christ
Hospital calls "comfort care." Comfort care
is defined as keeping the baby warm in a
blanket until he or she dies, although even
this so-called compassion is not always
provided. It is not required that these
babies be held during their short lives.
One night, a nursing co-worker was taking an
aborted Down's syndrome baby who was born
alive to our Soiled Utility Room because his
parents did not want to hold him and she did
not have time to hold him. I could not bear
the thought of this suffering child dying
alone in a Soiled Utility Room, so I cradled
and rocked him for the 45 minutes that he
lived.
Other co-workers have told me upsetting
stories about live aborted babies whom they
have cared for. I was told about an aborted
baby who was supposed to have spina bifida,
but was delivered with an intact spine.
Another nurse is haunted by the memory of an
aborted baby who came out weighing much more
than expectedalmost 2 pounds. She is
haunted because she doesn't know if she made
a mistake by not getting that baby any
medical help. A support associate told me
about a live aborted baby who was left to
die on a counter in our Soiled Utility room
wrapped in a disposable towel. This baby was
accidentally thrown in the garbage. Later,
when they were going through the trash
trying to find the baby, the baby fell out
of the towel and onto the floor.
I was recently told about a situation by a
nurse who said, "I can't stop thinking about
it." She had a patient who was 23-plus weeks
pregnant, and it did not look as if her baby
would continue to be able to live inside of
her. The baby was healthy and had up to a 39
percent chance of survival, according to our
national statistics. But the patient chose
to abort. The baby was born alive. After
delivery, the baby, who showed early signs
of thrivingher Apgars improvedwas merely
wrapped in a blanket and kept in the Labor
and Delivery Department until she died two
and a half hours later.
[472] Testimony: "Allison Baker,
Charlottesville, VA." Subcommittee on the
Constitution, Judiciary Committee, U.S.
House of Representatives, July 20, 2000.
Pages 40-43.
http://commdocs.house.gov/...
I am also an RN. I worked at Christ Hospital
for a year between the time of August 1998
to August 1999. I am now presently a
pediatric nurse in Charlottesville.
During this time, I witnessed three cases.
When I first started, I was on day shift. I
walked into the Soiled Utility Room to throw
something away, and laying on the metal part
of the table with nothing underneath, there
was a fetus, a baby, moving vigorously, just
laying there.
I went out to find the nurse who was
responsible for this baby, and she said that
the mother had been what they call a
therapeutic abortion, as Jill had explained,
and that she just didn't have time to do
anything with the baby at the time, and that
if I could, could I wrap the baby and put
the baby in a warmer.
So I went to the Soiled Utility Room,
wrapped the baby, and held the baby and
found a warmer and placed the baby in the
warmer. And for about two and a half hours,
the baby maintained a heartbeat, the baby
was alive.
The next case that I actually participated
in was I had come on to shift and there was
a patient that had delivered a baby, a
20-week fetus who had spina bifida. The
baby, once again, was alive and the baby had
a heartbeat. It took an hour and 45 minutes
for this baby to finally expire.
The last case that I experienced while I was
there was a 16-week fetus that was aborted,
and the baby was supposed to have had
Down's. And the baby at 16 weeks was born
with a heartbeat, and the parents thought
that the baby would die right away because
it was so early. The baby ended up living
for approximately 45 minutes, and during
this time, the parents were very upset and
kept questioning me and other nurses: how
come their baby wasn't dead, when was their
baby going to die, why was their baby alive?
[473] Article: "Bill proposes care for fetus
after abortion." By Dave McKinney. Chicago
Sun-Times. March 31, 2001.
"A spokesman for Christ Hospital's parent,
Advocate Health Care, said it provides
'compassionate care' for its patients and
estimated that between 10 percent and 20
percent of fetuses with genetic defects that
are aborted survive for short periods
outside the womb."
[474]Senate Bill 1095: "An Act concerning
infants who are born alive." State of
Illinois,
(a) In determining the meaning of any
statute or of any rule, regulation, or
interpretation of the various administrative
agencies of this State, the words "person",
"human being", "child", and "individual"
include every infant member of the species
homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage
of development.
(b) As used in this Section, the term "born
alive", with respect to a member of the
species homo sapiens, means the complete
expulsion or extraction from its mother of
that member, at any stage of development,
who after that expulsion or extraction
breathes or has a beating heart, pulsation
of the umbilical cord, or definite movement
of voluntary muscles, regardless of whether
the umbilical cord has been cut and
regardless of whether the expulsion or
extraction occurs as a result of natural or
induced labor, cesarean section, or induced
abortion.
(c) A live child born as a result of an
abortion shall be fully recognized as a
human person and accorded immediate
protection under the law.
[475]Senate Bill 1662: "An Act concerning
infants who are born alive." State of
Illinois,
NOTE: The operative language is the same as
the bill quoted in the footnote above.
[476] Vote: "Senate Bill 1095 (third
reading) - An Act concerning infants who are
born alive." State of Illinois Senate, 92nd
General Assembly, March 30, 2001.
http://www.ilga.gov/...
[477] Vote: "Senate Bill 1662 (third
reading) An Act concerning infants who are
born alive." State of Illinois Senate, 92nd
General Assembly, April 4, 2002.
The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. STEARNS). The
question is on the motion offered by the
gentleman from Wisconsin (Mr. SENSENBRENNER)
that the House suspend the rules and pass
the bill, H.R. 2175 [Born-Alive Infants
Protection Act].
The question was taken.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. In the opinion of
the Chair, two-thirds of those present have
voted in the affirmative.
There being no objection, the Senate
proceeded to consider the bill.
Mr. REID. Mr. President, I ask unanimous
consent that the bill be read the third time
and passed, the motion to reconsider be laid
upon the table, and that any statements
relating to the bill be printed in the
RECORD.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it
is so ordered.
The bill (H.R. 2175) was read the third time
and passed.
[480] Public Law 107-207: "Born-Alive
Infants Protection Act of 2002." 107th
United States Congress. Signed into law by
President George W. Bush on August 5, 2002.
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/...
An Act
To protect infants who are born alive. [H.R.
2175]
(a) In determining the meaning of any Act of
Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or
interpretation of the various administrative
bureaus and agencies of the United States,
the words 'person', 'human being', 'child',
and 'individual', shall include every infant
member of the species homo sapiens who is
born alive at any stage of development.
(b) As used in this section, the term 'born
alive', with respect to a member of the
species homo sapiens, means the complete
expulsion or extraction from his or her
mother of that member, at any stage of
development, who after such expulsion or
extraction breathes or has a beating heart,
pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite
movement of voluntary muscles, regardless of
whether the umbilical cord has been cut, and
regardless of whether the expulsion or
extraction occurs as a result of natural or
induced labor, cesarean section, or induced
abortion.
(c) Nothing in this section shall be
construed to affirm, deny, expand, or
contract any legal status or legal right
applicable to any member of the species homo
sapiens at any point prior to being 'born
alive' as defined in this section.
KEYES: Well, I think it's very clear. The
Born Alive Infant Protection Act that was
aimed at making sure that children born
alive after an abortion procedure would not
be set aside to die like garbage--when
babies at exactly the same stage of
development are being accessed and then
saved right there down the hall in the same
hospitals where they are boasting about
their ability to save preemies. I think that
we have to take seriously the testimony of
people like Jill Stanek and others, and not
pretend that this problem does not exist.
And I think that's a travesty. Senator
[Obama] ignored that travesty, not once, not
twice, but three times on the plea now, I
suppose, that this problem does not exist. I
guess he's calling the nurses involved
liars.
OBAMA: You know, if Ambassador Keyes had
called me up, he could have saved himself a
trip because existing Illinois law mandates
that any infant that has a chance for
survival is provided life-saving treatment.
Not only that, you've got to have a second
doctor there to certify that in fact that is
the case. That continues to be the case,
that is current law today, as it should be.
Now, the bill that was put forward was
essentially a way of getting around Roe vs.
Wade, which is why 21 other senators,
Democrat and Republican, why the Illinois
Medical Society objected to the bill. At the
federal level there was a similar bill that
passed because it had an amendment saying
this does not encroach on Roe vs. Wade. I
would have voted for that bill.
[482] Senate Bill 1082: "An Act concerning
infants who are born alive." State of
Illinois Senate, 93rd General Assembly,
2003.
http://www.ilga.gov/...
[483] "Amendment To Senate Bill 1082." Filed
by Senator Richard J. Winkel, Jr.
(Republican). State of Illinois Senate, 93rd
General Assembly, March 11, 2003.
http://www.ilga.gov/...
Amend Senate Bill 1082 on page 1, by
replacing lines 24 through 26 with the
following:
"(c) Nothing in this Section shall be
construed to affirm, deny, expand, or
contract any legal status or legal right
applicable to any member of the species homo
sapiens at any point prior to being born
alive as defined in this Section."
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Filed with Secretary by Sen. Richard J. Winkel, Jr.
3/11/2003
Senate
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Referred to Rules {See third note below. All amendments are initially referred to this committee.}
3/12/2003
Senate
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Rules Refers to Health & Human Services {See note below. This committee was chaired by Obama.}
[485] Web page: "Health & Human Services
Committee Members." State of Illinois
Senate, 93rd General Assembly. Accessed July
2008 at
http://www.ilga.gov/...
"Chairperson: Barack Obama [Democrat]"
[486] Senate Committee Action Report:
"Senate Bill 1082." Illinois Senate
Committee on Health and Human Services,
March 12, 2003.
http://www.nrlc.org/...
"Final Action DPA [Do Pass As Amended]
Obama, Barack - No Total - 4 Yes, 6 No"
[487] Article: "Lawmakers approve
abortion-friendly legislation." By Kristy
Hessman. Associated Press, March 13, 2003.
Also on Thursday, the [Illinois] Senate
Health and Human Services Committee rejected
a bill that declares any fetus with a
beating heart or muscle movement outside the
womb as "born alive."
The sponsor, Sen. Rick Winkel, R-Champaign,
said the bill is modeled after a recent
federal policy that defines a "born-alive"
infant.
Winkel's bill got four "yes" votes and six
"no" votes.